Subscribe to RSS
DOI: 10.1055/a-1039-3693
Anstieg der Laienreanimationsrate in Deutschland geht mit vermehrter Telefonreanimation einher
Increase in Bystander-CPR Within a Decade Accompanies Rise in Telephone-CPRPublication History
Publication Date:
04 December 2019 (online)
![](https://www.thieme-connect.de/media/notarzt/201906/lookinside/thumbnails/10-1055-a-1039-3693_no0053-1.jpg)
Zusammenfassung
Ziel der Studie In der vergangenen Dekade wurden Initiativen zur Erhöhung der Laienreanimationsrate ergriffen. Ist die Rate in den letzten 10 Jahren gestiegen? Ist dies assoziiert mit Veränderungen der Leitstellenleistung?
Methodik Analyse prähospitaler Daten des Deutschen Reanimationsregisters. Einschluss von Fällen aus 19 deutschen Standorten zwischen 2008 und 2017. Ausschluss von Herz-Kreislauf-Stillständen nach Eintreffen des Rettungsdienstes, in Arztpraxen oder Kliniken. Analyse mit Chi-Quadrat-Test und Clopper-Pearson-Konfidenzintervallen.
Ergebnisse Analysiert wurden die Daten von 22 555 Patienten. Die Laienreanimationsrate stieg von 23,4% im Jahr 2008 (606 von 2591, 95%-KI: 21,8 – 25,1%) auf 36,9% im Jahr 2017 (1014 von 2749, 95%-KI: 35,1 – 38,7%) (p < 0,001). Gleichzeitig stieg die telefonische Anleitung von 0,4% (11 von 2591, 95%-KI: 0,2 – 0,8%) auf 24,3% (670 von 2749, 95%-KI: 22,8 – 26,0%) (p < 0,001).
Schlussfolgerung Die Laienreanimationsrate stieg um mehr als 50% bei vermehrter Telefonreanimation und Laienschulung. Ein kausaler Zusammenhang lässt sich nicht belegen.
Abstract
Objective In the past decade initiatives to increase bystander-CPR were started. Did the rate increase over the last 10 years in Germany? Is there an association with changes in dispatch-performance?
Methods Analysis of prehospital data of the German Resuscitation Registry. Inclusion of cases from 19 German Emergency Medical Services between 2008 and 2017. Exclusion of cardiac arrests after arrival of the ambulance, at medical practice or hospitals. Processing with chi-square-test and Clopper-Pearson-confidence interval.
Results Analysis of 22 555 data sets. Bystander-CPR-rate increased from 23,4% in 2008 (606 of 2591, 95% CI: 21,8 – 25,1%) to 36,9% in 2017 (1014 of 2749, 95% CI: 35,1 – 38,7%) (p < 0,001). The proportion of telephone-assisted-CPR increased from 0,4% (11 of 2591, 95% CI: 0,2 – 0,8%) in 2008 to 24,3% (670 of 2749, 95% CI: 22,8 – 26,0%) in 2017 (p < 0,001).
Conclusion The rate increased by 50%. This was accompanied by a rise in telephone-CPR and lay training. A causal relationship can not be proven.
-
Literatur
- 1 Wnent J, Gräsner J-T, Seewald S. et al. Jahresbericht des Deutschen Reanimationsregisters Außerklinische Reanimation 2018. Anästh Intensivmed 2019; 60: V91-V93
- 2 Hasselqvist-Ax I, Riva G, Herlitz J. et al. Early cardiopulmonary resuscitation in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. N Engl J Med 2015; 372: 2307-2315 doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1405796
- 3 Waalewijn RA, Tijssen JGP, Koster RW. Bystander initiated actions in out-of-hospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation: results from the Amsterdam Resuscitation Study (ARRESUST). Resuscitation 2001; 50: 273-279 doi:10.1016/S0300-9572(01)00354-9
- 4 Wnent J, Bohn A, Seewald S. et al. Laienreanimation – Einfluss von Erster Hilfe auf das Überleben. Anästhesiol Intensivmed Notfallmed Schmerzther 2013; 48: 562-565 doi:10.1055/s-0033-1355238
- 5 Valenzuela TD, Roe DJ, Cretin S. et al. Estimating Effectiveness of Cardiac Arrest Interventions. Circulation 1997; 96: 3308-3313 doi:10.1161/01.CIR.96.10.3308
- 6 Neukamm J, Gräsner JT, Schewe JC. et al. The impact of response time reliability on CPR incidence and resuscitation success: A benchmark study from the German Resuscitation Registry. Crit Care 2011; 15: R282 doi:10.1186/cc10566
- 7 Park GJ, Song KJ, Shin SD. et al. Timely bystander CPR improves outcomes despite longer EMS times. Am J Emerg Med 2017; 35: 1049-1055 doi:10.1016/j.ajem.2017.02.033
- 8 Bürger A, Wnent J, Bohn A. et al. The Effect of Ambulance Response Time on Survival Following Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest: An Analysis from the German Resuscitation Registry. Dtsch Arztebl Int 2018; 115: 541-548 doi:10.3238/arztebl.2018.0541
- 9 Sasson C, Rogers MAM, Dahl J. et al. Predictors of survival from out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes 2010; 3: 63-81 doi:10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.109.889576
- 10 Tanaka H, Ong MEH, Siddiqui FJ. et al. Modifiable Factors Associated With Survival After Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest in the Pan-Asian Resuscitation Outcomes Study. Ann Emerg Med 2017;
- 11 Mathiesen WT, Bjørshol CA, Kvaløy JT. et al. Effects of modifiable prehospital factors on survival after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in rural versus urban areas. Crit Care 2018; 22: 99 doi:10.1186/s13054-018-2017-x
- 12 Riddersholm S, Kragholm K, Mortensen RN. et al. Association of bystander interventions and hospital length of stay and admission to intensive care unit in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest survivors. Resuscitation 2017; 119: 99-106 doi:10.1016/j.resuscitation.2017.07.014
- 13 Malta Hansen C, Kragholm K, Pearson DA. et al. Association of Bystander and First-Responder Intervention With Survival After Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest in North Carolina, 2010–2013. JAMA 2015; 314: 255-264 doi:10.1001/jama.2015.7938
- 14 Kleinman ME, Brennan EE, Goldberger ZD. et al. Part 5: Adult Basic Life Support and Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Quality: 2015 American Heart Association Guidelines Update for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care. Circulation 2015; 132 (18 Suppl. 2): S414-S435 doi:10.1161/CIR.0000000000000259
- 15 Perkins GD, Travers AH, Berg RA. et al. Part 3: Adult basic life support and automated external defibrillation: 2015 International Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care Science with Treatment Recommendations. Resuscitation 2015; 95: e43-e69 doi:10.1016/j.resuscitation.2015.07.041
- 16 Nolan JP, Soar J, Zideman DA. et al. European Resuscitation Council Guidelines for Resuscitation 2010 Section 1. Executive summary. Resuscitation 2010; 81: 1219-1276 doi:10.1016/j.resuscitation.2010.08.021
- 17 Vaillancourt C, Verma A, Trickett J. et al. Evaluating the Effectiveness of Dispatch-assisted Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Instructions. Acad Emerg Med 2007; 14: 877-883 doi:10.1197/j.aem.2007.06.021
- 18 Svensson L, Bohm K, Castrèn M. et al. Compression-only CPR or standard CPR in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. N Engl J Med 2010; 363: 434-442 doi:10.1056/NEJMoa0908991
- 19 Gräsner J-T, Seewald S, Bohn A. et al. Deutsches Reanimationsregister. Anaesthesist 2014; 63: 470-476 doi:10.1007/s00101-014-2324-9
- 20 Jacobs I, Nadkarni V, Bahr J. et al. Cardiac arrest and cardiopulmonary resuscitation outcome reports: update and simplification of the Utstein templates for resuscitation registries. A statement for healthcare professionals from a task force of the international liaison committee on resuscitation (American Heart Association, European Resuscitation Council, Australian Resuscitation Council, New Zealand Resuscitation Council, Heart and Stroke Foundation of Canada, InterAmerican Heart Foundation, Resuscitation Council of Southern Africa). Resuscitation 2004; 63: 233-249 doi:10.1016/j.resuscitation.2004.09.008
- 21 Marung H, Gräsner JT, Bohn A. et al. Qualitätsmanagement bei der Telefonreanimation – mehr Daten für mehr Überlebende. Notf Rett Med 2015; 18: 299-305 doi:10.1007/s10049-015-0010-3
- 22 Dyson K, Brown SP, May S. et al. International variation in survival after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: A validation study of the Utstein template. Resuscitation 2019; 138: 168-181 doi:10.1016/j.resuscitation.2019.03.018
- 23 Rea TD, Eisenberg MS, Culley LL. et al. Dispatcher-assisted cardiopulmonary resuscitation and survival in cardiac arrest. Circulation 2001; 104: 2513-2516
- 24 Carter WB, Eisenberg MS, Hallstrom AP. et al. Development and implementation of emergency CPR instruction via telephone. Ann Emerg Med 1984; 13 (9 Pt 1): 695-700
- 25 Eisenberg MS, Hallstrom AP, Carter WB. et al. Emergency CPR instruction via telephone. Am J Public Health 1985; 75: 47-50 doi:10.2105/ajph.75.1.47
- 26 Hollenberg J, Herlitz J, Lindqvist J. et al. Improved survival after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest is associated with an increase in proportion of emergency crew–witnessed cases and bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Circulation 2008; 118: 389-396 doi:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.734137
- 27 Kuisma M, Boyd J, Vayrynen T. et al. Emergency call processing and survival from out-of-hospital ventricular fibrillation. Resuscitation 2005; 67: 89-93 doi:10.1016/j.resuscitation.2005.04.008
- 28 Hüpfl M, Selig HF, Nagele P. Chest-compression-only versus standard cardiopulmonary resuscitation: a meta-analysis. Lancet 2010; 376: 1552-1557 doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(10)61454-7
- 29 Berg RA, Kern KB, Hilwig RW. et al. Assisted Ventilation Does Not Improve Outcome in a Porcine Model of Single-Rescuer Bystander Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation. Circulation 1997; 95: 1635-1641 doi:10.1161/01.CIR.95.6.1635
- 30 Kern KB, Hilwig RW, Berg RA. et al. Importance of continuous chest compressions during cardiopulmonary resuscitation: improved outcome during a simulated single lay-rescuer scenario. Circulation 2002; 105: 645-649
- 31 Bouland AJ, Halliday MH, Comer AC. et al. Evaluating Barriers to Bystander CPR among Laypersons before and after Compression-only CPR Training. Prehosp Emerg Care 2017; 21: 662-669 doi:10.1080/10903127.2017.1308605
- 32 Riva G, Ringh M, Jonsson M. et al. Survival in Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest After Standard Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation or Chest Compressions Only Before Arrival of Emergency Medical Services: Nationwide Study During Three Guideline Periods. Circulation 2019;
- 33 Fordyce CB, Hansen CM, Kragholm K. et al. Association of Public Health Initiatives With Outcomes for Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest at Home and in Public Locations. JAMA Cardiol 2017;
- 34 Böttiger BW, Lockey A, Aickin R. et al. Over 675,000 lay people trained in cardiopulmonary resuscitation worldwide – The “World Restart a Heart (WRAH)” initiative 2018. Resuscitation 2019; 138: 15-17 doi:10.1016/j.resuscitation.2019.02.033
- 35 Plant N, Taylor K. How best to teach CPR to schoolchildren: A systematic review. Resuscitation 2013; 84: 415-421 doi:10.1016/j.resuscitation.2012.12.008
- 36 Bohn A, Lukas RP, Breckwoldt J. et al. ʼKids save livesʼ: Why schoolchildren should train in cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Curr Opin Crit Care 2015; 21: 220-225 doi:10.1097/MCC.0000000000000204
- 37 Böttiger BW, Semeraro F, Altemeyer K-H. et al. KIDS SAVE LIVES – Schülerausbildung in Wiederbelebung. Notf Rett Med 2017; 20: 91-96 doi:10.1007/s10049-017-0286-6
- 38 Böttiger BW, van Aken H. Kids save lives–Training school children in cardiopulmonary resuscitation worldwide is now endorsed by the World Health Organization (WHO). Resuscitation 2015; 94: A5-A7 doi:10.1016/j.resuscitation.2015.07.005
- 39 Beskind DL, Stolz U, Thiede R. et al. Viewing an ultra-brief chest compression only video improves some measures of bystander CPR performance and responsiveness at a mass gathering event. Resuscitation 2017; 118: 96-100 doi:10.1016/j.resuscitation.2017.07.011