Anatomic Imaging of Abdominal Perforator Flaps without Ionizing Radiation: Seeing Is Believing with Magnetic Resonance Imaging Angiography

ABSTRACT

The tremendous variability of the inferior epigastric arterial system makes accurate imaging of the vasculature of the anterior abdominal wall an essential component of optimal perforator selection. Preoperative imaging of the abdominal vasculature allows for preoperative perforator selection, resulting in improved operative efficiency and flap design. Abdominal wall perforators of 1-mm diameter can be reliably visualized without exposing patients to ionizing radiation or iodinated intravenous contrast through advances in magnetic resonance imaging angiography (MRA). In this study, MRA imaging was performed on 31 patients who underwent 50 abdominal flaps. For each flap, the location, relative to the umbilicus, of the three largest perforators on both the left and right sides of the abdomen was determined with MRA. Vessel diameter and anatomic course were also evaluated. Postoperatively, a survey was completed by the surgeon to assess the accuracy of the MRA with respect to the intraoperative findings. All perforators visualized on MRA were found at surgery (0% false-positive). In 2 of 50 flaps, the surgeon transferred a flap based upon a vessel not visualized on the MRA (4% false-negative). This article details our experience with MRA as a reliable preoperative imaging technique for abdominal perforator flap breast reconstruction.

KEYWORDS

Deep inferior epigastric artery perforator - superficial inferior epigastric artery - abdominal perforator flap - magnetic resonance imaging angiography - preoperative imaging

REFERENCES

• 1 Blondeel P N, Demuynck M, Mete D et al.. Sensory nerve repair in perforator flaps for autologous breast reconstruction: Sensational or senseless?.  Br J Plast Surg. 1999;  52 37-44
• 2 Moon H K, Taylor G I. The vascular anatomy of rectus abdominis musculocutaneous flaps based on the deep superior epigastric system.  Plast Reconstr Surg. 1988;  82 815-832
• 3 Rozen W M, Palmer K P, Suami H et al.. The DIEA branching pattern and its relationship to perforators: the importance of preoperative computed tomographic angiography for DIEA perforator flaps.  Plast Reconstr Surg. 2008;  121 367-373
• 4 Kikuchi N, Murakami G, Kashiwa H et al.. Morphometrical study of the arterial perforators of the deep inferior epigastric perforator flap.  Surg Radiol Anat. 2001;  23 375-381
• 5 Heitmann C, Felmerer G, Durmus C et al.. Anatomical features of perforator blood vessels in the deep inferior epigastric perforator flap.  Br J Plast Surg. 2000;  53 205-208
• 6 Vandevoort M, Vranckx J J, Fabre B et al.. Perforator topography of the deep inferior epigastric perforator flap in 100 cases of breast reconstruction.  Plast Reconstr Surg. 2002;  109 1912-1918
• 7 Allen R J, Treece P. Deep inferior epigastric perforator flap for breast reconstruction.  Ann Plast Surg. 1994;  32 32-38
• 8 Masia J, Clavero J A, Larranaga J R et al.. Multidetector-row computed tomography in the planning of abdominal perforator flaps.  J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2006;  59 594-599
• 9 Rozen W M, Phillips T J, Ashton M W, Stella D L, Gibson R N, Taylor G I. Preoperative imaging for DIEA perforator flaps: a comparative study of computed tomographic angiography and Doppler ultrasound.  Plast Reconstr Surg. 2008;  121 9-16
• 10 Rozen W M, Ashton M W, Stella D L et al.. The accuracy of computed tomographic angiography for mapping the perforators of the DIEA: a cadaveric study.  Plast Reconstr Surg. 2008;  122 363-369
• 11 Brenner D J, Hall E J. Computed tomography-an increasing source of radiation exposure.  N Engl J Med. 2007;  357 2277-2284
• 12 Stein R. Too much of a good thing? The growing use of CT scans fuel medical concerns regarding radiation exposure. Washington Post; 2008 Jan 15 F1
• 13 Katayama H, Yamaguchi K, Kozuka T et al.. Adverse reactions to ionic and nonionic contrast media. A report from the Japanese Committee on the Safety of Contrast Media.  Radiology. 1990;  175 621-628
• 14 Parfrey P. The clinical epidemiology of contrast-induced nephropathy.  Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2005;  (28 suppl 2) S3-S11
• 15 Safety in medical imaging. American College Radiology Radiological Society North America, Inc. http://Available at www.radiologyinfo.org/en/safety/index.cfm?pg=sfty_xray&bhcp=1 Accessed September 1, 2008
• 16 Varnholt H. Computed tomography and radiation exposure.  N Engl J Med. 2008;  358 852-853
• 17 Shellock F G, Crues J V. MR procedures: biologic effects, safety, and patient care.  Radiology. 2004;  232 635-652
• 18 Dillman J R, Ellis J H, Cohan R H, Strouse P J, Jan S C. Frequency and severity of acute allergic-like reactions to gadolinium-containing IV contrast media in children and adults.  AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2007;  189 1533-1538
• 19 Niendorf H P, Alhassan A, Geens V R, Claub W. Safety review of gadopentetate dimeglumine extended clinical experience after more than five million applications.  Invest Radiol. 1994;  29(suppl 2) S179-S182
• 20 De Frene B, Van Landuyt K, Hamdi M et al.. Free DIEAP and SGAP flap breast reconstruction after abdominal/gluteal liposuction.  J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2006;  59 1031-1036
• 21 Gill P S, Hunt J P, Guerra A B et al.. A 10-year retrospective review of 758 DIEP flaps for breast reconstruction.  Plast Reconstr Surg. 2004;  113 1153-1160
• 22 Cowper S E. Nephrogenic fibrosing dermopathy [NFD/NSF Website]. 2001–2007. Available at http://www.icnfdr.org Accessed August 7, 2008
• 23 Scheinfeld N S, Cowper S E. Nephrogenic fibrosing dermopathy. 2008 Jan 25. Available at http://www.emedicine.com/derm/topic934.htm Accessed August 7, 2008
• 24 Rozen W M, Ashton M W, Stella D L, Phillips T J, Grinsell D, Taylor G I. The accuracy of computed tomographic angiography for mapping the perforators of the deep inferior epigastric artery: a blinded, prospective cohort study.  Plast Reconstr Surg. 2008;  122 1003-1009