Subscribe to RSS
DOI: 10.1055/a-1083-6805
Das Mukoepidermoidkarzinom – Bedeutung der Molekularpathologie
Mucoepidermoidcarcinoma – Importance in molecular pathologyPublication History
12 March 2019
16 December 2019
Publication Date:
02 March 2020 (online)
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9917e/9917e553e40121b0a05ad137b0ea4f7d93b7b9b0" alt=""
Zusammenfassung
Das Mukoepidermoidkarzinom ist das häufigste primäre Speicheldrüsenmalignom im Kopf-Hals-Bereich. Das Tumorgrading hat eine erhebliche prognostische Bedeutung. Die 5-Jahres-Überlebensrate ist für Low-grade-Mukoepidermoidkarzinome deutlich höher als für Intermediate-grade- oder High-grade-Mukoepidermoidkarzinome. Für das Mukoepidermoidkarzinom scheint die Translokation von t(11;19)(q21;p13) mit der resultierenden CRTC1-MAML2-Transfusion ebenfalls von prognostischer Relevanz zu sein. Diese Translokation ist in 38–82 % aller Mukoepidermoidkarzinome nachweisbar. In Studien konnte für Patienten mit CRTC1-MAML2-positiven Mukoepidermoidkarzinomen eine deutlich bessere Prognose als für Patienten mit Translokations-negativen Mukoepidermoidkarzinomen nachgewiesen werden. Die t(11;19)(q21;p13) -Translokation wird deutlich häufiger bei Low- und Intermediate-grade-Mukoepidermoidkarzinomen detektiert als bei High-grade-Tumoren derselben Entität. Darüber hinaus wurden Translokations-positive Mukoepidermoidkarzinome häufiger bei jüngeren Patienten, kleineren Tumoren und niedrigeren Tumorstadien diagnostiziert sowie seltener Lymphknoten- und Fernmetastasierung gefunden. Bislang ist die Translokation nicht von therapeutischer Bedeutung. Jedoch sollte aufgrund der prognostischen Relevanz eine Diagnostik regelhaft erfolgen. Bei Grenzfällen kann der fehlende Nachweis der Translokation eine Entscheidungshilfe zu einer Therapieeskalation geben. Um den individuellen prognostischen und therapeutischen Wert des Fusionsgens genauer zu beurteilen, werden weitere Untersuchungen notwendig sein.
Abstract
Mucoepidermoid carcinoma is the most common primary salivary gland malignancy and its tumor grading has an important prognostic significance. The 5 year overall survival rate is significantly higher for low grade mucoepidermoid carcinomas than for intermediate grade and high grade mucoepidermoid carcinomas. The translocation of t(11;19)(q21;p13) with the resulting CRTC1-MAML2 transfusion appears to be of prognostic relevance in patients with mucoepidermoid carcinoma. The translocation is detectable in 38–82 % of all mucoepidermoid carcinomas. Study results have shown a significantly better prognosis for patients with fusion-positive mucoepidermoid carcinomas than fusion-negative mucoepidermoid carcinomas. The t(11;19)(q21;p13) translocation can be found more often in low and intermediate grade mucoepidermoid carcinomas than in high grade tumors of the same entity. Moreover, fusion positive mucoepidermoid carcinoma were found more frequently in younger patients, smaller tumors, lower tumor stages and less frequently lymph node and distant metastases. Up to now, the translocation has not been of therapeutic importance. In selected cases, the lack of t(11;19)(q21;p13) translocation might facilitate the decision towards further escalation of therapy. More studies will be necessary to evaluate the individual prognostic and therapeutic value of CRTC1-MAML2 transfusion.
-
Literatur
- 1 El-Naggar AK, Chan JKC, Grandis JR. et al. WHO Classification of Head and Neck Tumours. 4th. edition. Lyon: International Agency for Research on Cancer; 2017
- 2 Stenner M, Molls C, Klußmann JP. et al. Zur Prognose chirurgisch therapierter primärer Parotiskarzinome – eine Untersuchung an 231 Fällen. Laryngo-Rhino-Otologie 2011; 90: 664-671
- 3 Okumura Y, Miyabe S, Nakayama T. et al. Impact of CRTC1/3-MAML2 fusions on histological classification and prognosis of mucoepidermoid carcinoma: Mucoepidermoid carcinoma classification. Histopathology 2011; 59: 90-97
- 4 Aro K, Leivo I, Mäkitie AA. Management and Outcome of Patients with Mucoepidermoid Carcinoma of Major Salivary Gland Origin: A Single Institution’s 30-Year Experience. Laryngoscope 2008; 118: 258-262
- 5 Pires FR, Paes de Almeida O, Cavalcanti de Araújo V. et al. Prognostic Factors in Head and Neck Mucoepidermoid Carcinoma. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2004; 130: 174
- 6 Tirado Y, Williams MD, Hanna EY. et al. CRTC1/MAML2 fusion transcript in high grade mucoepidermoid carcinomas of salivary and thyroid glands and Warthin’s tumors: Implications for histogenesis and biologic behavior. Genes Chromosomes Cancer 2007; 46: 708-715
- 7 Anzick SL, Chen WD, Park Y. et al. Unfavorable prognosis of CRTC1-MAML2 positive mucoepidermoid tumors with CDKN2A deletions. Genes Chromosomes Cancer 2010; 49: 59-69
- 8 Behboudi A, Enlund F, Winnes M. et al. Molecular classification of mucoepidermoid carcinomas. Prognostic significance of the MECT1–MAML2 fusion oncogene. Genes Chromosomes Cancer 2006; 45: 470-481
- 9 Seethala RR. An Update on Grading of Salivary Gland Carcinomas. Head Neck Pathol 2009; 3: 69-77
- 10 Nordkvist A, Gustafsson H, Juberg-Ode M. et al. Recurrent rearrangements of 11q14-22 in mucoepidermoid carcinoma. Cancer Genet Cytogenet 1994; 74: 77-83
- 11 Luk PP, Wykes J, Selinger CI. et al. Diagnostic and prognostic utility of Mastermind-like 2 (MAML2) gene rearrangement detection by fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) in mucoepidermoid carcinoma of the salivary glands. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol 2016; 121: 530-541
- 12 Okumura Y, Murase T, Saida K. et al. Postoperative radiotherapy for T1/2N0M0 mucoepidermoid carcinoma positive for CRTC1/3-MAML2 fusions. Head Neck 2018; 40: 2565-2573
- 13 Li L, Tang P, Li S. et al. Notch signaling pathway networks in cancer metastasis: a new target for cancer therapy. Med Oncol 2017; 34
- 14 Yan K, Yesensky J, Hasina R. et al. Genomics of mucoepidermoid and adenoid cystic carcinomas: Salivary Gland Genomics. Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol 2018; 3: 56-61
- 15 Chen Z, Chen J, Gu Y. et al. Aberrantly activated AREG–EGFR signaling is required for the growth and survival of CRTC1–MAML2 fusion-positive mucoepidermoid carcinoma cells. Oncogene 2014; 33: 3869-3877
- 16 Lujan B, Hakim S, Moyano S. et al. Activation of the EGFR/ERK pathway in high-grade mucoepidermoid carcinomas of the salivary glands. Br J Cancer 2010; 103: 510-516
- 17 Kang H, Tan M, Bishop JA. et al. Whole-Exome Sequencing of Salivary Gland Mucoepidermoid Carcinoma. Clin Cancer Res 2017; 23: 283-288
- 18 Tonon G, Modi S, Wu L. et al. t(11;19)(q21;p13) translocation in mucoepidermoid carcinoma creates a novel fusion product that disrupts a Notch signaling pathway. Nat Genet 2003; 33: 208-213
- 19 Jaskoll T, Htet K, Abichaker G. et al. CRTC1 expression during normal and abnormal salivary gland development supports a precursor cell origin for mucoepidermoid cancer. Gene Expr Patterns 2011; 11: 57-63
- 20 Nakayama T, Miyabe S, Okabe M. et al. Clinicopathological significance of the CRTC3–MAML2 fusion transcript in mucoepidermoid carcinoma. Mod Pathol 2009; 22: 1575-1581
- 21 Xu L, Tang H, Chen DW. et al. Retracted: Genome-wide association study identifies common genetic variants associated with salivary gland carcinoma and its subtypes: GWAS of Salivary Gland Carcinoma. Cancer 2015; 121: 2367-2374
- 22 Saade RE, Bell D, Garcia J. et al. Role of CRTC1/MAML2 Translocation in the Prognosis and Clinical Outcomes of Mucoepidermoid Carcinoma. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2016; 142: 234
- 23 Birkeland AC, Foltin SK, Michmerhuizen NL. et al. Correlation of Crtc1/3-Maml2 fusion status, grade and survival in mucoepidermoid carcinoma. Oral Oncol 2017; 68: 5-8
- 24 Coxon A, Rozenblum E, Park YS. et al. Mect1-Maml2 Fusion Oncogene Linked to the Aberrant Activation of Cyclic AMP/CREB Regulated Genes. Cancer Res 2005; 65: 7137-7144