Subscribe to RSS
DOI: 10.1055/s-0031-1299660
Functional Outcomes Used to Compare Single Radius and Multiradius of Curvature Designs in Total Knee Arthroplasty
Publication History
27 April 2011
05 October 2011
Publication Date:
03 May 2012 (online)
Abstract
A recent development to better recreate joint kinematics has been a change from a multiradius (MR) design to a single radius (SR) design. We analyzed 559 primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) procedures which used either a SR (n = 426 Triathlon®; Stryker Orthopaedics, Mahwah, NJ) or MR of curvature knee system (n = 133 Duracon®; Stryker Orthopaedics, Mahwah, NJ) (79.3% follow-up; 705 total TKA procedures identified). Patients were administered a modification of the Knee Society score (KSS) (3.9 years average follow-up). The SR design showed improvements over the MR design in pain (p = 0.021), stability (p = 0.002), flexion (p = 0.006), ability to completely straighten the knee (p = 0.025), stair climbing (p = 0.0001), walking (p = 0.0001), use of assistive devices (p = 0.0005), postoperative knee score (p = 0.0005), and postoperative function (p < 0.0001). Analysis of the change in KSS knee (p = 0.002) and function scores (p = 0.002) from preoperative visit to postoperative follow-up favored the SR design as well. These data support the use of SR implants and provide evidence of improved outcomes in terms of function, stability, and pain.
-
References
- 1 Fries JF. Aging, natural death, and the compression of morbidity. N Engl J Med 1980; 303 (3) 130-135
- 2 Hollister AM, Jatana S, Singh AK, Sullivan WW, Lupichuk AG. The axes of rotation of the knee. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1993; (290) 259-268
- 3 Wang H, Simpson KJ, Ferrara MS, Chamnongkich S, Kinsey T, Mahoney OM. Biomechanical differences exhibited during sit-to-stand between total knee arthroplasty designs of varying radii. J Arthroplasty 2006; 21 (8) 1193-1199
- 4 Churchill DL, Incavo SJ, Johnson CC, Beynnon BD. The transepicondylar axis approximates the optimal flexion axis of the knee. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1998; (356) 111-118
- 5 Mahoney OM, McClung CD, dela Rosa MA, Schmalzried TP. The effect of total knee arthroplasty design on extensor mechanism function. J Arthroplasty 2002; 17 (4) 416-421
- 6 D’Lima DD, Poole C, Chadha H, Hermida JC, Mahar A, Colwell Jr CW. Quadriceps moment arm and quadriceps forces after total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2001; (392) 213-220
- 7 Browne C, Hermida JC, Bergula A, Colwell Jr CW, D’Lima DD. Patellofemoral forces after total knee arthroplasty: effect of extensor moment arm. Knee 2005; 12 (2) 81-88
- 8 Gómez-Barrena E, Fernandez-García C, Fernandez-Bravo A, Cutillas-Ruiz R, Bermejo-Fernandez G. Functional performance with a single-radius femoral design total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2010; 468 (5) 1214-1220
- 9 Hall J, Copp SN, Adelson WS, D’Lima DD, Colwell Jr CW. Extensor mechanism function in single-radius vs multiradius femoral components for total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2008; 23 (2) 216-219
- 10 Insall JN, Dorr LD, Scott RD, Scott WN. Rationale of the Knee Society clinical rating system. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1989; (248) 13-14
- 11 Worland RL, Johnson GV, Alemparte J, Jessup DE, Keenan J, Norambuena N. Ten to fourteen year survival and functional analysis of the AGC total knee replacement system. Knee 2002; 9 (2) 133-137
- 12 Harwin SF, Greene KA, Hitt K. Triathlon total knee arthroplasty: 4-year outcomes with a high-performance implant. J Knee Surg 2008; 21 (4) 320-326
- 13 Wang H, Simpson KJ, Chamnongkich S, Kinsey T, Mahoney OM. A biomechanical comparison between the single-axis and multi-axis total knee arthroplasty systems for the stand-to-sit movement. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 2005; 20 (4) 428-433
- 14 Harwin SF, Kester M. Single radius total knee arthroplasty: PCL sacrifice without substitution yields excellent outcomes minimum 8-year follow-up. Surg Technol Int 2010; 19: 191-198
- 15 Heiberg KE, Bruun-Olsen V, Mengshoel AM. Pain and recovery of physical functioning nine months after total knee arthroplasty. J Rehabil Med 2010; 42 (7) 614-619
- 16 Brander VA, Malhotra S, Jet J, Heinemann AW, Stulberg SD. Outcome of hip and knee arthroplasty in persons aged 80 years and older. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1997; (345) 67-78
- 17 Zicat B, Rorabeck CH, Bourne RB, Devane PA, Nott L. Total knee arthroplasty in the octogenarian. J Arthroplasty 1993; 8 (4) 395-400
- 18 Birdsall PD, Hayes JH, Cleary R, Pinder IM, Moran CG, Sher JL. Health outcome after total knee replacement in the very elderly. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1999; 81 (4) 660-662
- 19 Jones CA, Voaklander DC, Johnston DW, Suarez-Almazor ME. The effect of age on pain, function, and quality of life after total hip and knee arthroplasty. Arch Intern Med 2001; 161 (3) 454-460
- 20 Sastre S, Sanchez MD, Lozano L, Orient F, Fontg F, Nuñez M. Total knee arthroplasty: better short-term results after subvastus approach: a randomized, controlled study. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2009; 17 (10) 1184-1188
- 21 Weinhardt C, Barisic M, Bergmann EG, Heller KD. Early results of subvastus versus medial parapatellar approach in primary total knee arthroplasty. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2004; 124 (6) 401-403