More Consistent Postoperative Care and Monitoring can Reduce Costs Following Microvascular Free Flap Reconstruction

ABSTRACT

Great variability exists in microsurgical postoperative care in the United States. Lack of standardized postoperative monitoring protocols and appropriate training of monitoring personnel leads to inefficiency and increased cost of providing microsurgical postoperative care. A 45-question survey was sent to all plastic surgery and plastic surgery–based microsurgery program directors in the United States. Questions focused on the number and type of flaps performed, length of stay, complications, postoperative monitoring setting, training provided to monitoring personnel, and limitations in flap monitoring. The response rate was 31% with 3407 microvascular free flaps performed annually at 26 centers. A total of 1533 flaps were monitored in the intensive care unit (ICU) for an average of 3.1 days. In 45% of responding centers patients were cared for in an ICU secondary to a lack of adequately trained nurses at alternative sites. Printed postoperative protocols were provided to nurses in 39% of centers. With a comparative increase cost of $2878 to $3345 per day for ICU care, this translates into an annual increased cost of $13.7 to $15.9 million to the responding centers. Improved nursing training and the use of standardized postoperative protocols may allow patients to be monitored in non-ICU settings postoperatively, thereby reducing the costs associated with providing postoperative microsurgical care.

KEYWORDS

Microsurgery - cost - survey

REFERENCES

• 1 Khouri R K. Avoiding free flap failure.  Clin Plast Surg. 1992;  19(4) 773-781
• 2 Xipoleas G, Levine E, Silver L, Koch R M, Taub P J. A survey of microvascular protocols for lower extremity free tissue transfer II: postoperative care.  Ann Plast Surg. 2008;  61(3) 280-284
• 3 Rohde C, Howell B W, Buncke G M et al.. A recommended protocol for the immediate postoperative care of lower extremity free-flap reconstructions.  J Reconstr Microsurg. 2009;  25(1) 15-19
• 4 Xipoleas G, Levine E, Silver L, Koch R M, Taub P J. A survey of microvascular protocols for lower-extremity free tissue transfer I: perioperative anticoagulation.  Ann Plast Surg. 2007;  59(3) 311-315
• 5 Khouri R K, Cooley B C, Kunselman A R et al.. A prospective study of microvascular free-flap surgery and outcome.  Plast Reconstr Surg. 1998;  102(3) 711-721
• 6 Neligan P C. Monitoring techniques for the detection of flow failure in the postoperative period.  Microsurgery. 1993;  14(3) 162-164
• 7 Spiegel J H, Polat J K. Microvascular flap reconstruction by otolaryngologists: prevalence, postoperative care, and monitoring techniques.  Laryngoscope. 2007;  117(3) 485-490
• 8 Jallali N, Ridha H, Butler P E. Postoperative monitoring of free flaps in UK plastic surgery units.  Microsurgery. 2005;  25(6) 469-472
• 9 Keller A. A new diagnostic algorithm for early prediction of vascular compromise in 208 microsurgical flaps using tissue oxygen saturation measurements.  Ann Plast Surg. 2009;  62(5) 538-543
• 10 Wolff K D, Hölzle F, Wysluch A, Mücke T, Kesting M. Incidence and time of intraoperative vascular complications in head and neck microsurgery.  Microsurgery. 2008;  28(3) 143-146
• 11 Rapoport J, Teres D, Zhao Y, Lemeshow S. Length of stay data as a guide to hospital economic performance for ICU patients.  Med Care. 2003;  41(3) 386-397
• 12 United States Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics .Consumer Price Index Inflation Calculator. Vol. 2009 2009
• 13 Holcomb B W, Wheeler A P, Ely E W. New ways to reduce unnecessary variation and improve outcomes in the intensive care unit.  Curr Opin Crit Care. 2001;  7(4) 304-311
• 14 Peters C L, Shirley B, Erickson J. The effect of a new multimodal perioperative anesthetic regimen on postoperative pain, side effects, rehabilitation, and length of hospital stay after total joint arthroplasty.  J Arthroplasty. 2006;  21(6, Suppl 2) 132-138
• 15 Licker M, Khatchatourian G, Schweizer A, Bednarkiewicz M, Tassaux D, Chevalley C. The impact of a cardioprotective protocol on the incidence of cardiac complications after aortic abdominal surgery.  Anesth Analg. 2002;  95(6) 1525-1533 , (Abstract)

0 Both authors contributed equally to this paper