European guidelines for quality assurance in colorectal cancer screening and diagnosis. First Edition – Colonoscopic surveillance following adenoma removal

Multidisciplinary, evidence-based guidelines for quality assurance in colorectal cancer screening and diagnosis have been developed by experts in a project coordinated by the International Agency for Research on Cancer. The full guideline document covers the entire process of population-based screening. It consists of 10 chapters and over 250 recommendations, graded according to the strength of the recommendation and the supporting evidence. The 450-page guidelines and the extensive evidence base have been published by the European Commission. The chapter on colonoscopic surveillance following adenoma removal includes 24 graded recommendations. The content of the chapter is presented here to promote international discussion and collaboration by making the principles and standards recommended in the new EU Guidelines known to a wider professional and scientific community. Following these recommendations has the potential to enhance the control of colorectal cancer through improvement in the quality and effectiveness of surveillance and other elements in the screening process, including multi-disciplinary diagnosis and management of the disease.

Keywords

mass screening - colorectal neoplasms - colonoscopic surveillance algorithm - polypectomy - evidence-based guidelines - population-based programme

• References

• 1 Alberts DS, Martinez ME, Hess LM et al. Phase III trial of ursodeoxycholic acid to prevent colorectal adenoma recurrence. J Natl Cancer Inst 2005; 97: 846-853
• 2 Alberts DS, Martinez ME, Roe DJ et al. Lack of effect of a high-fiber cereal supplement on the recurrence of colorectal adenomas. Phoenix Colon Cancer Prevention Physiciansʼ Network. N Engl J Med 2000; 342: 1156-1162
• 3 Arber N, Eagle CJ, Spicak J et al. Celecoxib for the prevention of colorectal adenomatous polyps. N Engl J Med 2006; 355: 885-895
• 4 Atkin WS, Morson BC, Cuzick J. Long-term risk of colorectal cancer after excision of rectosigmoid adenomas. N Engl J Med 1992; 326: 658-662
• 5 Atkin WS, Saunders BP. Surveillance guidelines after removal of colorectal adenomatous polyps. Gut 2002; 51: 6-9
• 6 Austoker J, Giordano L, Hewitson P et al. European guidelines for quality assurance in colorectal cancer screening and diagnosis. First edition. Communication. Endoscopy 2012; 44: SE164-SE185
• 7 Baron JA, Cole BF, Sandler RS et al. A randomized trial of aspirin to prevent colorectal adenomas. N Engl J Med 2003; 348: 891-899
• 8 Baron JA, Sandler RS, Bresalier RS et al. A randomized trial of rofecoxib for the chemoprevention of colorectal adenomas. Gastroenterology 2006; 131: 1674-1682
• 9 Baron JA, Tosteson TD, Wargovich MJ et al. Calcium supplementation and rectal mucosal proliferation: a randomized controlled trial. J Natl Cancer Inst 1995; 87: 1303-1307
• 10 Baxter NN, Goldwasser MA, Paszat LF et al. Association of colonoscopy and death from colorectal cancer. Ann Intern Med 2009; 150: 1-8
• 11 Bensen S, Mott LA, Dain B et al. The colonoscopic miss rate and true one-year recurrence of colorectal neoplastic polyps. Polyp Prevention Study Group.. Am J Gastroenterol 1999; 94: 194-199
• 12 Bertagnolli MM, Eagle CJ, Zauber AG et al. Celecoxib for the prevention of sporadic colorectal adenomas. N Engl J Med 2006; 355: 873-884
• 13 Bjork J, Borjesson L, Hertervig E et al. Sporadic colorectal polyps. Updated guidelines for endoscopic surveillance. Lakartidningen 2003; 100: 2584-8 , 2590
• 14 Blumberg D, Opelka FG, Hicks TC et al. Significance of a normal surveillance colonoscopy in patients with a history of adenomatous polyps. Dis Colon Rectum 2000; 43: 1084-1091
• 15 Bonelli L, Martines H, Conio M et al. Family history of colorectal cancer as a risk factor for benign and malignant tumours of the large bowel. A case-control study.. Int J Cancer 1988; 41: 513-517
• 16 Bonithon-Kopp C, Piard F, Fenger C et al. Colorectal adenoma characteristics as predictors of recurrence. Dis Colon Rectum 2004; 47: 323-333
• 17 Boparai KS, Mathus-Vliegen EM, Koornstra JJ et al. Increased colorectal cancer risk during follow-up in patients with hyperplastic polyposis syndrome: a multicentre cohort study. Gut 2010; 59: 1094-1100
• 18 Brenner H, Chang-Claude J, Seiler CM et al. Does a negative screening colonoscopy ever need to be repeated?. Gut 2006; 55: 1145-1150
• 19 Bressler B, Paszat LF, Vinden C et al. Colonoscopic miss rates for right-sided colon cancer: a population-based analysis. Gastroenterology 2004; 127: 452-456
• 20 Burt R, Jass J. Hyperplastic Polyposis. World Health Organisation classification of tumours: Pathology and genetics of tumours of the digestive system. Lyon: IARC Press; 2000: 135-136
• 21 Cafferty FH, Wong JM, Yen AM et al. Findings at follow-up endoscopies in subjects with suspected colorectal abnormalities: effects of baseline findings and time to follow-up. Cancer J 2007; 13: 263-270
• 22 Cannon-Albright LA, Skolnick MH, Bishop DT et al. Common inheritance of susceptibility to colonic adenomatous polyps and associated colorectal cancers. N Engl J Med 1988; 319: 533-537
• 23 Chu DZ, Chansky K, Alberts DS et al. Adenoma recurrences after resection of colorectal carcinoma: results from the Southwest Oncology Group 9041 calcium chemoprevention pilot study. Ann Surg Oncol 2003; 10: 870-875
• 24 Costantini M, Sciallero S, Giannini A et al. Interobserver agreement in the histologic diagnosis of colorectal polyps. the experience of the multicenter adenoma colorectal study (SMAC). J Clin Epidemiol 2003; 56: 209-214
• 25 Council of the European Union. Council Recommendation of 2 December 2003 on cancer screening (2003/878/EC). Off J Eur Union; 2003: 34-38
• 26 Di Gregorio C, Benatti P, Losi L et al. Incidence and survival of patients with Dukes' A (stages T1 and T2) colorectal carcinoma: a 15-year population-based study. Int J Colorectal Dis 2005; 20: 147-154
• 27 Eide TJ. Risk of colorectal cancer in adenoma-bearing individuals within a defined population. Int J Cancer 1986; 38: 173-176
• 28 Farrar WD, Sawhney MS, Nelson DB et al. Colorectal cancers found after a complete colonoscopy. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2006; 4: 1259-1264
• 29 Ferlay J, Shin HR, Bray F et al. GLOBOCAN 2008 v1.2, Cancer Incidence and Mortality Worldwide: IARC CancerBase No. 10. [Internet] 2010 http://globocan.iarc.fr Accessed 1/9/2011
• 30 Greenberg ER, Baron JA, Tosteson TD. Polyp Prevention Study Group et al. A clinical trial of antioxidant vitamins to prevent colorectal adenoma.. N Engl J Med 1994; 331: 141-147
• 31 Halloran S, Launoy G, Zappa M. European guidelines for quality assurance in colorectal cancer screening and diagnosis. First edition. Faecal Occult Blood Testing. Endoscopy 2012; 44: SE65-SE87
• 32 Heresbach D, Barrioz T, Lapalus MG et al. Miss rate for colorectal neoplastic polyps: a prospective multicenter study of back-to-back video colonoscopies. Endoscopy 2008; 40: 284-290
• 33 Hixson LJ, Fennerty MB, Sampliner RE et al. Prospective study of the frequency and size distribution of polyps missed by colonoscopy. J Natl Cancer Inst 1990; 82: 1769-1772
• 34 Hoff G, Sauar J, Hofstad B et al. The Norwegian guidelines for surveillance after polypectomy: 10-year intervals. Scand J Gastroenterol 1996; 31: 834-836
• 35 Hyman NH, Anderson P, Blasyk H. Hyperplastic polyposis and the risk of colorectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 2004; 47: 2101-2104
• 36 Imperiale TF, Glowinski EA, Lin-Cooper C et al. Five-year risk of colorectal neoplasia after negative screening colonoscopy. N Engl J Med 2008; 359: 1218-1224
• 37 Imperiale TF, Wagner DR, Lin CY et al. Risk of advanced proximal neoplasms in asymptomatic adults according to the distal colorectal findings. N Engl J Med 2000; 343: 169-174
• 38 Khoury DA, Opelka FG, Beck DE et al. Colon surveillance after colorectal cancer surgery. Dis Colon Rectum 1996; 39: 252-256
• 39 Kronborg O, Jorgensen OD, Fenger C et al. Three randomized long-term surveillance trials in patients with sporadic colorectal adenomas. Scand J Gastroenterol 2006; 41: 737-743
• 40 Laiyemo AO, Pinsky PF, Marcus PM et al. Utilization and yield of surveillance colonoscopy in the continued follow-up study of the polyp prevention trial. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2009; 7: 562-567
• 41 Landsorp-Vogelaar I, von Karsa L. European guidelines for quality assurance in colorectal cancer screening and diagnosis. First edition. Introduction. Endoscopy 2012; 44: SE15-SE30
• 42 Li D, Jin C, McCulloch C et al. Association of large serrated polyps with synchronous advanced colorectal neoplasia. Am J Gastroenterol 2009; 104: 695-702
• 43 Lieberman D, Moravec M, Holub J et al. Polyp size and advanced histology in patients undergoing colonoscopy screening: implications for CT colonography. Gastroenterology 2008; 135: 1100-1105
• 44 Lieberman DA, Holub J, Eisen G et al. Utilization of colonoscopy in the United States: results from a national consortium. Gastrointest Endosc 2005; 62: 875-883
• 45 Lieberman DA, Weiss DG, Bond JH et al. Use of colonoscopy to screen asymptomatic adults for colorectal cancer. Veterans Affairs Cooperative Study Group 380. N Engl J Med 2000; 343: 162-168
• 46 Lieberman DA, Weiss DG, Harford WV et al. Five-year colon surveillance after screening colonoscopy. Gastroenterology 2007; 133: 1077-1085
• 47 Lotfi AM, Spencer RJ, Ilstrup DM et al. Colorectal polyps and the risk of subsequent carcinoma. Mayo Clin Proc 1986; 61: 337-343
• 48 Lund JN, Scholefield JH, Grainge MJ et al. Risks, costs, and compliance limit colorectal adenoma surveillance: lessons from a randomised trial. Gut 2001; 49: 91-96
• 49 Macrae FA, Tan KG, Williams CB. Towards safer colonoscopy: a report on the complications of 5000 diagnostic or therapeutic colonoscopies. Gut 1983; 24: 376-383
• 50 Malila N, Senore C, Armaroli P. European guidelines for quality assurance in colorectal cancer screening and diagnosis. First edition. Organisation. Endoscopy 2012; 44: SE41-SE48
• 51 Martinez ME, Baron JA, Lieberman DA et al. A pooled analysis of advanced colorectal neoplasia diagnoses after colonoscopic polypectomy. Gastroenterology 2009; 136: 832-841
• 52 Martinez ME, Sampliner R, Marshall JR et al. Adenoma characteristics as risk factors for recurrence of advanced adenomas. Gastroenterology 2001; 120: 1077-1083
• 53 Minozzi S, Armaroli P, Banzi R et al. European guidelines for quality assurance in colorectal cancer screening and diagnosis – First edition. Appendix 1: Systematic evidence review. 2010 http://bookshop.europa.eu/en/european-guidelines-for-quality-assurance-in-colorectal-cancer-screening-and-diagnosis-pbND3210390/ Accessed 11/2/2012
• 54 Minozzi S, Armaroli P, Segnan N. European guidelines for quality assurance in colorectal cancer screening and diagnosis. First edition. Principles of evidence assessment and methods for reaching recommendations. Endoscopy 2012; 44: SE9-SE14
• 55 Morales TG, Sampliner RE, Garewal HS et al. The difference in colon polyp size before and after removal. Gastrointest Endosc 1996; 43: 25-28
• 56 Moss S, Ancelle-Park R, Brenner H. European guidelines for quality assurance in colorectal cancer screening and diagnosis. First edition. Evaluation and interpretation of screening outcomes. Endoscopy 2012;
• 57 Muto T, Bussey HJ, Morson BC. The evolution of cancer of the colon and rectum. Cancer 1975; 36: 2251-2270
• 58 Neklason DW, Thorpe BL, Ferrandez A et al. Colonic adenoma risk in familial colorectal cancer--a study of six extended kindreds. Am J Gastroenterol 2008; 103: 2577-2584
• 59 Nivatvongs S. Complications in colonoscopic polypectomy. An experience with 1,555 polypectomies. Dis Colon Rectum 1986; 29: 825-830
• 60 Noshirwani KC, Van Stolk RU, Rybicki LA et al. Adenoma size and number are predictive of adenoma recurrence: implications for surveillance colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 2000; 51: 433-437
• 61 Nozaki R, Takagi K, Takano M et al. Clinical investigation of colorectal cancer detected by follow-up colonoscopy after endoscopic polypectomy. Dis Colon Rectum 1997; 40: 16-S22
• 62 Nusko G, Mansmann U, Kirchner T et al. Risk related surveillance following colorectal polypectomy. Gut 2002; 51: 424-428
• 63 Pabby A, Schoen RE, Weissfeld JL et al. Analysis of colorectal cancer occurrence during surveillance colonoscopy in the dietary Polyp Prevention Trial. Gastrointest Endosc 2005; 61: 385-391
• 64 Pariente A, Milan C, Lafon J et al. Colonoscopic screening in first-degree relatives of patients with “sporadic” colorectal cancer: a case-control study. The Association Nationale des Gastroenterologues des Hopitaux and Registre Bourguignon des Cancers Digestifs (INSERM CRI 9505). Gastroenterology 1998; 115: 7-12
• 65 Quirke P, Risio M, Lambert R et al. European guidelines for quality assurance in colorectal cancer screening and diagnosis. First edition. Quality assurance in pathology in colorectal cancer screening and diagnosis. Endoscopy 2012; 44: SE116-SE130
• 66 Ransohoff DF, Lang CA, Kuo HS. Colonoscopic surveillance after polypectomy: considerations of cost effectiveness. Ann Intern Med 1991; 114: 177-182
• 67 Rex DK. Colonoscopic withdrawal technique is associated with adenoma miss rates. Gastrointest Endosc 2000; 51: 33-36
• 68 Rex DK, Bond JH, Winawer S et al. Quality in the technical performance of colonoscopy and the continuous quality improvement process for colonoscopy: recommendations of the U.S. Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer. Am J Gastroenterol 2002; 97: 1296-1308
• 69 Rex DK, Cutler CS, Lemmel GT et al. Colonoscopic miss rates of adenomas determined by back-to-back colonoscopies. Gastroenterology 1997; 112: 24-28
• 70 Rex DK, Kahi CJ, Levin B et al. Guidelines for colonoscopy surveillance after cancer resection: a consensus update by the American Cancer Society and US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer. CA Cancer J Clin 2006; 56: 160-167
• 71 Rex DK, Rahmani EY, Haseman JH et al. Relative sensitivity of colonoscopy and barium enema for detection of colorectal cancer in clinical practice. Gastroenterology 1997; 112: 17-23
• 72 Robertson DJ, Greenberg ER, Beach M et al. Colorectal cancer in patients under close colonoscopic surveillance. Gastroenterology 2005; 129: 34-41
• 73 Rosen L, Bub DS, Reed JF et al. Hemorrhage following colonoscopic polypectomy. Dis Colon Rectum 1993; 36: 1126-1131
• 74 Saini SD, Kim HM, Schoenfeld P. Incidence of advanced adenomas at surveillance colonoscopy in patients with a personal history of colon adenomas: a meta-analysis and systematic review. Gastrointest Endosc 2006; 64: 614-626
• 75 Schatzkin A, Lanza E, Corle D. Polyp Prevention Trial Study Group et al. Lack of effect of a low-fat, high-fiber diet on the recurrence of colorectal adenomas. N Engl J Med 2000; 342: 1149-1155
• 76 Schmiegel W, Reinacher-Schick A, Arnold D et al. Update S3-guideline “colorectal cancer” 2008. Z Gastroenterol 2008; 46: 799-840
• 77 Schoen RE, Gerber LD, Margulies C. The pathologic measurement of polyp size is preferable to the endoscopic estimate. Gastrointest Endosc 1997; 46: 492-496
• 78 Schoenfeld P, Cash B, Flood A et al. Colonoscopic screening of average-risk women for colorectal neoplasia. N Engl J Med 2005; 352: 2061-2068
• 79 Schreiner MA, Weiss DG, Lieberman DA. Proximal and large hyperplastic and nondysplastic serrated polyps detected by colonoscopy are associated with neoplasia. Gastroenterology 2010; 139: 1497-1502
• 80 Segnan N, Patnick J, von Karsa L (eds.) European guidelines for quality assurance in colorectal cancer screening and diagnosis – First edition. Luxembourg: European Commission, Publications Office of the European Union; 2010
• 81 Singh H, Turner D, Xue L et al. Risk of developing colorectal cancer following a negative colonoscopy examination: evidence for a 10-year interval between colonoscopies. JAMA 2006; 295: 2366-2373
• 82 Spencer RJ, Melton III LJ et al. Treatment of small colorectal polyps: a population-based study of the risk of subsequent carcinoma. Mayo Clin Proc 1984; 59: 305-310
• 83 Steele RJC, Pox C, Kuipers EJ et al. European guidelines for quality assurance in colorectal cancer screening and diagnosis. First edition. Management of lesions detected in colorectal cancer screening. Endoscopy 2012; 44: SE140-SE150
• 84 Steele RJC, Rey J-F, Lambert R. European guidelines for quality assurance in colorectal cancer screening and diagnosis. First edition. Professional requirements and training. Endoscopy 2012; 44: SE106-SE115
• 85 Valori R, Rey J-F, Atkin W et al. European guidelines for quality assurance in colorectal cancer screening and diagnosis. First edition. Quality assurance in endoscopy in colorectal screening and diagnosis. Endoscopy 2012; 44: SE88-SE105
• 86 Van Stolk RU, Beck GJ, Baron JA. The Polyp Prevention Study Group et al. Adenoma characteristics at first colonoscopy as predictors of adenoma recurrence and characteristics at follow-up. Gastroenterology 1998; 115: 13-18
• 87 von Karsa L, Anttila A, Ronco G et al. Cancer Screening in the European Union. Report on the implementation of the Council Recommendation on Cancer Screening - First Report. Luxembourg: European Commission; 2008 http://ec.europa.eu/health/archive/ph_determinants/genetics/documents/cancer_screening.pdf Accessed 11/2/2012
• 88 von Karsa L, Lignini TA, Patnick J et al. The dimensions of the CRC problem. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol 2010; 24: 381-396
• 89 Wark PA, Wu K, van ʼt VeerP et al. Family history of colorectal cancer: a determinant of advanced adenoma stage or adenoma multiplicity?. Int J Cancer 2009; 125: 413-420
• 90 Waye JD, Lewis BS, Yessayan S. Colonoscopy: a prospective report of complications. J Clin Gastroenterol 1992; 15: 347-351
• 91 Wegener M, Borsch G, Schmidt G. Colorectal adenomas. Distribution, incidence of malignant transformation, and rate of recurrence. Dis Colon Rectum 1986; 29: 383-387
• 92 Weston AP, Campbell DR. Diminutive colonic polyps: histopathology, spatial distribution, concomitant significant lesions, and treatment complications. Am J Gastroenterol 1995; 90: 24-28
• 93 Wilson JM, Jungner YG. Principles and practice of mass screening for disease. World Health Organization; 1968 http://whqlibdoc.who.int/php/WHO_PHP_34.pdf Accessed 11/2/2012
• 94 Winawer SJ, Zauber AG, Fletcher RH et al. Guidelines for colonoscopy surveillance after polypectomy: a consensus update by the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer and the American Cancer Society. Gastroenterology 2006; 130: 1872-1885
• 95 Winawer SJ, Zauber AG, O'Brien MJ. The National Polyp Study Workgroup et al. Randomized comparison of surveillance intervals after colonoscopic removal of newly diagnosed adenomatous polyps. N Engl J Med 1993; 328: 901-906
• 96 Yamaji Y, Mitsushima T, Ikuma H et al. Incidence and recurrence rates of colorectal adenomas estimated by annually repeated colonoscopies on asymptomatic Japanese. Gut 2004; 53: 568-572
• 97 Zauber A, Winawer S, Bond J et al. Long term National Polyp Study (NPS) data on post-polypectomy surveillance. Endoscopy 1999; 31: 13