Effect of Fear of Litigation on Obstetric Care: A Nationwide Analysis on Obstetric Practice

ABSTRACT

The aim of our study was to investigate the influence of malpractice premiums paid by obstetricians on obstetric care across the United States. We conducted a retrospective cross-sectional population-based study using patient-level data obtained from the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project–Nationwide Inpatient Sample on every woman who delivered in 2006. Mode of delivery was compared with the average state medical liability insurance premium paid by obstetricians (Medical Liability Monitor and the National Association of Insurance Commissioners) using a generalized estimating equation to calculate crude and adjusted odds ratios. Our cohort included 890,266 women who delivered across 37 states in 2006. Average state malpractice premium of over $100,000 was associated with higher incidences of total cesarean deliveries (odds ratio [OR] 1.17, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.02, 1.35); lower incidences of vaginal births after cesarean deliveries (OR 0.60, 95% CI: 0.37, 0.98); and lower rates of instrumental deliveries (OR 0.72, 95% CI: 0.63, 0.83) compared with when the average state malpractice premium was less than $50,000. Fear of litigation appears to have a marked effect on obstetric practice, particularly total cesarean delivery, vaginal birth after cesarean, and instrumental delivery, when malpractice premiums rise above $100,000 per annum.

KEYWORDS

Cesarean delivery - malpractice - quality care - litigation

REFERENCES

• 1 National Institutes of Health state-of-the-science conference statement: Cesarean delivery on maternal request March 27-29, 2006.  Obstet Gynecol. 2006;  107 1386-1397
• 2 Martin J A, Hamilton B E, Menacher F, Sutton P D, Mathews T J. Preliminary births for 2004, Infant and Maternal Health: Health E-stats. Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics; November 15, 2005
• 3 Minkoff H, Chervenak F A. Elective primary cesarean delivery.  N Engl J Med. 2003;  348 946-950
• 4 Scott J R. Cesarean delivery on request: where do we go from here?.  Obstet Gynecol. 2006;  107 1222-1223
• 5 Menacker F, Martin J A. BirthStats: rates of cesarean delivery, and unassisted and assisted vaginal delivery, United States, 1996, 2000, and 2006.  Birth. 2009;  36 167
• 6 Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Health Resources and Service Administration .Healthy People 2010: objectives for improving health. Maternal, Infant, and Child Indicators. [monograph on the Internet] Rockville, MD; US Department of Health and Human Services; 2000 [cited 2009 July 17] Available at: http://www.healthypeople.gov/Document/pdf/Volume2/16MICH.pdf Accessed July 17, 2009
• 7 Liu S, Liston R M, Joseph K S, Heaman M, Sauve R, Kramer M S. Maternal Health Study Group of the Canadian Perinatal Surveillance System . Maternal mortality and severe morbidity associated with low-risk planned cesarean delivery versus planned vaginal delivery at term.  CMAJ. 2007;  176 455-460
• 8 Ecker J L, Frigoletto Jr F D. Cesarean delivery and the risk-benefit calculus.  N Engl J Med. 2007;  356 885-888
• 9 Declercq E, Menacker F, Macdorman M F. Maternal risk profiles and the primary cesarean rate in the United States, 1991-2002.  Am J Public Health. 2006;  96 867-872
• 10 Mello M M, Studdert D M, Brennan T A. The new medical malpractice crisis.  N Engl J Med. 2003;  348 2281-2284
• 11 Localio A R, Lawthers A G, Bengtson J M et al.. Relationship between malpractice claims and cesarean delivery.  JAMA. 1993;  269 366-373
• 12 Yang Y T, Mello M M, Subramanian S V, Studdert D M. Relationship between malpractice litigation pressure and rates of cesarean section and vaginal birth after cesarean section.  Med Care. 2009;  47 234-242
• 13 Murthy K, Grobman W A, Lee T A, Holl J L. Association between rising professional liability insurance premiums and primary cesarean delivery rates.  Obstet Gynecol. 2007;  110 1264-1269
• 14 Benedetti T J, Baldwin L M, Skillman S M et al.. Professional liability issues and practice patterns of obstetric providers in Washington State.  Obstet Gynecol. 2006;  107 1238-1246
• 15 Rock S M. Malpractice premiums and primary cesarean section rates in New York and Illinois.  Public Health Rep. 1988;  103 459-463
• 16 Ryan K, Schnatz P, Greene J, Curry S. Change in cesarean section rate as a reflection of the present malpractice crisis.  Conn Med. 2005;  69 139-141
• 17 Dubay L, Kaestner R, Waidmann T. The impact of malpractice fears on cesarean section rates.  J Health Econ. 1999;  18 491-522
• 18 Medical Liability Monitor. Annual Rate Survey.  2006;  31 (10)
• 19 National Association of Insurance Commissioners .2006 Market Share Reports for Property/Casualty Insurance Groups and Companies. Kansas City, MO: National Association of Insurance Commissioners; 2006
• 20 MacDorman M F, Menacker F, Declercq E. Cesarean birth in the United States: epidemiology, trends, and outcomes.  Clin Perinatol. 2008;  35 293-307, v
• 21 Sloan F A, Entman S S, Reilly B A et al.. Tort liability and obstetricians' care level.  Int Rev Law Econ. 1997;  17 245-260
• 22 Ali U A, Norwitz E R. Vacuum-assisted vaginal delivery.  Rev Obstet Gynecol. 2009;  2 5-17
• 23 Majoko F, Gardener G. Trial of instrumental delivery in theatre versus immediate caesarean section for anticipated difficult assisted births.  Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008;  (4) CD005545
• 24 Gould J B, Davey B, Stafford R S. Socioeconomic differences in rates of cesarean section.  N Engl J Med. 1989;  321 233-239
• 25 Gordon D, Milberg J, Daling J, Hickok D. Advanced maternal age as a risk factor for cesarean delivery.  Obstet Gynecol. 1991;  77 493-497
• 26 GAO-03–702 Medical Malpractice Insurance: Multiple Factors Have Contributed to Increased Premium Rates General Accounting Office, June 2003. Available at: http://www.gao.gov/new.items/d03702.pdf Accessed July 19, 2009
• 27 Hueston W J, Lewis-Stevenson S. Provider distribution and variations in statewide cesarean section rates.  J Community Health. 2001;  26 1-10
• 28 Clark S L, Xu W, Porter T F, Love D. Institutional influences on the primary cesarean section rate in Utah, 1992 to 1995.  Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1998;  179 841-845
• 29 Smarr L E. Statement of the Physician Insurers Association of America before a joint hearing of the United States Senate Judiciary Committee and Health, Education, Labor and Pensions Committee. February 11, 2003
• 30 Danzon P M. The frequency and severity of medical malpractice claims: new evidence.  Law Contemp Probl. 1986;  49 57-84
• 31 Clark S L, Belfort M A, Hankins G DV, Meyers J A, Houser F M. Variation in the rates of operative delivery in the United States.  Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2007;  196 526-e1–e5