Download PDF
Semin Thromb Hemost 2008; 34(4): 380-388
DOI: 10.1055/s-0028-1085481
© Thieme Medical Publishers

Laboratory Testing for Lupus Anticoagulants: Preexamination Variables, Mixing Studies, and Diagnostic Criteria

Marlies R. Ledford-Kraemer1
  • 1President, CLOT-ED, Inc., Emeritus Executive Secretary, NASCOLA, Islamorada, Florida
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
23 September 2008 (online)

    Permissions and Reprints

ABSTRACT

The latest international guidelines for the laboratory diagnosis of lupus anticoagulants (LA) date back to 1995 and are in need of revision. Various patterns of practice and interpretation by clinical laboratories have altered the intent or usage of the criteria and recommendations made at that time. Moreover, various topics in the preexamination phase of LA testing (such as the role of the clinician in test ordering, the impact of direct thrombin inhibitors or oral anticoagulant therapy, and patient biologic variation) need to be considered in future guidelines. In like fashion, examination issues relating to mixing studies will need critical review. Mixing studies have been applied to a variety of low-phospholipid LA screening assays, and no uniformity or standardization exists as to how these test results should be interpreted or if in fact they are suitable for identifying weak lupus anticoagulants.

KEYWORDS

Lupus anticoagulant(s) - lupus anticoagulant testing - mixing studies - preexamination variables - ISTH SSC guidelines

REFERENCES

  • 1 Green D, Hougie C, Kazmier F J et al.. Report of the Working Party on Acquired Inhibitors of Coagulation: studies of the “lupus” anticoagulant.  Thromb Haemost. 1983;  49 144-146
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 2 Exner T, Triplett D A, Taberner D, Machin S J. Guidelines for testing and revised criteria for lupus anticoagulants. SSC Subcommittee for the Standardization of Lupus Anticoagulants.  Thromb Haemost. 1991;  65 320-322
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 3 Brandt J T, Triplett D A, Alving B, Scharrer I. on behalf of the Subcommittee on Lupus Anticoagulant / Antiphospholipid Antibody of the Scientific and Standardisation Committee of the ISTH . Criteria for the diagnosis of lupus anticoagulants: an update.  Thromb Haemost. 1995;  74 1185-1190
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 4 Moffat K A, McKay H, Ledford-Kraemer M R et al.. Variability of clinical laboratory practices in testing for lupus anticoagulant and antiphospholipid antibodies: results of a NASCOLA survey.  [abstract 141] Lab Hematol. 2006;  12 170-171
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 5 http://Available at: www.wordnet.princeton.edu/perl/webwn?s=criterion Accessed August 21, 2007
  • 6 Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute .Procedures for the Collection of Diagnostic Blood Specimens by Venipuncture: Approved Standard-Sixth Edition. Wayne, PA; CLSI document H03–A6 2007
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 7 Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute .Procedures for the Handling and Processing of Blood Specimens: Approved Guideline. Third ed. Wayne, PA; Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute 2004 Document H18–A3
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 8 Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute .Collection, Transport, and Processing of Blood Specimens for Testing Plasma-Based Coagulation Assays and Molecular Hemostasis Assays: Approved Guideline. 5th ed. Wayne, PA; Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute 2008 Document H21–A5
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 9 Woodhams B, Girardot O, Blanco M-J, Colesse G, Gourmelin Y. Stability of coagulation proteins in frozen plasma.  Blood Coagul Fibrinolysis. 2001;  12 229-236
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 10 Chantarangkul V, Tripodi A, Clerici M, Bressi C, Mannucci P M. Laboratory diagnosis of lupus anticoagulants—effect of residual platelets in plasma, assessed by Staclot LA and silica clotting time.  Thromb Haemost. 2002;  87 854-858
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 11 Favaloro E J. Preanalytical variables in coagulation testing.  Blood Coagul Fibrinolysis. 2007;  18 86-89
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 12 Exner T, Low J. Detection of procoagulant phospholipid interfering in tests for lupus anticoagulant.  Thromb Res. 2004;  114 547-552
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 13 Narayanan S. Preanalytical aspects of coagulation testing.  Haematologica. 1995;  80(Suppl 2) 1-6
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 14 van den Besselaar A M, Meeuwisse-Braun J. Enzymatic elimination of heparin from plasma for activated partial thromboplastin time and prothrombin time testing.  Blood Coagul Fibrinolysis. 1993;  4 635-638
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 15 Jacobsen E M, Trettenes E J, Wisloff F, Abildgaard U. Detection and quantification of lupus anticoagulants in plasma from heparin treated patients, using addition of polybrene.  http://Available at: www.thrombosisjournal.com/content/4/1/3 Accessed October 22, 2007; 
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 16 Gosselin R C, Dager W E, King J H et al.. Effect of direct thrombin inhibitors, bivalirudin, lepirudin, and argatroban, on prothrombin time and INR values.  Am J Clin Pathol. 2004;  121 593-599
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 17 Warkentin T E. Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia: pathogenesis and management.  Br J Haematol. 2003;  121 535-555
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 18 Smogorzewska A, Brandt J T, Chandler W L et al.. Effect of fondaparinux on coagulation assays: results of College of American Pathologists proficiency testing.  Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2006;  130 1605-1611
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 19 Gosselin R C, King J H, Janatpur K A, Dager W H, Larkin E C, Owings J T. Effects of pentasaccharide (fondaparinux) and direct thrombin inhibitors on coagulation testing.  Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2004;  128 1142-1145
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 20 Genzen J R, Miller J L. Presence of direct thrombin inhibitors can affect the results and interpretation of lupus anticoagulant testing.  Am J Clin Pathol. 2005;  124 586-593
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 21 Tripodi A, Chantarangkul V, Clerici M, Mannucci P M. Laboratory diagnosis of lupus anticoagulants for patients on oral anticoagulant treatment. Performance of dilute Russell viper venom test and silica clotting time in comparison with Staclot LA.  Thromb Haemost. 2002;  88 583-586
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 22 Rauch J, Tannenbaum M, Janoff A S. Distinguishing plasma lupus anticoagulants from anti-factor antibodies using hexagonal (II) phase phospholipids.  Thromb Haemost. 1989;  62 892-896
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 23 Triplett D A, Stocker K F, Unger G A, Barna L K. The textarin/ecarin ratio: a confirmatory test for lupus anticoagulants.  Thromb Haemost. 1993;  70 925-931
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 24 Greaves M, Cohen H, Machin S J, Mackie I. Guidelines on the investigation and management of the antiphospholipid syndrome.  Br J Haematol. 2000;  109 704-715
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 25 Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute .How to Define and Determine Reference Intervals in the Clinical Laboratory: Approved Guideline. Second ed. Wayne, PA; Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute 2000 Document C28–A2
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 26 Brandt J T, Triplett D A, Musgrave K, Orr C. The sensitivity of different coagulation reagents to the presence of lupus anticoagulants.  Arch Pathol Lab Med. 1987;  111 120-124
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 27 Denis-Magdelaine A, Flahault A, Verdy E. Sensitivity of sixteen APTT reagents for the presence of lupus anticoagulants.  Haemostasis. 1995;  25 98-105
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 28 Arnout J, Vanrusselt M, Huybrechts E, Vermylen J. Optimization of the dilute prothrombin time for the detection of the lupus anticoagulant by use of a recombinant tissue thromboplastin.  Br J Haematol. 1994;  87 94-99
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 29 Thiagarajan P, Pengo V, Shapiro S S. The use of the dilute Russell viper venom time for the diagnosis of lupus anticoagulants.  Blood. 1986;  68 869-874
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 30 Exner T, Rickard K A, Kronenberg H. A sensitive test demonstrating lupus anticoagulant and its behavioural patterns.  Br J Haematol. 1978;  40 143-151
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 31 Chantarangkul V, Tripodi A, Arbini A, Mannucci P M. Silica clotting time (SCT) as a screening and confirmatory test for detection of the lupus anticoagulants.  Thromb Res. 1992;  67 355-365
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 32 Kaczor D A, Bickford N N, Triplett D A. Evaluation of different mixing study reagents and dilution effect in lupus anticoagulant testing.  Am J Clin Pathol. 1991;  95 408-411
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 33 Thom J, Ivey L, Eikelboom J. Normal plasma mixing studies in the laboratory diagnosis of lupus anticoagulant.  J Thromb Haemost. 2003;  1 2689-2691
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 34 Villa P, Mira Y, Ferrando F, Vaya A, Aznar J. Detection of low levels of lupus anticoagulant antibodies.  Thromb Res. 2005;  116 447-449
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 35 Moore G W, Savidge G F. The dilution effect of equal volume mixing studies compromises confirmation of inhibition by lupus anticoagulants even when mixture specific reference ranges are applied.  Thromb Res. 2006;  118 523-528
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 36 Exner T. Conceptions and misconceptions in testing for lupus anticoagulants.  J Autoimmun. 2000;  15 179-183
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 37 Loeliger A. Prothrombin as a co-factor of the circulating anticoagulant in systemic lupus erythematosus.  Thromb Diath Haemorrh. 1959;  3 237-256
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 38 Lo S C, Oldmeadow M J, Howard M A, Firkin B G. Comparison of laboratory tests used for identification of the lupus anticoagulant.  Am J Hematol. 1989;  30 213-220
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 39 Eschwege V, Lutters B, Hugel B, Freyssinet J M, Robert A, de Groot P G. Importance of beta-2 glycoprotein I in the lupus anticoagulant cofactor effect; a case report.  J Thromb Haemost. 2003;  1(Suppl 1) , abstract 1526
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 40 Dlott J S, Taylor J M, Dixon J L, Willen D R, Triplett D A. The high frequency and specificity of the lupus cofactor effect in a dPT screen.  J Thromb Haemost. 2003;  1(Suppl 1) , abstract 1561
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 41 Rosner E, Pauzner R, Lusky A, Modan M, Many A. Detection and quantitative evaluation of lupus circulating anticoagulant activity.  Thromb Haemost. 1987;  57 144-147
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 42 Chang S H, Tillema V, Scherr D A. “Percent correction” formula for evaluation of mixing studies.  Am J Clin Pathol. 2002;  117 62-73
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 43 Brandt J T, Barna L K, Triplett D A. Laboratory identification of lupus anticoagulants: results of the Second International Workshop for Identification of Lupus Anticoagulants. On behalf of the Subcommittee on Lupus Anticoagulants/Antiphospholipid Antibodies of the ISTH.  Thromb Haemost. 1995;  74 1597-1603
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 44 Devreese K M. Interpretation of normal plasma mixing studies in the laboratory diagnosis of lupus anticoagulants.  Thromb Res. 2007;  119 369-376
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar

Marlies R Ledford-Kraemer

CLOT-ED, Inc., 130 North Rolling Hill Road

Islamorada, FL 33070

Email: marlies@CLOT-ED.com