Subscribe to RSS
DOI: 10.1055/s-0030-1256125
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York
Long-term randomized controlled trial of a novel nanopowder hemostatic agent (TC-325) for control of severe arterial upper gastrointestinal bleeding in a porcine model
Publication History
submitted 21 August 2010
accepted after revision 3 November 2010
Publication Date:
07 March 2011 (online)
Background and study aim: Endoscopic therapy of brisk upper gastrointestinal bleeding remains challenging. A proprietary nanopowder (TC-325) has been proven to be effective in high pressure bleeding from external wounds. The efficacy and safety of TC-325 were assessed in a survival gastrointestinal bleeding animal model.
Method: 10 animals were randomized to treatment or sham. All animals received intravenous antibiotics, H2-blockers and heparin (activated clotting time 2 × normal). In a sterile laparotomy the gastroepiploic vessels were dissected, inserted through a 1-cm gastrotomy, and freely exposed in the gastric lumen, and the exposed vessel lacerated by needle knife. The treatment group received TC-325 by a modified delivery catheter while the sham group received no endoscopic treatment. Time to hemostasis, and mortality at 60 minutes, 24 hours, 48 hours, and 7 days were noted. Necropsy was performed in all animals.
Results: Spurting arterial bleeding was achieved in all animals. No control animal showed hemostasis within the first hour compared with 100 % (5 / 5) in the treatment arm (mean 13.8 minutes, P < 0.0079). Durable hemostasis was achieved with no evidence of rebleeding after 1 and 24 hours in 80 % (4 / 5) of the treated animals compared with none in the control group (P < 0.0098). None of the control animals survived more than 6 hours. Necropsy at 1 week in treated animals revealed healed gastrotomy without foreign body granuloma or embolization to the lung or brain.
Conclusion: TC-325 is safe and highly effective in achieving hemostasis in an anticoagulated severe arterial gastrointestinal bleeding animal model.
References
- 1 Palmer K. Acute upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage. Br Med Bull. 2007; 83 307-324
- 2 Fallah M A, Prakash C, Edmundowicz S. Acute gastrointestinal bleeding. Med Clin North Am. 2000; 84 1183-1208
- 3 Gupta P K, Fleischer D E. Nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding. Med Clin North Am. 1993; 77 973-992
- 4 Yavorski R T, Wong R K, Maydonovitch C et al. Analysis of 3,294 cases of upper gastrointestinal bleeding in military medical facilities. Am J Gastroenterol. 1995; 90 568-573
- 5 Alam H B, Burris D, DaCorta J A, Rhee P. Hemorrhage control in the battlefield: role of new hemostatic agents. Mil Med. 2005; 170 63-69
- 6 Carraway J W, Kent D, Young K et al. Comparison of a new mineral based hemostatic agent to a commercially available granular zeolite agent for hemostasis in a swine model of lethal extremity arterial hemorrhage. Resuscitation. 2008; 78 230-235. Epub 2008 May 15
- 7 Kheirabadi B S, Edens J W, Terrazas I B et al. Comparison of new hemostatic granules/powders with currently deployed hemostatic products in a lethal model of extremity arterial hemorrhage in swine. J Trauma. 2009; 66 316-326; discussion 327 – 328
- 8 Ward K R, Tiba M H, Holbert W H et al. Comparison of a new hemostatic agent to current combat hemostatic agents in a swine model of lethal extremity arterial hemorrhage. J Trauma. 2007; 63 276-283; discussion 283 – 284
- 9 Institute for Laboratory Animal Research, Commission on Life Sciences, National Research Council .Guide for the care and use of laboratory animals. 1966
- 10 Pfau P R, Cooper G S, Carlson M D et al. Success and shortcomings of a clinical care pathway in the management of acute nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding. Am J Gastroenterol. 2004; 99 425-431
- 11 Forrest J A, Finlayson N D, Shearman D J. Endoscopy in gastrointestinal bleeding. Lancet. 1974; 17 394-397
- 12 Chung S S, Lau J Y, Sung J J et al. Randomised comparison between adrenaline injection alone and adrenaline injection plus heat probe treatment for actively bleeding ulcers. BMJ. 1997; 314 1307-1311
- 13 Kumar P, Fleischer D E. Thermal therapy for gastrointestinal bleeding. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am. 1997; 7 593-609
- 14 Havanond C, Havanond P. Argon plasma coagulation therapy for acute non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005; Apr 18; 2 CD003791
- 15 Gevers A M, De Goede E, Simoens M et al. A randomized trial comparing injection therapy with hemoclip and with injection combined with hemoclip for bleeding ulcers. Gastrointest Endosc. 2002; 55 466-469
- 16 Laine L, McQuaid K R. Endoscopic therapy for bleeding ulcers: an evidence-based approach based on meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2009; 7 33-47; quiz 1 – 2. Epub 2008 Aug 16
- 17 Vergara M, Calvet X, Gisbert J P. Epinephrine injection versus epinephrine injection and a second endoscopic method in high risk bleeding ulcers. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007; Apr 18; 2 CD005584
- 18 Lin H J, Perng C L, Sun I C et al. Endoscopic haemoclip versus heater probe thermocoagulation plus hypertonic saline-epinephrine injection for peptic ulcer bleeding. Dig Liver Dis. 2003; 35 898-902
S. A. GidayMD
Johns Hopkins Hospital
Division of Gastroenterology
1830 East Monument Street, Room 424
Baltimore, MD 21205
USA
Fax: +1-410-614-2490
Email: sgiday1@jhmi.edu