Download PDF
Int J Sports Med 2021; 42(09): 794-802
DOI: 10.1055/a-1323-3456
Training & Testing

Load-velocity Profiles Change after Training Programs with Different Set Configurations

Eliseo Iglesias-Soler 
1   Performance and Health Group, Department of Physical Education and Sport, Faculty of Sports Sciences and Physical Education, University of A Coruna, A Coruña, Spain
,
Jessica Rial-Vázquez
1   Performance and Health Group, Department of Physical Education and Sport, Faculty of Sports Sciences and Physical Education, University of A Coruna, A Coruña, Spain
,
Daniel Boullosa
2   INISA, Federal University of Mato Grosso do Sul, Campo Grande, Brazil
,
Xian Mayo
3   Observatory of Healthy and Active Living of Spain Active Foundation, Centre for Sport Studies, King Juan Carlos University, Madrid, Spain
,
Juan Fariñas
1   Performance and Health Group, Department of Physical Education and Sport, Faculty of Sports Sciences and Physical Education, University of A Coruna, A Coruña, Spain
,
María Rúa-Alonso
1   Performance and Health Group, Department of Physical Education and Sport, Faculty of Sports Sciences and Physical Education, University of A Coruna, A Coruña, Spain
,
Luis Santos
4   Department of Physical Education and Sport, University of León, León, Spain
› Author Affiliations
› Further Information
Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

This study explored the changes in load-velocity relationship of bench press and parallel squat exercises following two programs differing in the set configuration. A randomized controlled trial was carried out in a sample of 39 physically active individuals. Participants were assigned to rest redistribution set configuration, traditional set configuration, or control groups. Over 5 weeks, the experimental groups completed 10 sessions with the 10 repetitions maximum load of both exercises. Rest redistribution sets consisted in 16 sets of 2 repetitions with 60 s of rest between sets, and 5 min between exercises, whereas traditional sets entailed 4 sets of 8 repetitions with 5 min of rest between sets and exercises. The load-velocity relationships of both exercises were obtained before and after the training period. For bench press, an increase of the velocity axis intercept, and a decrease of the slope at post-test were observed in both rest redistribution (p<0.001, G=1.264; p<0.001; G=0.997) and traditional set (p=0.01, G=0.654; p=0.001; G=0.593) groups. For squat, the slope decreased (p<0.001; G=0.588) and the velocity axis intercept increased (p<0.001; G=0.727) only in the rest redistribution group. These results show that rest redistribution sets were particularly efficient for inducing changes in the load-velocity relationship.

Key words

cluster training - strength training - resistance training - mechanical profile - set structure


Publication History

Received: 05 August 2020

Accepted: 19 November 2020

Article published online:
22 December 2020

© 2020. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany

 

  • References

  • 1 Crewther B, Cronin J, Keogh J. Possible stimuli for strength and power adaptation: acute mechanical responses. Sports Med 2005; 35: 967-989
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 2 Kawamori N, Newton RU. Velocity specificity of resistance training: actual movement velocity versus intention to move explosively. Strength Cond J 2006; 28: 86-91
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 3 Behm DG, Sale DG. Velocity specificity of resistance training. Sports Med 1993; 15: 374-388
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 4 Iglesias-Soler E, Mayo X, Rio-Rodriguez D. et al. Inter-repetition rest training and traditional set configuration produce similar strength gains without cortical adaptations. J Sports Sci 2016; 34: 1473-1484
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 5 Haff G, Hobbs R, Haff E. et al. Cluster training: a novel method for introducing training program variation. Strength Cond J 2008; 30: 67-76
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 6 Jukic I, Ramos AG, Helms ER. et al. Acute effects of cluster and rest redistribution set structures on mechanical, metabolic, and perceptual fatigue during and after resistance training: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Sports Med 2020; 50: 2209-2236
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 7 Latella C, Teo WP, Drinkwater EJ. et al. The acute neuromuscular responses to cluster set resistance training: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Sports Med 2019; 49: 1861-1877
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 8 Tufano JJ, Brown LE, Haff GG. Theoretical and practical aspects of different cluster set structures: A systematic review. J Strength Cond Res 2017; 31: 848-867
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 9 Steele J. Intensity; in-ten-si-ty; noun. 1. Often used ambiguously within resistance training. 2. Is it time to drop the term altogether?. Br J Sports Med 2014; 48: 1586-1588
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 10 Gonzalez-Badillo JJ, Sanchez-Medina L. Movement velocity as a measure of loading intensity in resistance training. Int J Sports Med 2010; 31: 347-352
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 11 Gonzalez-Badillo JJ, Marques MC, Sanchez-Medina L. The importance of movement velocity as a measure to control resistance training intensity. J Hum Kinet 2011; 29A: 15-19
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 12 Martinez-Cava A, Moran-Navarro R, Sanchez-Medina L. et al. Velocity- and power-load relationships in the half, parallel and full back squat. J Sports Sci 2019; 37: 1088-1096
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 13 Sanchez-Medina L, Gonzalez-Badillo JJ, Perez CE. et al. Velocity- and power-load relationships of the bench pull vs. bench press exercises. Int J Sports Med 2014; 35: 209-216
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 14 Torrejon A, Balsalobre-Fernandez C, Haff GG. et al. The load-velocity profile differs more between men and women than between individuals with different strength levels. Sports Biomech 2019; 18: 245-255
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 15 Pestana-Melero FL, Haff GG, Rojas FJ. et al. Reliability of the load-velocity relationship obtained through linear and polynomial regression models to predict the 1-repetition maximum load. J Appl Biomech 2018; 34: 184-190
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 16 Hughes LJ, Banyard HG, Dempsey AR. et al. Using a load-velocity relationship to predict one repetition maximum in free-weight exercise: a comparison of the different methods. J Strength Cond Res 2019; 33: 2409-2419
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 17 Garcia-Ramos A, Suzovic D, Perez-Castilla A. The load-velocity profiles of three upper-body pushing exercises in men and women. Sports Biomech 2019; [Epub Ahead of Print]
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 18 Iglesias-Soler E, Mayo X, Rial-Vazquez J. et al. Inter-individual variability in the load-velocity relationship is detected by multilevel mixed regression models. Sports Biomech 2018;
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 19 Iglesias-Soler E, Mayo X, Rial-Vazquez J. et al. Reliability of force-velocity parameters obtained from linear and curvilinear regressions for the bench press and squat exercises. J Sports Sci 2019; 37: 2596-2603
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 20 Banyard HG, Nosaka K, Vernon AD. et al. The reliability of individualized load-velocity profiles. Int J Sports Physiol Perform 2018; 13: 763-769
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 21 Giroux C, Rabita G, Chollet D. et al. Optimal balance between force and velocity differs among world-class athletes. J Appl Biomech 2016; 32: 59-68
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 22 Nikolaidis PT. Age- and sex-related differences in force-velocity characteristics of upper and lower limbs of competitive adolescent swimmers. J Hum Kinet 2012; 32: 87-95
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 23 Garcia-Ramos A, Pestana-Melero FL, Perez-Castilla A. et al. Differences in the load-velocity profile between 4 bench-press variants. Int J Sports Physiol Perform 2018; 13: 326-331
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 24 Ruf L, Chery C, Taylor KL. Validity and reliability of the load-velocity relationship to predict the one-repetition maximum in deadlift. J Strength Cond Res 2018; 32: 681-689
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 25 Fernandes JFT, Lamb KL, Twist C. A comparison of load-velocity and load-power relationships between well-trained young and middle-aged males during three popular resistance exercises. J Strength Cond Res 2018; 32: 1440-1447
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 26 Garcia-Ramos A, Ulloa-Diaz D, Barboza-Gonzalez P. et al. Assessment of the load-velocity profile in the free-weight prone bench pull exercise through different velocity variables and regression models. PLoS One 2019; 14: e0212085
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 27 Davies TB, Halaki M, Orr R. et al. Changes in bench press velocity and power after 8 weeks of high-load cluster- or traditional-set structures. J Strength Cond Res 2020; 34: 2734-2742
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 28 Moss BM, Refsnes PE, Abildgaard A. et al. Effects of maximal effort strength training with different loads on dynamic strength, cross-sectional area, load-power and load-velocity relationships. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol 1997; 75: 193-199
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 29 Perez-Castilla A, Garcia-Ramos A. Changes in the load-velocity profile following power- and strength-oriented resistance-training programs. Int J Sports Physiol Perform 2020; [Epub Ahead of Print]
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 30 Harriss DJ, MacSween A, Atkinson G. Ethical standards in sport and exercise science research: 2020 update. Int J Sports Med 2019; 40: 813-817
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 31 Sanchez-Medina L, Perez CE, Gonzalez-Badillo JJ. Importance of the propulsive phase in strength assessment. Int J Sports Med 2010; 31: 123-129
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 32 Jidovtseff B, Harris NK, Crielaard JM. et al. Using the load-velocity relationship for 1RM prediction. J Strength Cond Res 2011; 25: 267-270
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 33 Noguchi K, Gel Y, Brunner E. et al. nparLD: An R software package for the nonparametric analysis of longitudinal data in factorial experiments. J Stat Softw 2012; 50: 1-23
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 34 Sanchez-Medina L, Gonzalez-Badillo JJ. Velocity loss as an indicator of neuromuscular fatigue during resistance training. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2011; 43: 1725-1734
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 35 Pareja-Blanco F, Alcazar J, Sánchez-Valdepeñas J. et al. Velocity loss as a critical variable determining the adaptations to strength training. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2020; 52: 1752-1762
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 36 Pareja-Blanco F, Alcazar J, Cornejo-Daza PJ. et al. Effects of velocity loss in the bench press exercise on strength gains, neuromuscular adaptations and muscle hypertrophy. Scand J Med Sci Sports 2020; 30: 2154-2166
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar