Outcomes from homeopathic prescribing in veterinary practice: a prospective, research-targeted, pilot study

Abstract

Background and aims Targeted research development in veterinary homeopathy is properly informed by the systematic collection and analysis of relevant clinical data obtained by its practitioners. We organised a pilot data collection study, in which 8 Faculty of Homeopathy veterinarians collected practice-based clinical and outcomes data over a 6-month period.

Methods A specifically designed Excel spreadsheet enabled recording of consecutive clinical appointments under the following headings: date; identity of patient and owner (anonymised); age, sex and species of patient; medical condition/complaint treated; whether confirmed diagnosis, chronic or acute, new or follow-up case; owner-assessed outcome (7-point Likert scale: −3 to +3) compared with first appointment; homeopathic medicine/s prescribed; other medication/s for the condition/complaint. Spreadsheets were submitted monthly by e-mail to the project organisers for data checking, synthesis and analysis.

Results Practitioners submitted data regularly and punctually, and most data cells were completed. 767 individual patients were treated (547 dogs, 155 cats, 50 horses, 5 rabbits, 4 guinea-pigs, 2 birds, 2 goats, 1 cow, and 1 tortoise). Outcome from two or more homeopathic appointments per patient condition was obtained in 539 cases (79.8% showing improvement, 6.1% deterioration, 11.7% no change; outcome not recorded in 2.4% of follow-ups). Strongly positive outcomes (scores of +2 or +3) were achieved in: arthritis and epilepsy in dogs and, in smaller numbers, in atopic dermatitis, gingivitis and hyperthyroidism in cats.

Conclusions Systematic recording of data by veterinarians in clinical practice is feasible and capable of informing future research in veterinary homeopathy. A refined version of the spreadsheet can be used in larger-scale research-targeted veterinary data collection.

Keywords

systematic data collection - veterinary homeopathy - clinical outcomes - research targeting

• References

• 1 Van Wassenhoven M. Priorities and methods for developing the evidence profile of homeopathy. Recommendations of the ECH general assembly and XVIII Symposium of GIRI. Homeopathy 2005; 94: 107-124.
• 2 Hektoen L. Review of the current involvement of homeopathy in veterinary practice and research. Vet Rec 2005; 157: 224-229.
• 3 Abrecht H., Schütte A. Homeopathy versus antibiotics in metaphylaxis of infectious diseases: a clinical study in pig fattening and its significance to consumers. Altern Ther Health Med 1999; 5: 64-68.
• 4 Searcy R., Reyes O., Guajardo G. Control of subclinical bovine mastitis. Utilization of a homoeopathic combination. Br Hom J 1995; 84: 67-70.
• 5 Williamson A.V., Mackie W.L., Crawford W.J., Rennie B. A study using Sepia 200c given prophylactically postpartum to prevent anoestrus problems in the dairy cow. Br Hom J 1991; 80: 149-156.
• 6 Sevar R. Audit of outcome in 455 consecutive patients treated with homeopathic medicines. Homeopathy 2005; 94: 215-221.
• 7 Robinson T.W. Responses to homeopathic treatment in National Health Service general practice. Homeopathy 2006; 95: 9-14.
• 8 Mathie R.T., Robinson T.W. Outcomes from homeopathic prescribing in medical practice: a prospective, research-targeted, pilot study. Homeopathy 2006; 95: 199-205.
• 9 Both G. Report on an experiment in practice to treat fertility disturbances in swine with homeopathic preparations. Dtsch Tierärztl Wochenschr 1980; 87: 460-461.
• 10 Elliott M. Cushing's Disease: a new approach to therapy in equine and canine patients. Br Hom J 2001; 90: 33-36.
• 11 Varshney J.P., Naresh R. Evaluation of a homeopathic complex in the clinical management of udder diseases of riverine buffaloes. Homeopathy 2004; 93: 17-20.
• 12 Spence D.S., Thompson E.A., Barron S.J. Homeopathic treatment for chronic disease: a 6-year, university-hospital outpatient observational study. J Altern Complement Med 2005; 11: 793-798.
• 13 Gordon S., Ameen V., Bagby B., Shahan B., Jhingran P., Carter E. Validation of irritable bowel syndrome Global Improvement Scale: an integrated symptom end point for assessing treatment efficacy. Dig Dis Sci 2003; 48: 1317-1323.
• 14 Clover A. Patient benefit survey: Tunbridge Wells Homoeopathic Hospital. Br Hom J 2000; 89: 68-72.
• 15 Mercer S.W., Reilly D., Watt G.C. The importance of empathy in the enablement of patients attending the Glasgow Homoeopathic Hospital. Br J Gen Pract 2002; 52: 901-905.
• 16 White A., Ernst E. The case for uncontrolled clinical trials: a starting point for the evidence base for CAM. Complement Ther Med 2001; 9: 111-115.
• 17 Walach H., Jonas W.B., Lewith G.T. The role of outcomes research in evaluating complementary and alternative medicine. Altern Ther Health Med 2002; 8: 88-95.
• 18 Bell I. Evidence-based homeopathy: empirical questions and methodological considerations for homeopathic research. Am J Hom Med 2003; 96: 17-31.
• 19 Mathie R.T. Clinical outcomes research: contributions to the evidence-base for homeopathy. Homeopathy 2003; 92: 56-57.