Homeopathy 2010; 99(01): 3-14
DOI: 10.1016/j.homp.2009.10.002
Original Paper
Copyright © The Faculty of Homeopathy 2009

The similia principle: Results obtained in a cellular model system

Fred Wiegant
1   Faculty of Science, Department of Biology, Utrecht University, The Netherlands
,
Roeland Van Wijk
1   Faculty of Science, Department of Biology, Utrecht University, The Netherlands
2   International Institute of Biophysics, Neuss, Germany
› Author Affiliations

Subject Editor:
Further Information

Publication History

Received27 July 2009
revised23 October 2009

accepted28 October 2009

Publication Date:
20 December 2017 (online)

This paper describes the results of a research program focused on the beneficial effect of low dose stress conditions that were applied according to the similia principle to cells previously disturbed by more severe stress conditions. In first instance, we discuss criteria for research on the similia principle at the cellular level. Then, the homologous (‘isopathic’) approach is reviewed, in which the initial (high dose) stress used to disturb cellular physiology and the subsequent (low dose) stress are identical.

Beneficial effects of low dose stress are described in terms of increased cellular survival capacity and at the molecular level as an increase in the synthesis of heat shock proteins (hsps). Both phenomena reflect a stimulation of the endogenous cellular self-recovery capacity. Low dose stress conditions applied in a homologous approach stimulate the synthesis of hsps and enhance survival in comparison with stressed cells that were incubated in the absence of low dose stress conditions. Thirdly, the specificity of the low dose stress condition is described where the initial (high dose) stress is different in nature from the subsequently applied (low dose) stress; the heterologous or ‘heteropathic’ approach.

The results support the similia principle at the cellular level and add to understanding of how low dose stress conditions influence the regulatory processes underlying self-recovery. In addition, the phenomenon of ‘symptom aggravation’ which is also observed at the cellular level, is discussed in the context of self-recovery. Finally, the difference in efficiency between the homologous and the heterologous approach is discussed; a perspective is indicated for further research; and the relationship between studies on the similia principle and the recently introduced concept of ‘postconditioning hormesis’ is emphasized.

 
  • References

  • 1 Van Wijk R., Wiegant F.A.C. The similia principle as a therapeutic strategy: a research program on stimulation of self-defense in disordered mammalian cells. Altern Ther Health Med 1997; 3: 33-38.
  • 2 Van Wijk R., Wiegant F.A.C. The similia principle. An experimental approach on the cornerstone of homeopathy. Essen: Karl und Veronica Carstens-Stiftung; 2006.
  • 3 Wiegant F.A.C., Souren J.E.M., Van Wijk R. Stimulation of survival capacity in heat-shocked cells by subsequent exposure to minute amounts of chemical stressors: role of similarity in hsp-inducing effects. Hum Exp Toxicol 1999; 18: 460-470.
  • 4 Calabrese E.J., Bachmann K.A., Bailer A.J. et al. Biological stress response terminology: integrating the concepts of adaptive response and preconditioning stress within a hormetic dose–response framework. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 2007; 222: 122-128.
  • 5 Selye H. The stress of life. New York: McGraw-Hill Companies; 1978.
  • 6 Hightower L.E. Heat shock, stress proteins, chaperones, and proteotoxicity. Cell 1991; 66: 191-197.
  • 7 Cohen E., Dillin A. The insulin paradox: aging, proteotoxicity and neurodegeneration. Nat Rev Neurosci 2008; 9: 759-767.
  • 8 Gregersen N., Bross P., Vang S., Christensen J.H. Protein misfolding and human disease. Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet 2006; 7: 103-124.
  • 9 Liu M., Hodish I., Rhodes C.J., Arvan P. Proinsulin maturation, misfolding, and proteotoxicity. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2007; 104: 15841-15846.
  • 10 Morimoto R.I. Proteotoxic stress and inducible chaperone networks in neurodegenerative disease and aging. Genes Dev 2008; 22: 1427-1438.
  • 11 Van Wijk R., Van Wijk E.P., Wiegant F.A.C., Ives J. Free radicals and low-level photon emission in human pathogenesis: state of the art. Indian J Exp Biol 2008; 46: 273-309.
  • 12 Pitot H.C., Perraino C., Morse P.A., Potter V.R. Hepatomas in tissue culture compared with adapting liver in vivo. Natl Cancer Inst Monogr 1964; 13: 229-234.
  • 13 Van Wijk R. Regulation of DNA synthesis in cultured rat hepatoma cells. Int Rev Cytol 1983; 85: 63-107.
  • 14 Mattson M.P. Hormesis and disease resistance: activation of cellular stress response pathways. Hum Exp Toxicol 2008; 27: 155-162.
  • 15 Csermely P., Vigh L. Molecular Aspects of the Stress Response: Chaperones, Membranes and Networks. 2007. New York: Landes Bioscience and Springer Science + Business Media.;
  • 16 Parsell D.A., Lindquist S. The function of heat shock proteins in stress tolerance: degradation and reactivation of damaged proteins. Annu Rev Genet 1993; 27: 437-496.
  • 17 Wiegant F.A.C., Souren J.E.M., Van Rijn J., Van Wijk R. Stressor-specific induction of heat shock proteins in rat hepatoma cells. Toxicology 1994; 94: 143-159.
  • 18 Hahn G.M., Li G.C. Thermotolerance, thermoresistance and thermosensitization. In: Morimoto R.I., Tissières A., Georgopoulos C. Stress Proteins in Biology and Medicine. 1990. New York: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press; 79-100.
  • 19 Schamhart D.H.J., Zoutewelle G., Van Aken H., Van Wijk R. Effects on the expression of heat shock proteins by step-down heating and hypothermia in rat hepatoma cells with a different degree of heat sensitivity. Int J Hyperthermia 1992; 8: 701-716.
  • 20 Wiegant F.A.C., Souren J.E.M., Van Rijn J., Van Wijk R. Arsenite-induced sensitization and self-tolerance of Reuber H35 hepatoma cells. Cell Biol Toxicol 1993; 9: 49-59.
  • 21 Wiegant F.A.C., Van Rijn J., Van Wijk R. Enhancement of the stress response by minute amounts of cadmium in sensitized Reuber H35 hepatoma cells. Toxicology 1997; 116: 27-37.
  • 22 Ryan J.A., Hightower L.E. Stress proteins as molecular biomarkers for environmental toxicology. EXS 1996; 77: 411-424.
  • 23 Van Wijk R., Ovelgönne J.H., de Koning E., Jaarsveld K., Van Rijn J., Wiegant F.A.C. Mild step-down heating causes increased transcription levels of hsp68 and hsp84 mRNA and enhances thermotolerance development in Reuber H35 hepatoma cells. Int J Hyperth 1994; 10: 115-125.
  • 24 Delpino A., Gentile F.P., Di Modugno F., Benassi M., Mileo A.M., Mattei E. Thermo-sensitization, heat shock protein synthesis and development of thermotolerance in M-14 human tumor cells subjected to step-down heating. Radiat Environ Biophys 1992; 31: 323-332.
  • 25 Ovelgönne J.H., Wiegant F.A.C., Souren J.E.M., Van Rijn J., Van Wijk R. Enhancement of the stress response by low concentrations of arsenite in arsenite-pretreated H35 hepatoma cells. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 1995; 132: 146-155.
  • 26 Wilder J. The law of initial value in neurology and psychiatry; facts and problems. J Nerv Ment Dis 1957; 125: 73-86.
  • 27 Souren J.E.M., Wiegant F.A.C., van Hof P., van Aken J.M., Van Wijk R. The effect of temperature and protein synthesis on the renaturation of firefly luciferase in intact H9c2 cells. Cell Mol Life Sci 1999; 55: 1473-1481.
  • 28 Souren J.E.M., Wiegant F.A.C., Van Wijk R. The role of hsp70 in protection and repair of luciferase activity in vivo; experimental data and mathematical modelling. Cell Mol Life Sci 1999; 55: 799-811.
  • 29 Westerheide S.D., Morimoto R.I. Heat shock response modulators as therapeutic tools for diseases of protein conformation. J Biol Chem 2005; 280 (39) 33097-33100.
  • 30 Wiegant F.A.C., Spieker N., Van der Mast C.A., Van Wijk R. Is heat shock protein re-induction during tolerance related to the stressor-specific induction of heat shock proteins?. J Cell Physiol 1996; 169: 364-372.
  • 31 Wiegant F.A.C., Spieker N., Van Wijk R. Stressor-specific enhancement of hsp induction by low doses of stressors in conditions of self- and cross-sensitization. Toxicology 1998; 127: 107-119.
  • 32 Laszlo A. The relationship of heat-shock proteins, thermotolerance, and protein synthesis. Exp Cell Res 1988; 178: 401-414.
  • 33 Calabrese E.J. Hormesis: why is it important to toxicology and toxicologists. Environ Toxicol Chem 2008; 27: 1451-1474.
  • 34 Luckey T.D. Hormesis with ionizing radiation. Boca Raton: CRC Press; 1980.
  • 35 Stebbing A.R.D. A mechanism for hormesis; a problem in the wrong discipline. Crit Rev Toxicol 2003; 33: 463-467.
  • 36 Van Wijk R., Ooms H., Wiegant F.A.C. et al. A molecular basis for understanding the benefits from subharmful doses of toxicants. Environ Manage Health 1994; 5: 13-25.
  • 37 Zhao Z.Q., Corvera J.S., Halkos M.E. et al. Inhibition of myocardial injury by ischemic postconditioning during reperfusion: comparison with ischemic preconditioning. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 2003; 285: H579-H588.
  • 38 Prins HAB, Van Wijk R, Wiegant FAC. Postconditioning hormesis put in perspective; history and overview. (Submitted) 2009.