Patient compliance with homeopathic therapy

The Homeopathic Clinic of the Campo di Marte Hospital, Lucca, Italy (the Homeopathic Reference Centre for Tuscany) registered a total of 1287 patients seen for the first time between September 1998 and 31 December 2004, of these 560 (43.5%) returned for a follow-up visit after a minimum interval of 2 months following the first consultation.

In order to ascertain the reasons for patients not returning for follow-up consultations (drop-out) a telephone survey was carried out on every patient who had been seen during the period from 1 June 2002 to 31 May 2003, but had not returned for a follow-up visit.

73/104 eligible patients were contacted. 37/73 referred to the effectiveness of the treatment which led to an improvement in their state of health, naming this as the reason why they did not return for a follow-up visit.

Keywords

homeopathic therapy - patient compliance - satisfaction - public health

• References

• 1 Carr-Hill Roy A. The measurement of patient satisfaction. J Public Health Med 1992; 14: 236-249.
• 2 Feinstein A.R. Clinimetrics. Westford, MA: Yale University; 1987.
• 3 Wright J.G. Evaluating the outcome of treatment: shouldn’t we be asking patients if they are better?. J Clin Epidemiol 2000; 53: 549-553.
• 4 Wright J.G, Young N.L. The patient-specific index: asking patients what they want. J Bone Joint Surg 1997; 79A: 974-983.
• 5 Testa M.A, Simonson D.C. Management of hypertension and nephropathy in diabetes. Measuring quality of life in hypertensive patients with diabetes. Postgrad Med J 1988; 64: 50-58.
• 6 Mullen P.D. Compliance becomes concordance. BMJ 1997; 314: 691.
• 7 Richardson W.R. Patient benefit survey: Liverpool Regional Department of Homoeopathic Medicine. Br Homeopath J 2001; 90: 158-162.
• 8 Rezzani C.M. WinChip: computerized homeopathic investigation programme: a data collection tool to help the doctor in daily practice and a real instrument to prove and improve homeopathy. Proceedings of the International Conference “Improving the Success of Homeopathy 2: Developing and Demonstrating Effectiveness” London, 15–16 April 1999; p32.
• 9 Walker A.H, Restuccia J.D. Obtaining information on patient satisfaction with Hospital Care: mail versus telephone. Health Services Res 1984; 19: 3.
• 10 Güthlin C, Lange O, Walach H. Measuring the effects of acupuncture and homoeopathy in general practice: an uncontrolled prospective documentation approach. BMC Public Health 2004; 4: 1-13.
• 11 Rossi E, Crudeli L, Garibaldi D. Valutazione delle variazioni del consumo farmacologico convenzionale e dei costi economici in corso di terapia omeopatica classica in pazienti affetti da disturbi delle vie respiratory. Proceedings of the International Conference “Safety Evaluation of Complementary and Alternative Medicine”, Palazzo delle Esposizioni, Empoli 24–25 October, 2003, p23.
• 12 Hanita M. Self-report measures of patient utility: should we trust them?. J Clin Epidemiol 2000; 53: 469-476.