Wie gelingt Home Treatment in der Praxis? Eine qualitative Studie unter Einbezug von Patienten, Angehörigen und Mitarbeitenden

Zusammenfassung

Ziel der Studie Identifikation von Wirkmechanismen und von Faktoren für eine erfolgreiche Umsetzung von Home Treatment (HT) aus Stakeholder-Sicht.

Methoden Thematische Analyse halbstrukturierter Interviews mit Patienten, Angehörigen und Mitarbeitenden, Online-Umfrage mit Mitarbeitenden.

Ergebnisse 25 Interviews und 70 Fragebögen wurden analysiert.

Schlussfolgerung Zentrale Themen sind: Individualisierung und Alltagsnähe der Behandlung, Behandlungskonzept sowie Anforderungen. Herausforderungen für die Umsetzung betreffen Indikationsstellung, Zuweisungszeitpunkt und Verantwortungsübernahme.

Abstract

Objective To identify effective components of home treatment (HT) and to evaluate the implementation of a new HT team from a service user perspective.

Methods Experiences of patients, relatives and staff were assessed using semi-structured interviews and an online questionnaire. Thematic analysis was applied to determine key themes.

Results 25 interviews and 70 questionnaires were analysed. Four key themes emerged: individualisation, proximity to daily life, conceptual aspects, and requirements (for patients and for the service model). Major challenges for the implementation of HT were the suitability for HT, time of referral to HT, and handing over of responsibility from hospital staff to the HT team.

Conclusion Essential requirements for HT are no-harm agreements, patients’ ability to maintain daily routines, and shared responsibility between patients and staff. Implementing HT within an existing care system should be accompanied by sufficient information on the new service model for other service providers involved. This may be achieved through HT team members visiting hospital wards and outpatient facilities, illustrating functioning and limitations of HT using case reports.

Schlüsselwörter

Home Treatment - Nutzerperspektive - thematische Analyse

Keywords

home treatment - user perspective - thematic analysis

• Literatur

• 1 Berhe T, Puschner B, Kilian R. et al. „Home treatment“ für psychische Erkrankungen. Nervenarzt 2005; 76: 822-831
• 2 Burns T, Knapp M, Catty J, Healey A, Henderson J, Watt H, Wright C. Home treatment for mental health problems: a systematic review. NIHR Health Technology Assessment Programme, 2001
• 3 Thornicroft G, Tansella M. Components of a modern mental health service: a pragmatic balance of community and hospital care: overview of systematic evidence. Brit J Psychiat 2004; 185: 283-290
• 4 Hubbeling D, Bertram R. Crisis resolution teams in the UK and elsewhere. J Ment Health 2012; 21: 285-295
• 5 Murphy SM, Irving CB, Adams CE, Wagar M. Crisis intervention for people with severe mental illnesses. Cochrane Db Syst Rev 2015 12. CD001087
• 6 Catty J, Burns T, Knapp M. et al. Home treatment for mental health problems: a systematic review. Psychol Med 2002; 32: 383-401
• 7 Wheeler C, Lloyd-Evans B, Churchard A. et al. Implementation of the Crisis Resolution Team model in adult mental health settings: a systematic review. BMC Psychiatry 2015; 15: 74
• 8 Bauer E, Kleine-Budde K, Stegbauer C. et al. Structures and processes necessary for providing effective home treatment to severely mentally ill persons: a naturalistic study. BMC Psychiatry 2016; 16: 242
• 9 Winness MG, Borg M, Kim HS. Service users’ experiences with help and support from crisis resolution teams. A literature review. J Ment Health 2010; 19: 75-87
• 10 Irving CB, Adams CE, Rice K. Crisis intervention for people with severe mental illnesses. Cochrane Db Syst Rev 2006 CD001087
• 11 Wright C, Catty J, Watt H. et al. A systematic review of home treatment services. Soc Psych Psych Epid 2004; 39: 789-796
• 12 Hepp U, Stulz N. Home Treatment: Von der Forschung zur klinischen Umsetzung. Psychiat Prax 2017; 44: 371-373
• 13 Gühne U, Weinmann S, Arnold K. et al. Akutbehandlung im häuslichen Umfeld: Systematische Übersicht und Implementierungsstand in Deutschland. Psychiat Prax 2011; 38: 114-122
• 14 Bundesamt für Gesundheit. Die Zukunft der Psychiatrie in der Schweiz. Bern: 2016
• 15 Widmann F, Bachhuber G, Riedelsheimer A. et al. Home Treatment. Fortschr Neurol Psyc 2016; 84: 42-49
• 16 Weinmann S, Gaebel W. Versorgungserfordernisse bei schweren psychischen Erkrankungen. Nervenarzt 2005; 76: 809-821
• 17 Lambert M, Karow A, Gallinat J. et al. Evidenzbasierte Implementierung von stationsäquivalenter Behandlung in Deutschland. Psychiat Prax 2017; 44: 62-64
• 18 Noeker M, Juckel G. Implementierung stationsungebundener Leistungen in der Psychiatrie. Nervenarzt 2017; 88: 299-302
• 19 Krumm S, Becker T. Der Einbezug von Nutzern psychiatrischer Angebote in die psychiatrische Versorgungsforschung. Psychiat Prax 2006; 33: 59-66
• 20 Thornicroft G, Tansella M. Growing recognition of the importance of service user involvement in mental health service planning and evaluation. Epidemiol Psichiat S 2005; 14: 1-3
• 21 World Health Organization. Mental Health Declaration for Europe. Facing the Challenges, Building Solutions. Helsinki: 2005
• 22 Stulz N, Nevely A, Hilpert M. et al. Referral to Inpatient Treatment Does not Necessarily Imply a Need for Inpatient Treatment. Adm Policy Ment Hlth 2014; 42: 474-483
• 23 Barbour RS. Checklists for improving rigour in qualitative research: a case of the tail wagging the dog?. BMJ 2001; 322: 1115
• 24 Carpenter RA, Tracy DK. Home treatment teams: what should they do? A qualitative study of patient opinions. J Ment Health 2015; 24: 98-102
• 25 Hubbeling D, Bertram R. Hope, happiness and home treatment: a study into patient satisfaction with being treated at home. Psychiatr Bull 2014; 38: 265-269
• 26 Khalifeh H, Murgatroyd C, Freeman M. et al. Home treatment as an alternative to hospital admission for mothers in a mental health crisis: a qualitative study. Psychiat Serv 2009; 60: 634-639
• 27 Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol 2006; 3: 77-101
• 28 VERBI Software. MAXQDA 2016
• 29 Hopkins C, Niemiec S. Mental health crisis at home: service user perspectives on what helps and what hinders. J Psychiatr Ment Hlt 2007; 14: 310-318
• 30 Karlsson B, Borg M, Kim HS. From good intentions to real life: introducing crisis resolution teams in Norway. Nurs Inq 2008; 15: 206-215
• 31 Magez J, Ruppert D, Valentini J. et al. „Die Krücke steht in der Ecke …“ – Erfahrungen psychisch kranker Menschen in einem Versorgungsmodell der ambulanten sektorenübergreifenden vernetzten Versorgung. Psychiat Prax 2017;