Kinematical Profiling of the Front Crawl Start

Abstract

This study analysed the start phases of 15 elite front crawl swimmers, all specialists of sprint events. The first aim was to determine which phases were correlated with the 15-m start time. The features common to the sample of swimmers were then established and individual profiles were clustered. The subjects performed two 25-m trials at the 50-m race-pace using their preferential start technique (grab start). The kinematical analysis assessed the durations of the block, flight, entry, glide, leg kicking and full swimming phases to the 15-m mark. Stroking parameters and the index of arm coordination (IdC) were analysed for the swimming part (10–20 m) of the 25-m. Through the swimming part IdC increased while stroke length and velocity decreased (p<0.05). The relative durations of the aerial (block, flight), entry and underwater phases were correlated with start time. Inter-subject variability was observed, which suggests that various motor solutions were used for the start. Notably, four clusters led to a short 15-m start time: the leg kicking style, mixed “leg kicking/swimming” style, long glide style and short glide style.

Key words

biomechanics - swimming start - cluster analysis - coordination

References

• 1 Arellano R, Moreno FJ, Martinez M, Ona A. A device for quantitative measurement of starting time in swimming. In: Troup JP, Hollander AP, Strass D, Trappe SW, Cappaert JM, Trappe TA, eds. Swimming Science VII, London, E and FN SPON 1996: 195-200
• 2 Ayalon A, Gheluwe B, Kanitz M. A comparison of four styles of racing in swimming. In: Clarys JP, Lewillie L, eds. Swimming Science II, Baltimore: University Park Press 1975: 233-240
• 3 Benjanuvatra N, Lyttle A, Blanksby B, Larkin D. Force development profile of the lower limbs in the grab and track start in swimming. XXII International Symposium on Biomechanics in Sports 2004, Ottawa, Canada, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Ottawa 2004: 399-402
• 4 Bloom J, Hosler W, Disch J. Differences in flight, reaction and movement time for the grab and conventional starts.  Swim Tech. 1978;  15 34-36
• 5 Breed RVP, Young WB. The effect of a resistance training program on the grab, track and swing starts in swimming.  J Sports Sci. 2003;  21 213-220
• 6 Chollet D, Chalies S, Chatard JC. A new index of coordination for the crawl: description and usefulness.  Int J Sports Med. 2000;  21 54-59
• 7 Clothier P, McElroy G, Blanksby B, Payne W. Traditional and modified exits following freestyle tumble turns by skilled swimmers.  S Afr J Res Sport Phy Educ Rec. 2000;  22 41-55
• 8 Cossor JM, Mason BR. Swim start performances at the Sydney 2000 Olympic Games. In Blackwell JR, Sanders RH, eds. XIX International Symposium on Biomechanics in Sports, San Francisco, ISBS 2001: 70-73
• 9 Costill DL, Maglischo EW, Richardson AB. Handbook of Sports Medicine and Science. Swimming. Oxford, Blackwell Scientific Publications 1992
• 10 Davids K, Glazier P, Araujo D, Bartlett R. Movement systems as dynamical systems: The functional role of variability and its implications for sports medicine.  Sports Med. 2003;  33 245-260
• 11 De la Fuente B, Garcia F, Arellano R. Are the forces applied in the vertical countermovement jump related to the forces applied during the swimming start. In Chatard JC, ed. Biomechanics and Medicine in Swimming IX. Saint Etienne: University of Saint Etienne 2003: 207-210
• 12 Elipot M, Hellard P, Boissiere E, Rey JL, Lecat S, Taiar R, Houel N. Evaluation of the lose of speed at the water entry during a grab start for elite swimmers.  4th International Days of Sport Sciences. 2006;  87-88
• 13 Guimarães AC, Hay JG. A mechanical analysis of the grab starting technique in swimming.  Int J Sport Biomech. 1985;  1 25-35
• 14 Haljand R. http://www.swim.ee/competition/2006_helsinki/helsinki2006.htm 2006; 
• 15 Hubert M, Silveira GA, Freitas E, Pereira S, Roesler H. Speed variation analysis before and after the beginning of the stroke in swimming starts.  Port J Sport Sci. 2006;  6 ((Suppl 2)) 44-45
• 16 Issurin V, Verbitsky O. Track start versus grab start: Evidence from the Sydney Olympic Games. In Chatard JC, ed. Biomechanics and Medicine in Swimming IX. Saint Etienne: University of Saint Etienne 2003: 213-217
• 17 Lee CW, Huang C, Wang LI, Lin DC. Comparison of the dynamics of the swimming grab start, squat jump, and countermovement jump of the lower extremity. In: Blackwell JR, Sanders RH, eds. XIX International Symposium on Biomechanics in Sports. San Francisco: ISBS 2001: 143-146
• 18 Lyttle AD, Benjanuvatra N. Start right?.  A biomechanical review of dive start performance. 2005;  Available:  http://coachesinfo.com/category/swimming/321/
• 19 Lyttle A, Blanksby B, Elliott B, Lloyd D. Net forces during tethered simulation of underwater streamlined gliding and kicking techniques of the freestyle turn.  J Sports Sci. 2000;  18 801-807
• 20 Lyttle A, Blanksby B, Elliott B, Lloyd D. A comparison of underwater gliding and kicking techniques. In Sanders RH, Gibson BJ, eds. Scientific Proceedings of the XVII International Symposium on Biomechanics in Sports. Perth: W. Australia 1999: 81-84
• 21 Lyttle A, Blanksby B, Elliott B, Lloyd D. Optimal depth for streamlined gliding. In: Keskinen KL, Komi PV, Hollander AP, eds. Swimming Science VIII, Jyvaskyla. Finland: University of Jyvaskyla 1999: 165-170
• 22 Maiello D, Sabatini A, Demarie S, Sardella F, Dal Monte A. Passive drag on and under the water surface.  J Sports Sci. 1998;  16 420-421
• 23 Mason BR, Cossor JM. What can we learn from competition analysis at the 1999 Pan Pacific swimming championships?. In Sanders RH, Hong Y, eds. XVIII International Symposium on Biomechanics in Sports: Swimming. Hong-Kong: Chinese University Press 2000: 75-82
• 24 Mills BD, Gehlsen G. A multidisciplinary investigation of the relation of state sport confidence with preference and velocity of swimming starts.  Percept Mot Skills. 1996;  83 207-210
• 25 Pereira S, Ruschel C, Araújo L. Biomechanical analysis of the underwater phase in swimming start. In: Vilas-Boas JP, Alves F, Marques A, eds. Biomechanics and Medicine in Swimming X. Porto: Port J Sport Sci 2006 6: 79-81
• 26 Ruschel C, Araujo L, Pereira S, Roesler H. Kinematical analysis of the swimming start: Block, flight and underwater phases. In: XXV International Symposium on Biomechanics in Sports Ouro Preto, Brazil: ISBS 2007: 385-388
• 27 Sanders RH. Start technique – recent findings. Available:  http://www.education.ed.ac.uk/cis/swim/papers4/rs5.html
• 28 Sanders RH, Byatt-Smith J. Improving feedback on swimming turns and starts exponentially. Proceedings of XIX Symposium on Biomechanics in Sports, San Francisco 2001: 91-94
• 29 Seifert L, Boulesteix L, Carter M, Chollet D. The spatial-temporal and coordinative structures in elite male 100-m front crawl swimmers.  Int J Sports Med. 2004;  25 1-8
• 30 Seifert L, Chollet D, Chatard JC. Kinematic changes during a 100-m front crawl: Effects of performance level and gender.  Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2007;  39 1784-1793
• 31 Thayer AL, Hay JG. Motivating start and turn improvement.  Swim Tech. 1984;  2 17-20
• 32 Vilas-Boas JP, Cruz MJ, Sousa F, Conceiçao F, Fernandes R, Carvalho J. Biomechanical analysis of ventral swimming starts: Comparison of the grab start with two track start techniques. In: Chatard JC, ed. Biomechanics and Medicine in Swimming IX. Saint Etienne: University of Saint Etienne 2003: 249-225
• 33 Wilson DS, Marino GW. Kinematic analysis of 3 starts.  Swim Tech. 1983;  19 35-38
• 34 Zatsiorsky VM, Bulgakova NZ, Chaplinsky NM. Biomechanical analysis of starting techniques in swimming. In Terauds J, Bedingfield EW, eds. Swimming Science III. Baltimore: University Park Press 1979: 199-206

Correspondence