Arzneimittelforschung 2010; 60(8): 506-509
DOI: 10.1055/s-0031-1296319
Analgesics · Anti-inflammatories · Antiphlogistics · Antirheumatic Drugs
Editio Cantor Verlag Aulendorf (Germany)

Bioequivalence study of a fixed dose combination tablet containing rabeprazole and diclofenac sodium in healthy Indian subjects

Jayanti Mukherjee
1   Bioequivalence Study Centre, Department of Pharmaceutical Technology, Jadavpur University, Kolkata, India
,
Ayan Das
1   Bioequivalence Study Centre, Department of Pharmaceutical Technology, Jadavpur University, Kolkata, India
,
Uday S. Chakrabarty
1   Bioequivalence Study Centre, Department of Pharmaceutical Technology, Jadavpur University, Kolkata, India
,
Bijay Sahoo
1   Bioequivalence Study Centre, Department of Pharmaceutical Technology, Jadavpur University, Kolkata, India
,
Pinaki Sengupta
1   Bioequivalence Study Centre, Department of Pharmaceutical Technology, Jadavpur University, Kolkata, India
,
Bappaditya Chatterjee
1   Bioequivalence Study Centre, Department of Pharmaceutical Technology, Jadavpur University, Kolkata, India
,
Bikash Roy
1   Bioequivalence Study Centre, Department of Pharmaceutical Technology, Jadavpur University, Kolkata, India
,
Tapan K. Pal
1   Bioequivalence Study Centre, Department of Pharmaceutical Technology, Jadavpur University, Kolkata, India
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
03 December 2011 (online)

Abstract

The pharmacokinetics of rabeprazole (CAS 117976-89-3) and diclofenac sodium (CAS 15307-79-6) has been extensively evaluated in adult human volunteers individually after oral administration of tablet formulation. However, no published data is available regarding the combined pharmacokinetics and bioavailability of this particular fixed dose combination. In light of the above, a clinical study was designed to evaluate the bioequivalence of two fixed dose combination (FDC) products (reference and test) of two manufacturers containing rabeprazole 20 mg and diclofenac sodium 100 mg slow release (SR) tablet in healthy Indian male volunteers.

Each subject received a test FDC and a reference FDC in a randomized, single dose, fasting state, two period, and crossover study design with a one-week washout period between the doses. Extraction of the drugs from the plasma was carried out by the precipitation method. Analysis of rabeprazole and diclofenac sodium from plasma samples was done by a simple and sensitive HPLC method using a UV detector. An analysis of variance was performed on the pharmacokinetic parameters of Cmax, tmax, AUC0–t, and AUC0–∞ using general linear model (GLM) procedures in which sources of variation were subject, formulation and period.

The results of this study indicated that there were no statistically significant differences between the logarithmically transformed AUC0–∞ and Cmax values of the two preparations. The 90% confidence interval for the ratio of logarithmically transformed AUC0–t, AUC0–∞ and Cmax were within the bioequivalence limit of 0.80–1.25 and the relative bioavailability of rabeprazole and diclofenac sodium were found to be 98.6% and 98.9% respectively in the test product. Thus, these findings clearly indicated that the two products are bioequivalent in terms of rate and extent of drug absorption.

 
  • Reference

  • 1 Lohe RW, Suruse PB, Kale MK, Barethiya PR, Kasture AV, Lohe SW.. Spectrophotometric methods for simultaneous estimation of rabeprazole and diclofenac from combined tablet dosage form. Asian J Res Chem. 2008; 1 (1) 26-8
  • 2 Hinz B, Chevts J, Renner B, Wuttke H, Rau T, Schmidt A et al. Bioavailability of diclofenac potassium at low doses. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2004; 59 (1) 80-4
  • 3 Chow SC, Liu JP. Design and Analysis of Bioavailability and Bioequivalence Studies. 2nd ed. New York: Marcel Decker; 2000
  • 4 Abdou HM. Dissolution Bioavailability and Bioequivalence. 2nd ed. Easton: Mack; 1989
  • 5 Hauschke D, Steinijans VW, Diletti E.. A distribution free procedure for the statistical analysis of bioequivalence studies. Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther Toxicol. 1990; 28 (2) 72-8
  • 6 Sculz HU, Steinijans VW.. Striving for standards in bioequivalence assessment: a review. Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther Toxicol. 1992; 30: 51-6
  • 7 Farolfi M, Power JD, Rescigno A.. On the determination of bioequivalence. Pharmacol Res. 1999; 39 (1) 1-4
  • 8 Nation RL, Sansom LN.. Bioequivalence requirements for generic products. Pharmacol Ther. 1994; 62: 41-55
  • 9 Shah VP, Midha KK, Singh S.. Analytical method validation bioavailability, bioequivalence and pharmacokinetic studies. Eur J Drug Metab Pharmacokinet. 1992; 16: 249-55
  • 10 U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Guidance for Industry Bioavailability and Bioequivalence Studies for orally Administered Drug Products — General Considerations Rockville, MD: Centre for Drug Evaluation and Research; 2000.