Skull Base 2010; 20(5): 343-347
DOI: 10.1055/s-0030-1253582
ORIGINAL ARTICLE

© Thieme Medical Publishers

Middle Turbinate Preservation in Endoscopic Transsphenoidal Surgery of the Anterior Skull Base

Gurston G. Nyquist1 , Vijay K. Anand1 , Seth Brown1 , Ameet Singh1 , Abtin Tabaee1 , Theodore H. Schwartz1 , 2
  • 1Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York Presbyterian Hospital, New York, New York
  • 2Department of Neurological Surgery, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York Presbyterian Hospital, New York, New York
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
10 May 2010 (online)

ABSTRACT

Endoscopic endonasal skull base surgery is a growing field in which the nasal corridors are used to address skull base lesions. Whether the middle turbinates must be removed for adequate exposure is controversial and not well addressed in the literature. This is a prospective, observational study of 163 consecutive cases of purely endoscopic endonasal transsphenoidal surgeries performed at a single tertiary care institution. The primary study outcome measurement is the feasibility of middle turbinate preservation in endoscopic transsphenoidal skull base surgery. The pathologies included 99 pituitary tumors, 15 craniopharyngiomas, 11 meningiomas, 11 Rathke's cleft cysts, 7 encephaloceles, 5 cerebrospinal fluid leak repairs, 9 clival chordomas, and 6 other pathologies of the sella. In patients undergoing surgery for a neoplasm, the average tumor size was 2.3 cm. The middle turbinate was preserved in 160/163 cases (98%). One hundred and twenty magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) studies were reviewed at a median of 16 months postoperatively and no patients (0%) developed frontal sinusitis. The middle turbinate can be preserved in nearly every endonasal, endoscopic transsphenoidal skull base case while still providing good exposure for successful tumor resection and skull base reconstruction. Postoperative sinonasal function may be better preserved with this technique.

REFERENCES

  • 1 Frank G, Pasquini E, Farneti G et al.. The endoscopic versus the traditional approach in pituitary surgery.  Neuroendocrinology. 2006;  83(3–4) 240-248
  • 2 Tabaee A, Anand V K, Barrón Y et al.. Endoscopic pituitary surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.  J Neurosurg. 2009;  111(3) 545-554
  • 3 Schwartz T H, Fraser J F, Brown S, Tabaee A, Kacker A, Anand V K. Endoscopic cranial base surgery: classification of operative approaches.  Neurosurgery. 2008;  62(5) 991-1002 discussion 1002-1005
  • 4 Leopold D A, Hummel T, Schwob J E, Hong S C, Knecht M, Kobal G. Anterior distribution of human olfactory epithelium.  Laryngoscope. 2000;  110(3 Pt 1) 417-421
  • 5 Kennedy D W. Middle turbinate resection: evaluating the issues—should we resect normal middle turbinates?.  Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1998;  124(1) 107
  • 6 Rice D H, Kern E B, Marple B F, Mabry R L, Friedman W H. The turbinates in nasal and sinus surgery: a consensus statement.  Ear Nose Throat J. 2003;  82(2) 82-84
  • 7 Cappabianca P, Cavallo L M, de Divitiis O, Solari D, Esposito F, Colao A. Endoscopic pituitary surgery.  Pituitary. 2008;  11(4) 385-390
  • 8 Kassam A, Snyderman C H, Mintz A et al.. Expanded endonasal approach: the rostrocaudal axis. Part I. Crista galli to sella turcica.  Neurosurg Focus. 2005;  19(1) 1-12
  • 9 de Divitiis E, Cavallo L M, Cappabianca P, Esposito F. Extended endoscopic endonasal transsphenoidal approach for the removal of suprasellar tumors: part 2.  Neurosurgery. 2007;  60(1) 46-58 discussion 58-59
  • 10 Frank G, Pasquini E, Doglietto F et al.. The endoscopic extended transsphenoidal approach for craniopharyngiomas.  Operative Neurosurgery. 2006;  59(1 Suppl) S75-S83
  • 11 Cappabianca P, Cavallo L M, Colao A et al.. Endoscopic endonasal transsphenoidal approach: outcome analysis of 100 consecutive procedures.  Minim Invasive Neurosurg. 2002;  45(4) 193-200
  • 12 Leng L Z, Brown S, Anand V K, Schwartz T H. “Gasket-seal” watertight closure in minimal-access endoscopic cranial base surgery.  Neurosurgery. 2008;  62(5, Suppl 2) E342-E343 discussion E343
  • 13 Tabaee A, Anand V K, Brown S M, Lin J W, Schwartz T H. Algorithm for reconstruction after endoscopic pituitary and skull base surgery.  Laryngoscope. 2007;  117(7) 1133-1137
  • 14 Lawson W. The intranasal ethmoidectomy: an experience with 1,077 procedures.  Laryngoscope. 1991;  101(4 Pt 1) 367-371
  • 15 Morgenstein K M, Krieger M K. Experiences in middle turbinectomy.  Laryngoscope. 1980;  90(10 Pt 1) 1596-1603
  • 16 Swanson P B, Lanza D C, Vining E M et al.. The effect of middle turbinate resection upon the frontal sinus.  Am J Rhinol. 1995;  9 191-195
  • 17 Biedlingmaier J F, Whelan P, Zoarski G, Rothman M. Histopathology and CT analysis of partially resected middle turbinates.  Laryngoscope. 1996;  106(1 Pt 1) 102-104
  • 18 Gaskins Jr R E. Scarring in endoscopic ethmoidectomy.  Am J Rhinol. 1994;  8 271-274
  • 19 Houser S M. Surgical treatment for empty nose syndrome.  Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2007;  133(9) 858-863
  • 20 Fortune D S, Duncavage J A. Incidence of frontal sinusitis following partial middle turbinectomy.  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 1998;  107(6) 447-453
  • 21 Havas T E, Lowinger D S. Comparison of functional endonasal sinus surgery with and without partial middle turbinate resection.  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2000;  109(7) 634-640
  • 22 Saidi I S, Biedlingmaier J F, Rothman M I. Pre- and postoperative imaging analysis for frontal sinus disease following conservative partial middle turbinate resection.  Ear Nose Throat J. 1998;  77(4) 326-328, 330, 332 passim
  • 23 Kuhn F A, Javer A R, Nagpal K, Citardi M J. The frontal sinus rescue procedure: early experience and three-year follow-up.  Am J Rhinol. 2000;  14(4) 211-216

Gurston G NyquistM.D. 

772 Park Avenue

New York, New York, 10021

Email: ggnyquist@hotmail.com