Download PDF
Endoscopy 2018; 50(12): 1186-1204
DOI: 10.1055/a-0755-7515
Guideline
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Performance measures for endoscopy services: a European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Quality Improvement Initiative

Roland Valori
1   Department of Gastroenterology, Gloucestershire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Gloucestershire, UK
,
George Cortas
2   University of Balamand Faculty of Medicine, St. George Hospital University Medical Center, Beirut, Lebanon
,
Thomas de Lange
3   Department of Transplantation, Oslo University Hospital and Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Norway
,
Omer Salem Balfaqih
4   Thamar University, Medical College, Dhamar; and Hadramout University, Medical College, Mukalla, Yemen
,
Marjon de Pater
5   Department of Gastroenterology Endoscopy, Academic Medical Centre Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
,
Pierre Eisendrath
6   Hepatogastroenterology department, CHU Saint-Pierre, Université libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
,
Premysl Falt
7   University Hospital Olomouc, and Faculty of Medicine, Palacky University, Olomouc, Czech Republic; and Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic
,
Irfan Koruk
8   Department of Gastroenterology, Istanbul Bilim University Medical School, Istanbul, Turkey
,
Akiko Ono
9   Unidad de Endoscopia Digestiva, Hospital Clinico Universitario Virgen de la Arrixaca, Murcia, Spain
,
Nadan Rustemović
10   GI Endoscopy Unit, University Hospital Centre Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia
,
Erik Schoon
11   Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
,
Andrew Veitch
12   Department of Gastroenterology, New Cross Hospital, Wolverhampton, UK
,
Carlo Senore
13   CPO Piemonte, AOU Città della Salute e della Scienza, Turin, Italy
,
Cristina Bellisario
13   CPO Piemonte, AOU Città della Salute e della Scienza, Turin, Italy
,
Silvia Minozzi
13   CPO Piemonte, AOU Città della Salute e della Scienza, Turin, Italy
,
Cathy Bennett
14   Office of Research and Innovation, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland Coláiste Ríoga na Máinleá in Éirinn, Dublin, Ireland
,
Michael Bretthauer
15   Clinical Effectiveness Research Group, University of Oslo and Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
,
Mario Dinis-Ribeiro
16   Servicio de Gastroenterologia, Instituto Portugues de Oncologia Francisco Gentil, Porto, Portugal
,
Dirk Domagk
17   Department of Medicine I, Josephs-Hospital Warendorf, Academic Teaching Hospital, University of Muenster, Warendorf, Germany
,
Cesare Hassan
18   Endoscopy Unit, Nuovo Regina Margherita Hospital, Rome, Italy
,
Michal F. Kaminski
19   Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Oncology, Medical Center for Postgraduate Education and Department of Gastroenterological Oncology; and Department of Cancer Prevention, The Maria Sklodowska-Curie Memorial Cancer Center, and Institute of Oncology, Warsaw, Poland; and Department of Health Management and Health Economics, University of Oslo, Norway
,
Colin J. Rees
20   Northern Institute for Cancer Research, Newcastle University, Newcastle, UK
,
Cristiano Spada
21   Digestive Endoscopy and Gastroenterology Unit, Poliambulanza Foundation, Brescia; and Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli – IRCCS, Catholic University, Rome, Italy
,
Raf Bisschops
22   Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology. University Hospital Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
,
Mathew Rutter
20   Northern Institute for Cancer Research, Newcastle University, Newcastle, UK
23   Department of Gastroenterology, University Hospital of North Tees, Stockton-on-Tees, Cleveland, UK
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
13 November 2018 (online)

Also available at
   Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

The European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) and United European Gastroenterology present a list of key performance measures for endoscopy services. We recommend that these performance measures be adopted by all endoscopy services across Europe. The measures include those related to the leadership, organization, and delivery of the service, as well as those associated with the patient journey. Each measure includes a recommendation for a minimum and target standard for endoscopy services to achieve.

We recommend that all stakeholders in endoscopy take note of these ESGE endoscopy services performance measures to accelerate their adoption and implementation. Stakeholders include patients and their advocacy groups; service leaders; staff, including endoscopists; professional societies; payers; and regulators.

 

  • References

  • 1 Corley DA, Jensen CD, Marks AR. Can we improve adenoma detection rates? A systematic review of intervention studies. Gastrointest Endosc 2011; 74: 656-665
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 2 Veitch AM, Uedo N, Yao K. et al. Optimizing early upper gastrointestinal cancer detection at endoscopy. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 2015; 12: 660-667
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 3 Denis B, Gendre I, Sauleau EA. et al. Harms of colonoscopy in a colorectal cancer screening programme with faecal occult blood test: a population-based cohort study. Dig Liver Dis 2013; 45: 474-480
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 4 Rutter MD, Senore C, Bisschops R. et al. The European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Quality Improvement Initiative: developing performance measures. Endoscopy 2016; 48: 81-89
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 5 Day LW, Cohen J, Greenwald D. et al. Quality indicators for gastrointestinal endoscopy units. VideoGIE 2017; 2: 119-140
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 6 Armstrong D, Barkun A, Bridges R. et al. Canadian Association of Gastroenterology consensus guidelines on safety and quality indicators in endoscopy. Can J Gastroenterol 2012; 26: 17-31
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 7 Valori R, Rey JF, Atkin WS. et al. European guidelines for quality assurance in colorectal cancer screening and diagnosis. First Edition--Quality assurance in endoscopy in colorectal cancer screening and diagnosis. Endoscopy 2012; 44 (Suppl. 03) SE88-SE105
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 8 Valori R. Quality Improvements in Endoscopy in England. Techn Gastrointest Endosc 2012; 14: 63-72
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 9 JAG Joint Advisory Group on GI Endoscopy. Joint Advisory Group on Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (JAG) accreditation standards for endoscopy services. Available from: https://www.thejag.org.uk/Downloads/Accreditation/JAG%20accreditation%20standards%20for%20endoscopy%20services.pdf Accessed 15 September 2018
    PubMed
  • 10 Sint Nicolaas J, de Jonge V, Korfage IJ. et al. Benchmarking patient experiences in colonoscopy using the Global Rating Scale. Endoscopy 2012; 44: 462-472
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 11 Sint Nicolaas J, de Jonge V, de Man RA. et al. The Global Rating Scale in clinical practice: a comprehensive quality assurance programme for endoscopy departments. Dig Liver Dis 2012; 44: 919-924
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 12 MacIntosh D, Dube C, Hollingworth R. et al. The endoscopy Global Rating Scale-Canada: development and implementation of a quality improvement tool. Can J Gastroenterol 2013; 27: 74-82
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 13 Segnan N, Patnick J, von Karsa L. , eds. European Guidelines for Quality Assurance in Colorectal Cancer Screening and Diagnosis. 1st. edn. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union: European Commission; 2010
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 14 Brand CA, Barker AL, Morello RT. et al. A review of hospital characteristics associated with improved performance. Int J Qual Health Care 2012; 24: 483-494
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 15 Buljac-Samardzic M, Dekker-van Doorn CM, van Wijngaarden JD. et al. Interventions to improve team effectiveness: a systematic review. Health Policy 2010; 94: 183-195
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 16 Morello RT, Lowthian JA, Barker AL. et al. Strategies for improving patient safety culture in hospitals: a systematic review. BMJ Qual Saf 2013; 22: 11-18
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 17 Parand A, Dopson S, Renz A. et al. The role of hospital managers in quality and patient safety: a systematic review. BMJ Open 2014; 4: e005055
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 18 Suelflow E. Systematic literature review: An analysis of administrative strategies to engage providers in hospital quality initiatives. Health Policy Technol 2016; 5: 2-17
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 19 Wong CA, Cummings GG, Ducharme L. The relationship between nursing leadership and patient outcomes: a systematic review update. J Nurs Manag 2013; 21: 709-724
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 20 Wong CA, Cummings GG. The relationship between nursing leadership and patient outcomes: a systematic review. J Nurs Manag 2007; 15: 508-521
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 21 Kaminski MF, Anderson J, Valori R. et al. Leadership training to improve adenoma detection rate in screening colonoscopy: a randomised trial. Gut 2016; 65: 616-624
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 22 Davey P, Brown E, Charani E. et al. Interventions to improve antibiotic prescribing practices for hospital inpatients. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2013;
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 23 Ivers N, Jamtvedt G, Flottorp S. et al. Audit and feedback: effects on professional practice and healthcare outcomes. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2012;
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 24 Brouwers MC, De Vito C, Bahirathan L. et al. What implementation interventions increase cancer screening rates? a systematic review.. Implement Sci 2011; 6: 111
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 25 Sabatino SA, Habarta N, Baron RC. et al. Interventions to increase recommendation and delivery of screening for breast, cervical, and colorectal cancers by healthcare providers systematic reviews of provider assessment and feedback and provider incentives. Am J Prev Med 2008; 35: S67-S74
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 26 Rees CJ, Thomas-Gibson S, Bourke MJ. et al. Managing under-performance in endoscopy: a pragmatic approach. Gastrointest Endosc 2018; 88: 737-744
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 27 Algie CM, Mahar RK, Wasiak J. et al. Interventions for reducing wrong-site surgery and invasive clinical procedures. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2015;
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 28 Maaskant JM, Vermeulen H, Apampa B. et al. Interventions for reducing medication errors in children in hospital. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2015;
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 29 Parmelli E, Flodgren G, Fraser SG. et al. Interventions to increase clinical incident reporting in health care. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2012;
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 30 McDonald KM, Matesic B, Contopoulos-Ioannidis DG. et al. Patient safety strategies targeted at diagnostic errors: a systematic review. Ann Intern Med 2013; 158: 381-389
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 31 French SD, Green S, Buchbinder R. et al. Interventions for improving the appropriate use of imaging in people with musculoskeletal conditions. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2010;
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 32 Luangasanatip N, Hongsuwan M, Limmathurotsakul D. et al. Comparative efficacy of interventions to promote hand hygiene in hospital: systematic review and network meta-analysis. BMJ 2015; 351: h3728
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 33 Guyatt GH, Schünemann HJ, Djulbegovic B. et al. Guideline panels should not GRADE good practice statements. J Clin Epidemiol 2015; 68: 597-600
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar