Subscribe to RSS
DOI: 10.1055/a-2129-7254
Texture and color enhancement imaging versus high definition white-light endoscopy for detection of colorectal neoplasia: a randomized trial
Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Registration number (trial ID): NCT04892966 Type of study: Prospective, Randomized, Multicentric
Abstract
Background Texture and color enhancement imaging (TXI) was recently proposed as a substitute for standard high definition white-light imaging (WLI) to increase lesion detection during colonoscopy. This international, multicenter randomized trial assessed the efficacy of TXI in detection of colorectal neoplasia.
Methods Consecutive patients aged ≥ 40 years undergoing screening, surveillance, or diagnostic colonoscopies at five centers (Italy, Germany, Japan) between September 2021 and May 2022 were enrolled. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to TXI or WLI. Primary outcome was adenoma detection rate (ADR). Secondary outcomes were adenomas per colonoscopy (APC) and withdrawal time. Relative risks (RRs) adjusted for age, sex, and colonoscopy indication were calculated.
Results We enrolled 747 patients (mean age 62.3 [SD 9.5] years, 50.2 % male). ADR was significantly higher with TXI (221/375, 58.9 %) vs. WLI (159/372, 42.7 %; adjusted RR 1.38 [95 %CI 1.20–1.59]). This was significant for ≤ 5 mm (RR 1.42 [1.16–1.73]) and 6–9 mm (RR 1.36 [1.01–1.83]) adenomas. A higher proportion of polypoid (151/375 [40.3 %] vs. 104/372 [28.0 %]; RR 1.43 [1.17–1.75]) and nonpolypoid (136/375 [36.3 %] vs. 102/372 [27.4 %]; RR 1.30 [1.05–1.61]) adenomas, and proximal (143/375 [38.1 %] vs. 111/372 [29.8 %]; RR 1.28 [1.05–1.57]) and distal (144/375 [38.4 %] vs. 98/372 [26.3 %]; RR 1.46 [1.18–1.80]) lesions were found with TXI. APC was higher with TXI (1.36 [SD 1.79] vs. 0.89 [SD 1.35]; incident rate ratio 1.53 [1.25–1.88]).
Conclusions TXI increased ADR and APC among patients undergoing colonoscopy for various indications. TXI increased detection of polyps < 10 mm, both in the proximal and distal colon, and may help to improve colonoscopy quality indicators.
Publication History
Received: 26 March 2023
Accepted after revision: 14 July 2023
Accepted Manuscript online:
14 July 2023
Article published online:
07 September 2023
© 2023. Thieme. All rights reserved.
Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany
-
References
- 1 Zauber AG, Winawer SJ, O’Brien MJ. et al. Colonoscopic polypectomy and long-term prevention of colorectal-cancer deaths. N Engl J Med 2012; 366: 687-696
- 2 Brenner H, Chang-Claude J, Seiler CM. et al. Protection from colorectal cancer after colonoscopy: a population-based, case–control study. Ann Intern Med 2011; 154: 22-30
- 3 Kaminski MF, Regula J, Kraszewska E. et al. Quality indicators for colonoscopy and the risk of interval cancer. N Engl J Med 2010; 362: 1795-1803
- 4 Corley DA, Jensen CD, Marks AR. et al. Adenoma detection rate and risk of colorectal cancer and death. N Engl J Med 2014; 370: 1298-1306
- 5 Zhao S, Wang S, Pan P. et al. Magnitude, risk factors, and factors associated with adenoma miss rate of tandem colonoscopy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Gastroenterology 2019; 156: 1661-1674.e11
- 6 le Clercq CMC, Bouwens MWE, Rondagh EJA. et al. Postcolonoscopy colorectal cancers are preventable: a population-based study. Gut 2014; 63: 957-963
- 7 Anderson R, Burr NE, Valori R. Causes of post-colonoscopy colorectal cancers based on world endoscopy organization system of analysis. Gastroenterology 2020; 158: 1287-1299.e2
- 8 Facciorusso A, Triantafyllou K, Murad MH. et al. Compared abilities of endoscopic techniques to increase colon adenoma detection rates: a network meta-analysis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2019; 17: 2439-2454.e25
- 9 Thayalasekaran S, Frazzoni L, Antonelli G. et al. Endoscopic technological innovations for neoplasia detection in organized colorectal cancer screening programs: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Gastrointest Endosc 2020; 92: 840-847.e9
- 10 Hassan C, Spadaccini M, Iannone A. et al. Performance of artificial intelligence in colonoscopy for adenoma and polyp detection: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Gastrointest Endosc 2021; 93: 77-85.e6
- 11 Spadaccini M, Iannone A, Maselli R. et al. Computer-aided detection versus advanced imaging for detection of colorectal neoplasia: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol 2021; 6: 793-802
- 12 Bisschops R, East JE, Hassan C. et al. Advanced imaging for detection and differentiation of colorectal neoplasia: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Guideline – update 2019. Endoscopy 2019; 51: 1155-1179
- 13 Paggi S, Radaelli F, Senore C. et al. Linked-color imaging versus white-light colonoscopy in an organized colorectal cancer screening program. Gastrointest Endosc 2020; 92: 723-730
- 14 Atkinson NSS, Ket S, Bassett P. et al. Narrow-band imaging for detection of neoplasia at colonoscopy: a meta-analysis of data from individual patients in randomized controlled trials. Gastroenterology 2019; 157: 462-471
- 15 Sato T. TXI: Texture and color enhancement imaging for endoscopic image enhancement. J Healthc Eng 2021; 2021: 5518948
- 16 Moher D, Hopewell S, Schulz KF. et al. CONSORT 2010 Explanation and Elaboration: Updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. J Clin Epidemiol 2010; 63: e1-37
- 17 Lai EJ, Calderwood AH, Doros G. et al. The Boston Bowel Preparation Scale: a valid and reliable instrument for colonoscopy-oriented research. Gastrointest Endosc 2009; 69: 620-625
- 18 The Paris endoscopic classification of superficial neoplastic lesions. esophagus, stomach, and colon: November 30 to December 1, 2002. Gastrointest Endosc 2003; 58: S3-43
- 19 Schlemper RJ, Riddell RH, Kato Y. et al. The Vienna classification of gastrointestinal epithelial neoplasia. Gut 2000; 47: 251-255
- 20 Hassan C, Antonelli G, Dumonceau J-M. et al. Post-polypectomy colonoscopy surveillance: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Guideline – update 2020. Endoscopy 2020; 52: 687-700
- 21 Chow S-C, Shao J, Wang H, Lokhnygina Y. Sample size calculations in clinical research: 3rd edn. Boca Raton: Chapman & Hall/CRC; 2017
- 22 Gupta S, Lieberman D, Anderson JC. et al. Spotlight: US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer recommendations for follow-up after colonoscopy and polypectomy. Gastroenterology 2020; 158: 1154
- 23 Wisse PHA, Erler NS, de Boer SY. et al. Adenoma detection rate and risk for interval postcolonoscopy colorectal cancer in fecal immunochemical test–based screening: a population-based cohort study. Ann Intern Med 2022; 175: 1366-1373
- 24 Meester RGS, van Herk MMAGC, Lansdorp-Vogelaar I. et al. Prevalence and clinical features of sessile serrated polyps: a systematic review. Gastroenterology 2020; 159: 105-118.e25