Die Rolle der Stimulationsart für den weiblichen Orgasmus: Psychometrische Eigenschaften der deutschsprachigen Version der Female Orgasm Scale (FOS) und der Clitoris Self-Stimulation Scale (CSSS)

Zusammenfassung

Einleitung Ob Frauen Orgasmen erleben und welche subjektive Bedeutung diese haben, kann deutlich nach Stimulationsart variieren. Trotzdem wird Orgasmuserleben in Fragebögen häufig eindimensional erfasst, ohne auf die Stimulationsart einzugehen, was zu Verzerrungen der Antworten führen kann. Auch ob der Orgasmus eigenverantwortlich angestrebt wird, bleibt unbeachtet.

Forschungsziele Das Ziel dieser Studie ist es, eine sprachlich adaptierte Version der Female Orgasm Scale (FOS) und der Clitoris Self-Stimulation Scale (CSSS) zu erstellen und eine psychometrische Überprüfung an einer deutschen Stichprobe vorzunehmen.

Methoden Die Female Orgasm Scale (FOS) erfasst, wie regelmäßig Orgasmen durch verschiedene Stimulationsarten (vaginaler Geschlechtsverkehr mit und ohne zusätzliche Klitorisstimulation, Stimulation durch die Hand des Partners, Oralsex, Selbststimulation) erlebt werden, sowie die Zufriedenheit mit Anzahl und Qualität der Orgasmen. Die Clitoris Self-Stimulation Scale (CSSS) erfasst das Verhalten, den Affekt und die Einstellung bezüglich Klitorisselbststimulation, um beim Sex mit dem Partner einen Orgasmus zu erleben. Mittels einer Online-Umfrage, die 412 Frauen bearbeiteten, wurden die Instrumente deskriptiv und faktorenanalytisch überprüft.

Ergebnisse Es ergaben sich überwiegend gute Testgütekriterien, die interne Konsistenz der FOS-D ergab α = .77 und die der CSSS-D α = .81. Für die FOS-D konnten zwei Faktoren extrahiert werden: 1. Orgasmuskonsistenz durch vaginale Penetration und Orgasmuszufriedenheit und 2. Orgasmuskonsistenz durch klitorale Stimulationsarten. Für die CSSS-D ergab sich nur ein Faktor.

Schlussfolgerung Die Instrumente können die Diagnostik und Therapie von sexuellen Funktionsstörungen der Frau unterstützen, da sie ein differenziertes Bild des Orgasmuserlebens sowie des damit verbundenen Verhaltens bei partnerschaftlicher Sexualität liefern.

Abstract

Introduction The type of sexual stimulation is important for orgasm frequency in women. This point is often missed in questionnaires, as is the question as to whether women take action themselves to ensure their own orgasm. A more differentiated view of the experience and behavior associated with female orgasm is therefore required.

Objectives The aim of the study is to create a linguistically adapted version of the Female Orgasm Scale (FOS) and the Clitoris Self-Stimulation Scale (CSSS) as well as the evaluation of psychometric properties in a German sample.

Methods The Female Orgasm Scale (FOS) discriminates between orgasm consistency through different types of stimulation (penile-vaginal intercourse with and without additional clitoral stimulation, stimulation by partner’s hand, oral sex, self-stimulation) and satisfaction with quantity and quality of orgasms. The Clitoral Self-Stimulation Scale (CSSS) measures behavior, affect, and attitude regarding clitoral self-stimulation in partnered sexuality. The scales were tested in a cross-sectional online survey with 412 women.

Results The internal consistency for FOS-D was acceptable for the total scale (α ≥ .77). For CSSS-D, the internal consistency was good (α = .81). Two factors could be extracted for FOS-D (German FOS): 1. orgasm consistency by vaginal penetration and orgasm satisfaction, and 2. orgasm consistency by clitoral stimulation types. The CSSS-D (German CSSS) yielded only one factor.

Conclusion The FOS-D and the CSSS-D provide adequate measures for a better understanding of female sexuality and seem to be useful instruments for the assessment, treatment, and general research of sexual health.

Schlüsselwörter

Fragebogen - Geschlechtsverkehr - Klitoris - Orgasmus - weibliche Sexualität

Key words

clitoris - female sexuality - orgasm - penile-vaginal intercourse - questionnaire

Publication History

Article published online:
09 June 2021

• Literatur

• 1 Abdolrasulnia M, Shewchuk RM, Roepke N. et al. Management of Female Sexual Problems: Perceived Barriers, Practice Patterns, and Confidence among Primary Care Physicians and Gynecologists. J Sex Med 2010; 7: 2499-2508
• 2 Andrejek N, Fetner T. The Gender Gap in Orgasms: Survey Data from a Mid-Sized Canadian City. Int J Sex Health 2019; 31: 26-35
• 3 Annon JS. The PLISSIT Model: A Proposed Conceptual Scheme for the Behavioral Treatment of Sexual Problems. J Sex Educ Ther 1976; 2: 1-15
• 4 Bell SN, McClelland SI. When, If, and How: Young Women Contend with Orgasmic Absence. J Sex Res 2018; 55: 679-691
• 5 Berner M, Kriston L, Zahradnik HP. et al. Überprüfung der Gültigkeit und Zuverlässigkeit des deutschen Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI-d). Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd 2004; 64: 293-303
• 6 Blair KL, Cappell J, Pukall CF. Not All Orgasms Were Created Equal: Differences in Frequency and Satisfaction of Orgasm Experiences by Sexual Activity in Same-Sex versus Mixed-Sex Relationships. J Sex Res 2017; 55: 719-733
• 7 Brenk-Franz K, Strauß B. Der Fragebogen zu sexuellen Bedenken (FSB) – Evaluation of the German Version of Attitude Related to Sexual Concerns Scale (ASCS). Sexuologie 2017; 24: 53-61
• 8 Cormier LA, O’Sullivan LF. Anti-Climactic: Investigating How Late Adolescents Perceive and Deal with Orgasm Difficulty in the Context of Their Intimate Relationships. Can J Hum Sex 2018; 27: 111-122
• 9 Cowden CR, Koch PB. Attitudes Related to Sexual Concerns: Gender and Orientation Comparisons. J Sex Educ Ther 1995; 21: 78-87
• 10 Cuntim M, Nobre P. The Role of Cognitive Distraction on Female Orgasm. Sexologies 2011; 20: 212-214
• 11 De Sutter P, Day J, Adam F. Who Are the Orgasmic Women? Exploratory Study among a Community Sample of French-Speaking Women. Sexologies 2014; 23: e51-e57
• 12 Dunn KM, Cherkas LF, Spector TD. Genetic Influences on Variation in Female Orgasmic Function: A Twin Study. Biol Lett 2005; 1: 260-263
• 13 Ejder Apay S, Nagorska M, Balcı Akpınar R. et al. Student Comparison of Sexual Myths: Two-Country Case. Sex Disabil 2013; 31: 249-262
• 14 Frederick DA, John HKS, Garcia JR. et al. Differences in Orgasm Frequency among Gay, Lesbian, Bisexual, and Heterosexual Men and Women in a US National Sample. Arch Sex Behav 2018; 47: 273-288
• 15 Frederick DA, Lever J, Gillespie BJ. et al. What Keeps Passion Alive? Sexual Satisfaction Is Associated with Sexual Communication, Mood Setting, Sexual Variety, Oral Sex, Orgasm, and Sex Frequency in a National US Study. J Sex Res 2017; 5: 186-201
• 16 Galinsky AM. Sexual Touching and Difficulties with Sexual Arousal and Orgasm among US Older Adults. Arch Sex Behav 2012; 41: 875-890
• 17 Herbenick D, Fu TC, Arter J. et al. Women’s Experiences with Genital Touching, Sexual Pleasure, and Orgasm: Results from a U. S. Probability Sample of Women Ages 18 to 94. J Sex Marital Ther 2018; 4: 201-212
• 18 Hoy M, Strauß B, Kröger C. et al. Überprüfung der deutschen Kurzversion der „New Sexual Satisfaction Scale “(NSSS-SD) in einer repräsentativen Stichprobe. Psychother Psychosom Med Psychol 2019; 69: 129-135
• 19 Kaplan HS. Sexualtherapie bei Störungen des sexuellen Verlangens. Stuttgart: Thieme; 2006
• 20 Kaplan KJ. On the Ambivalence-Indifference Problem in Attitude Theory and Measurement: A Suggested Modification of the Semantic Differential Technique. Psychol Bull 1972; 77: 361-372
• 21 Kontula O, Miettinen A. Determinants of Female Sexual Orgasms. Socioaffect Neurosci Psychol 2016; 6: 31624
• 22 Laan E, Rellini AH, Barnes T. Standard Operating Procedures for Female Orgasmic Disorder: Consensus of the International Society for Sexual Medicine. J Sex Med 2013; 10: 74-82
• 23 Leiner DJ. SoSci Survey (Version 2.5. 00-i). Computer Software. München: SoSci Survey GmbH; 2014 [Online unter:]
• 24 Lewis RW, Fugl-Meyer KS, Corona G. et al. Definitions/Epidemiology/Risk Factors for Sexual Dysfunction. J Sex Med 2010; 7: 1598-1607
• 25 Mah K, Binik YM. Are Orgasms in the Mind or the Body? Psychosocial versus Physiological Correlates of Orgasmic Pleasure and Satisfaction. J Sex Marital Ther 2005; 31: 187-200
• 26 McIntyre-Smith A, Fisher WA. Clitoral Self-Stimulation Scale. In: Fisher TD, Davis CM, Yarber WL. et al., Hrsg. Handbook of Sexuality-Related Measures. Third Edition. New York, NY: Routledge; 2011. a 561-563
• 27 McIntyre-Smith A, Fisher WA. Female Orgasm Scale. In: Fisher TD, Davis CM, Yarber WL. et al., Hrsg. Handbook of Sexuality-Related Measures. Third Edition. New York, NY: Routledge; 2011. b 503-505
• 28 Möhring W, Schlütz D. Handbuch standardisierte Erhebungsverfahren in der Kommunikationswissenschaft. Wiesbaden: Springer VS; 2013
• 29 Nemati ALJ, Weitkamp K. The Female Orgasmic State and the Different Dimensions of the Female Sexual Experience: Lessons Learned from Expert Interviews. Sex Relation Ther. 2020
• 30 Philippsohn S, Heiser K, Hartmann U. Sexual Satisfaction and Sexual Myths among Women: Results of a Survey on the Determinants of Sexual Satisfaction. Sexuologie 2003; 9: 148-154
• 31 Prause N, Kuang L, Lee P. et al. Clitorally Stimulated Orgasms Are Associated with Better Control of Sexual Desire, and Not Associated with Depression or Anxiety, Compared with Vaginally Stimulated Orgasms. J Sex Med 2016; 13: 1676-1685
• 32 Rosen R, Brown C, Heiman J. et al. The Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI): A Multidimensional Self-Report Instrument for the Assessment of Female Sexual Function. J Sex Marital Ther 2000; 26: 191-208
• 33 Rowland DL, Kolba TN. Understanding Orgasmic Difficulty in Women. J Sex Med 2016; 13: 1246-1254
• 34 Sanchez DT, Kiefer AK, Ybarra O. Sexual Submissiveness in Women: Costs for Sexual Autonomy and Arousal. Pers Soc Psychol Bull 2006; 32: 512-524
• 35 Schmitt N. Uses and Abuses of Coefficient Alpha. Psychol Assess 1996; 8: 350-353
• 36 Shirazi T, Renfro KJ, Lloyd E. et al. Women’s Experience of Orgasm during Intercourse: Question Semantics Affect Women’s Reports and Men’s Estimates of Orgasm Occurrence. Arch Sex Behav 2018; 47: 605-613
• 37 Stulhofer A, Busko V, Brouillard P. Development and Bicultural Validation of the New Sexual Satisfaction Scale. J Sex Res 2010; 47: 257-26
• 38 Tavares IM, Laan ETM, Nobre PJ. Cognitive-Affective Dimensions of Female Orgasm: The Role of Automatic Thoughts and Affect during Sexual Activity. J Sex Med 2017; 14: 818-828
• 39 Wallen K, Lloyd EA. Female Sexual Arousal: Genital Anatomy and Orgasm in Intercourse. Horm Behav 2011; 5: 780-792
• 40 Willis M, Jozkowski KN, Lo WJ. et al. Are Women’s Orgasms Hindered by Phallocentric Imperatives?. Arch Sex Behav 2018; 47: 1565-1576