Quadriceps Tendon Rupture: A Biomechanical Comparison of Transosseous Equivalent Double-Row Suture Anchor Versus Transosseous Tunnel Repair

Abstract

Quadriceps rupture off the patella is traditionally repaired by a transosseous tunnel technique, although a single-row suture anchor repair has recently been described. This study biomechanically tested a new transosseous equivalent (TE) double-row suture anchor technique compared with the transosseous repair for quadriceps repair. After simulated quadriceps-patella avulsion in 10 matched cadaveric knees, repairs were completed by either a three tunnel transosseous (TT = 5) or a TE suture anchor (TE = 5) technique. Double-row repairs were done using two 5.5 Bio-Corkscrew FT (fully threaded) (Arthrex, Inc., Naples, FL, USA) and two 3.5 Bio-PushLock anchors (Arthrex, Inc., Naples, FL, USA) with all 10 repairs done with #2 FiberWire suture (Arthrex, Inc., Naples, FL). Cyclic testing from 50 to 250 N for 250 cycles and pull to failure load (1 mm/s) were undertaken. Gap formation and ultimate tensile load (N) were recorded and stiffness data (N/mm) were calculated. Statistical analysis was performed using a Mann–Whitney U test and survival characteristics examined with Kaplan–Meier test. No significant difference was found between the TE and TT groups in stiffness (TE = 134 ± 15 N/mm, TT = 132 ± 26 N/mm, p = 0.28). The TE group had significantly less ultimate tensile load (N) compared with the TT group (TE = 447 ± 86 N, TT = 591 ± 8 4 N, p = 0.04), with all failures occurring at the suture eyelets. Although both quadriceps repairs were sufficiently strong, the transosseous repairs were stronger than the TE suture anchor repairs. The repair stiffness and gap formation were similar between the groups.

Keywords

quadriceps tendon repair - transosseous equivalent repair

• References

• 1 Richards DP, Barber FA. Repair of quadriceps tendon ruptures using suture anchors. Arthroscopy 2002; 18 (5) 556-559
• 2 Rougraff BT, Reeck CC, Essenmacher J. Complete quadriceps tendon ruptures. Orthopedics 1996; 19 (6) 509-514
• 3 Konrath GA, Chen D, Lock T , et al. Outcomes following repair of quadriceps tendon ruptures. J Orthop Trauma 1998; 12 (4) 273-279
• 4 Ilan DI, Tejwani N, Keschner M, Leibman M. Quadriceps tendon rupture. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2003; 11 (3) 192-200
• 5 Rasul Jr AT, Fischer DA. Primary repair of quadriceps tendon ruptures. Results of treatment. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1993; (289) 205-207
• 6 Kerin C, Hopgood P, Banks AJ. Delayed repair of the quadriceps using the Mitek anchor system: a case report and review of the literature. Knee 2006; 13 (2) 161-163
• 7 Bushnell BD, Whitener GB, Rubright JH, Creighton RA, Logel KJ, Wood ML. The use of suture anchors to repair the ruptured quadriceps tendon. J Orthop Trauma 2007; 21 (6) 407-413
• 8 Barber FA, Herbert MA, Richards DP. Sutures and suture anchors: update 2003. Arthroscopy 2003; 19 (9) 985-990
• 9 Lighthart WA, Cohen DA, Levine RG, Parks BG, Boucher HR. Suture anchor versus suture through tunnel fixation for quadriceps tendon rupture: a biomechanical study. Orthopedics 2008; 31 (5) 441-
• 10 Burkhart SS. The deadman theory of suture anchors: observations along a south Texas fence line. Arthroscopy 1995; 11 (1) 119-123
• 11 Bushnell BD, Byram IR, Weinhold PS, Creighton RA. The use of suture anchors in repair of the ruptured patellar tendon: a biomechanical study. Am J Sports Med 2006; 34 (9) 1492-1499
• 12 Kim DH, Elattrache NS, Tibone JE , et al. Biomechanical comparison of a single-row versus double-row suture anchor technique for rotator cuff repair. Am J Sports Med 2006; 34 (3) 407-414
• 13 Cole BJ, ElAttrache NS, Anbari A. Arthroscopic rotator cuff repairs: an anatomic and biomechanical rationale for different suture-anchor repair configurations. Arthroscopy 2007; 23 (6) 662-669