Download PDF
Homeopathy 2007; 96(01): 42-45
DOI: 10.1016/j.homp.2006.11.006
Education and Debate
Copyright © The Faculty of Homeopathy 2007

Reporting data on homeopathic treatments (RedHot): a supplement to CONSORT

M.E. Dean
1   University of York, UK
,
M.K. Coulter
1   University of York, UK
,
P. Fisher
2   Royal London Homoeopathic Hospital, UK
,
K. Jobst
2   Royal London Homoeopathic Hospital, UK
,
H. Walach
3   University of Northampton, UK
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
21 December 2017 (online)

Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

When homeopathy is tested in clinical trials, understanding and appraisal is likely to be improved if published reports contain details of prescribing strategies and treatments. An international Delphi panel was convened to develop consensus guidelines for reporting homeopathic methods and treatments. The panel agreed 28 treatment- and provider-specific items that supplement the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) Statement items 2, 3, 4 and 19. The authors recommend these for adoption by authors and journals when reporting trials of homeopathy.

☆ This paper was jointly submitted to Forschende Komplementärmedizin/Research in Complementary Medicine, JACM and Homeopathy, and is published in these journals in parallel. A German translation of this paper is accessible at www.karger.com/doi/10.1159/000097073.

Keywords

homeopathy - international cooperation - publishing/standards - quality control - randomized controlled trials/standards - reproducibility of results - research design/standards
 

  • References

  • 1 Moher D, Schulz KF, Altman DG. The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel group randomized trials. BMC Med Res Methodol 2001;1:2. http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2288/1/2 (accessed 27 October 2006).
    PubMed
  • 2 Boutron I. et al. A checklist to evaluate a report of a nonpharmacological trial (CLEAR NPT) was developed using consensus. J Clin Epidemiol 2005; 58 (12) 1233-1240.
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 3 Piaggio G. et al. Reporting of noninferiority and equivalence randomized trials: an extension of the CONSORT statement. JAMA 2006; 295 (10) 1152-1160.
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 4 Veal L. Countering misleading information. Complement Ther Nurs Midwifery 2004; 10 (01) 54-57.
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 5 MacPherson H. et al. Standards for reporting interventions in controlled trials of acupuncture: the STRICTA recommendations. J Altern Complement Med 2002; 8 (01) 85-89.
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 6 Gagnier J.J. et al. Reporting randomized, controlled trials of herbal interventions: an elaborated CONSORT statement. Ann Intern Med 2006; 144 (05) 364-367.
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 7 Linde K. et al. The methodological quality of randomized controlled trials of homeopathy, herbal medicines and acupuncture. Int J Epidemiol 2001; 30 (03) 526-531.
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 8 Bell I. Evidence-based homeopathy: empirical questions and methodological considerations for homeopathic clinical research. American Journal of Homeopathic Medicine 2003; 96 (01) 17-31.
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 9 Dean ME. The Trials of Homeopathy: Origins, Structure and Development. Essen: KVC-Verlag, 2004, p. 236.
    PubMed
  • 10 Shang A. et al. Are the clinical effects of homoeopathy placebo effects? Comparative study of placebo-controlled trials of homoeopathy and allopathy. Lancet 2005; 366: 726-732.
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar