Download PDF
Endoscopy 2010; 42(6): 456-461
DOI: 10.1055/s-0029-1244022
Original article

© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Accuracy of endoscopic ultrasound in preoperative staging of esophageal cancer: results from a referral center for early esophageal cancer

O.  Pech1 , E.  Günter1 , F.  Dusemund1 , J.  Origer2 , D.  Lorenz2 , C.  Ell1
  • 1Department of Internal Medicine, HSK Wiesbaden, Wiesbaden, Germany
  • 2Department of General and Visceral Surgery, HSK Wiesbaden, Wiesbaden, Germany
Further Information

Publication History

submitted 4 May 2009

accepted after revision 13 January 2010

Publication Date:
19 March 2010 (online)

Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints

See also:

Commentaire de travail de O. Pech et al., pp. 456Endoscopy 2010; 42(06): 522-522
DOI: 10.1055/s-0031-1291863

Background and study aim: Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) has been regarded as the most accurate staging tool in esophageal cancer. Staging results have a strong impact on the decision as to whether a patient should undergo endoscopic treatment, surgery alone, or neoadjuvant therapy. This retrospective study was conducted to analyze the accuracy of esophageal cancer staging using EUS.

Methods: All patients who received EUS for staging of esophageal cancer before esophagectomy from February 2003 to December 2007 at a high volume academic tertiary care center were included.

Results: 179 consecutive patients (mean age 64.4 ± 9.5 years; 142 men) underwent esophageal resection for Barrett’s adenocarcinoma (n = 134) and squamous cell cancer (n = 45). Postoperatively, 99 patients were staged as having T1 cancers (55 %), 30 patients T2 (17 %), 46 patients T3 (26 %), and four patients T4 (2 %). The sensitivity and specificity of EUS relative to the T stage were 82 % and 91 %, respectively, for T1; 43 % and 85 % for T2; and 83 % and 86 % for T3. The overall accuracy for EUS in identifying the correct T stage was 74 % (95 %CI 66 – 80). Positive lymph nodes were diagnosed histologically in 68 patients (38 %). The sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of EUS for the diagnosis of N1 were 71 %, 74 % and 73 % (95 %CI 65 – 79), respectively.

Conclusions: The diagnostic accuracy of EUS in patients with esophageal cancer is still unsatisfactory. T2 cancers in particular are frequently overstaged, with a significant effect on the subsequent treatment strategy.

References

  • 1 Prasad G A, Wang K K, Buttar N S. et al . Long-term survival following endoscopic and surgical treatment of high-grade dysplasia in Barrett’s esophagus.  Gastroenterology. 2007;  132 1226-1233
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 2 Ell C, May A, Pech O. et al . Curative endoscopic resection of early esophageal adenocarcinomas (Barrett’s cancer).  Gastrointest Endosc. 2007;  65 3-10
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 3 Pech O, Behrens A, May A. et al . Long-term results and risk factor analysis for recurrence after curative endoscopic therapy in 349 patients with high-grade intraepithelial neoplasia and mucosal adenocarcinoma in Barrett’s oesophagus.  Gut. 2008;  57 1200-1206
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 4 Gebski V, Burmeister B, Smithers B M. et al . Survival benefits from neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy or chemotherapy in oesophageal carcinoma: a meta-analysis.  Lancet Oncol. 2007;  8 226-234
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 5 Cunningham D, Allum W H, Stenning S P. et al . Perioperative chemotherapy versus surgery alone for resectable gastroesophageal cancer.  . 2006;  355 11-20
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 6 van Vliet E P, Heijenbrok-Kal M H, Hunink M G. et al . Staging investigations for oesophageal cancer: a meta-analysis.  Br J Cancer. 2008;  98 547-557
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 7 Pech O, May A, Günter E. et al . The impact of endoscopic ultrasound and computed tomography on the TNM staging of early cancer in Barrett’s esophagus.  Am J Gastroenterol. 2006;  101 2223-2229
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 8 Bergman J J. The endoscopic diagnosis and staging of oesophageal adenocarcinoma.  Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol. 2006;  20 843-866
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 9 Zuccaro Jr G, Rice T W, Vargo J J. et al . Endoscopic ultrasound errors in esophageal cancer.  Am J Gastroenterol. 2005;  100 601-606
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 10 Kutup A, Link B C, Schurr P G. et al . Quality control of endoscopic ultrasound in preoperative staging of esophageal cancer.  Endoscopy. 2007;  39 715-719
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 11 Shimpi R A, George J, Jowell P, Gress F G. Staging of esophageal cancer by EUS: staging accuracy revisited.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2007;  66 475-482
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 12 Kelly S, Berry E, Roderick P. et al . The identification of bias in studies of the diagnostic performance of imaging modalities.  Br J Radiol. 1997;  70 1028-1035
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 13 Puli S R, Reddy J B, Bechtold M L. et al . Staging accuracy of esophageal cancer by endoscopic ultrasound: a meta-analysis and systematic review.  World J Gastroenterol. 2008;  14 1479-1490
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 14 Rösch T, Lorenz R, Zenker K. et al . Local staging and assessment of resectability in carcinoma of the esophagus, stomach, and duodenum by endoscopic ultrasonography.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1992;  38 460-467
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 15 Hölscher A H, Dittler H J, Siewert J R. Staging of squamous esophageal cancer: accuracy and value.  World J Surg. 1994;  18 312-320
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 16 Hofstetter W, Correa A M, Bekele N. et al . Proposed modification of nodal status in AJCC esophageal cancer staging system.  Ann Thorac Surg. 2007;  84 365-373
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 17 Chen J, Xu R, Hunt G C. et al . Influence of the number of malignant regional lymph nodes detected by endoscopic ultrasonography on survival stratification in esophageal adenocarcinoma.  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2006;  4 573-579
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 18 Eloubeidi M A, Wallace M B, Reed C E. et al . The utility of EUS and EUS-guided fine needle aspiration in detecting celiac lymph node metastasis in patients with esophageal cancer: a single-center experience.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2001;  54 714-719
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 19 Eloubeidi M A, Vilmann P, Wiersema M J. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration of celiac lymph nodes.  Endoscopy. 2004;  36 901-908
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 20 Vazquez-Sequeiros E, Norton I D, Clain J E. et al . Impact of EUS-guided fine-needle aspiration on lymph node staging in patients with esophageal carcinoma.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2001;  53 751-757
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 21 Dietrich C F, Ignee A, Frey H. Contrast-enhanced endoscopic ultrasound with low mechanical index: a new technique.  Z Gastroenterol. 2005;  43 1219-1223
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 22 Janssen J, Dietrich C F, Will U, Greiner L. Endosonographic elastography in the diagnosis of mediastinal lymph nodes.  Endoscopy. 2007;  39 952-957
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 23 Kanamori A, Hirooka Y, Itoh A. et al . Usefulness of contrast-enhanced endoscopic ultrasonography in the differentiation between malignant and benign lymphadenopathy.  Am J Gastroenterol. 2006;  101 45-51
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 24 Pech O, May A, Rabenstein T, Ell C. Endoscopic resection of early oesophageal cancer.  Gut. 2007;  56 1625-1634
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 25 Meining A, Rösch T, Wolf A. et al . High interobserver variability in endosonographic staging of upper gastrointestinal cancers.  Z Gastroenterol. 2003;  41 391-394
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSearch in Google Scholar

O. PechMD, PhD 

Department of Internal Medicine 2
HSK Wiesbaden

Ludwig-Erhard-Strasse 100
65199 Wiesbaden, Germany

Fax: +49-(0)611-432418

Email: oliver.pech@t-online.de