Homeopathy 2004; 93(02): 94-98
DOI: 10.1016/j.homp.2004.01.002
Education and Debate
Copyright ©The Faculty of Homeopathy 2004

Patient–practitioner–remedy (PPR) entanglement. Part 5. Can homeopathic remedy reactions be outcomes of PPR entanglement?

L.R. Milgrom

Subject Editor:
Further Information

Publication History

Received22 August 2003
revised24 October 2003

accepted21 January 2004

Publication Date:
27 December 2017 (online)

Abstract

The possibility that well-documented types of reaction to the prescribed homeopathic medicine may be outcomes of PPR entanglement is discussed within the context of a previously described model for homeopathy that incorporates GHZ three-particle entanglement and Weak Quantum Theory.

 
  • References

  • 1 Walach H. Magic of signs: a non-local interpretation of homeopathy. Br Hom J 2000; 89: 127–140 and references therein.
  • 2 Stevenson C, Dearer VS, Fountain-Barber A, Hawkins S, Ernst E. J Roy Soc Med 2003; 96: 60–65.
  • 3 Walach H. Entanglement model of homeopathy as an example of generalised entanglement predicted by weak quantum theory. Forsch Komp Klass Natur 2003; 10: 192–200.
  • 4 Davenas E, Beauvais F, Amara J, Oberbaum M, Robinson B, Miadonna A, Tedeschi A, Pomeranz B, Fortner P, Belon P, Saint-Laudy J, Poitevin B, Benveniste J. Human basophil de-granulation triggered by very dilute antiserum against IgE. Nature 1988; 333: 816–818.
  • 5 (a) Belon P, Cumps J, Ennis M, Mannaioni PF, Saint-Laudy J, Roberfroid M, Wiegant FA. Inhibition of human basophil degranulation by successive histamine dilutions: results of a European multi-centre trial. Inflamm Res 1999; 48 Suppl 1: S17-8 (b) Samal S, Geckeler KE. Chem Commun 2001, 2224. (c) see, for example, Schiff M. The Memory of Water: Homoeopathy and the Battle of Ideas in the New Science, London: Thorsons (HarperCollins), 1995 and references therein. (d) Del Guidice E, Preparata G, Vitiello G. Water as a free electron dipole laser. Phys Rev Lett 1988; 61: 1085–1088 (e) See Bellavite P, Signorini A. Homeopathy:A Frontier in Medical Science, Berkeley, CA: North Atlantic Books, 1995.
  • 6 Rey L. Thermoluminescence of ultra-high dilutions of lithium chloride and sodium chloride. Physica A 2003; 323: 67–74.
  • 7 Linde K, Clausius N, Ramirez G, et al. Are the clinical effects of homeopathy placebo effects? A meta-analysis of placebo-controlled trials. Lancet 1997; 350: 834–843. Cucherat M, Haugh MC, Gooch M, Boissel JP. Evidence of clinical efficacy of homeopathy. A meta-analysis of clinical trials. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 2000; 56: 27–33.
  • 8 Atmanspacher H, Römer H, Walach H. Weak quantum theory; complementarity and entanglement in physics and beyond. Found Phys 2002; 32: 379–406.
  • 9 Waldrop MM. Complexity: The Emerging Science at the Edge of Order and Chaos, London: Penguin Books, 1994. See also, Hyland ME. A connectionist theory of asthma. J Clin Exp Allergy 1999; 29: 1467–1573 Hyland ME. The intelligent body. New Scientist 2001; 170(2292): 32–33.
  • 10 Weingartner O. What is the therapeutically active ingredient of homeopathic potencies? Homp 2003; 92: 145–151.
  • 11 Hyland M. A brief guide to extended network entanglement theory as a theory of healing an its empirical predictions. Forsch Komp Klass Natur 2003; 10: 201–206.
  • 12 (a) Milgrom LR. Patient–practitioner–remedy (PPR) entanglement. Part 1. A qualitative non-local metaphor for homeopathy based on quantum theory. Homp 2002; 91: 239–248. (b) Milgrom LR. Patient–practitioner–remedy (PPR) entanglement. Part 2. Extending the metaphor for homeopathy using molecular quantum mechanics. Homp 2003; 92: 35–43. (c) Milgrom LR. Patient–practitioner–remedy (PPR) entanglement. Part 3. Refining the quantum metaphor for homeopathy. Homp 2003; 92: 152–156. (d) Milgrom LR. Patient–practitioner–remedy (PPR) entanglement. Part 4. Towards classification and unification of the different quantum models for homeopathy. Homp 2004; 93: 34–42.
  • 13 Kent J.T.. Lectures in Homeopathic Philosophy, Lecture XXXV. Remedy Reactions. Sittingbourne, UK: Homeopathic Book Service; 1990
  • 14 Vithoulkas G.. The Science of Homeopathy. London: Thorsons; 1986
  • 15 Wooters WK. Quantum entanglement as a quantifiable resource. Philos Trans R Soc London A 1998; 356: 1717–1731.
  • 16 See reference 15, and references therein. Also, Aczel AD. Entanglement: The Greatest Mystery in Physics, Chichester, UK: Wiley, 2003.
  • 17 Kent J.T.. Lectures in Homeopathic Philosophy, Lecture XXIV. Idiosyncrasies. Sittingbourne, UK: Homeopathic Book Service; 1990
  • 18 Hyland M. Complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) research should focus on mechanism rather than efficacy, private communication: see also reference 1.
  • 19 Einstein A, Podolsky B, Rosen N. Can a quantum mechanical description of physical reality be considered complete? Phys Rev 1935; 47: 777–780.
  • 20 Wackermann J, Seiter C, Keibel H, Walach H. Correlations between brain electrical activities of two spatially separated human subjects. Neurosci Lett 2003; 326: 60–64.
  • 21 Aspect A, Grangier P, Roger G. Experimental realization of Einstein–Podolsky–Rosen–Bohm Gedanken experiment: a new violation of Bell's inequalities. Phys Rev Lett 1982; 49: 91–94.