Download PDF
J Knee Surg 2014; 27(01): 077-082
DOI: 10.1055/s-0033-1349401
Original Article
Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

Incidence of Bicompartmental Osteoarthritis in Patients Undergoing Total and Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty: Is the Time Ripe for a Less Radical Treatment?

Richard David Heekin
1   Heekin Orthopedic Specialists, St. Vincent's Medical Center, Jacksonville, Florida
,
Alexander A. Fokin
2   Department of Research, Heekin Institute for Orthopedic Research, Jacksonville, Florida
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

08 February 2013

02 June 2013

Publication Date:
19 July 2013 (online)

    Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

We sought to determine the incidence of bicompartmental osteoarthritis among knee replacement patients for possible bone-sparing procedures. In 259 consecutive Knee Registry subjects undergoing total or unicondylar knee arthroplasty, all three compartments of the knee joint were evaluated. Radiographic images and preoperative cruciate ligaments assessment combined with intraoperative cartilage grading using Outerbridge classification was implemented for patients' evaluations. Among the candidates for knee replacement arthroplasty, 59% had osteoarthritis in all three compartments, 28% had bicompartmental disease, and 4% had unicompartmental disease. Nine percent of patients exhibited inconclusive osteoarthritis pattern. Only 5% of the patients were found to have cruciate ligaments impairment. Older patients ( > 65 years) were significantly more likely to have bi- and tricompartmental disease. We had found that 28% of our registry population had bicompartmental disease and infrequent impairment of cruciate ligaments, indicating that between one-fourth and one-third of patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty could be considered for bone preserving bicompartmental knee arthroplasty.

Keywords

bicompartmental osteoarthritis - bone-sparing arthroplasty
 

  • References

  • 1 Beard DJ, Pandit H, Ostlere S, Jenkins C, Dodd CAF, Murray DW. Pre-operative clinical and radiological assessment of the patellofemoral joint in unicompartmental knee replacement and its influence on outcome. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2007; 89 (12) 1602-1607
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 2 Kang SN, Smith TO, Sprenger De Rover WB, Walton NP. Pre-operative patellofemoral degenerative changes do not affect the outcome after medial Oxford unicompartmental knee replacement: a report from an independent centre. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2011; 93 (4) 476-478
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 3 Pandit H, Beard DJ, Jenkins C , et al. Combined anterior cruciate reconstruction and Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2006; 88 (7) 887-892
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 4 Rolston L, Bresch J, Engh G , et al. Bicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a bone-sparing, ligament-sparing, and minimally invasive alternative for active patients. Orthopedics 2007; 30 (8)) (Suppl): 70-73
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 5 Fridén T, Roberts D, Ageberg E, Waldén M, Zätterström R. Review of knee proprioception and the relation to extremity function after an anterior cruciate ligament rupture. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2001; 31 (10) 567-576
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 6 Dhillon MS, Bali K, Prabhakar S. Proprioception in anterior cruciate ligament deficient knees and its relevance in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Indian J Orthop 2011; 45 (4) 294-300
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 7 Newman JH, Ackroyd CE, Shah NA. Unicompartmental or total knee replacement? Five-year results of a prospective, randomised trial of 102 osteoarthritic knees with unicompartmental arthritis. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1998; 80 (5) 862-865
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 8 Laurencin CT, Zelicof SB, Scott RD, Ewald FC. Unicompartmental versus total knee arthroplasty in the same patient. A comparative study. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1991; (273) 151-156
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 9 Rupprecht TN, Oczipka F, Lüring C, Pennekamp PH, Grifka J. Is there a correlation between the clinical, radiological and intrasurgical findings of osteoarthritis of the knee? A Prospective study on 103 patients. Z Orthop Unfall 2007; 145 (4) 430-435
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 10 Duncan RC, Hay EM, Saklatvala J, Croft PR. Prevalence of radiographic osteoarthritis—it all depends on your point of view. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2006; 45 (6) 757-760
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 11 Ledingham J, Regan M, Jones A, Doherty M. Radiographic patterns and associations of osteoarthritis of the knee in patients referred to hospital. Ann Rheum Dis 1993; 52 (7) 520-526
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 12 Outerbridge RE, Dunlop JA. The problem of chondromalacia patellae. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1975; 110 (110) 177-196
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 13 Cameron ML, Briggs KK, Steadman JR. Reproducibility and reliability of the outerbridge classification for grading chondral lesions of the knee arthroscopically. Am J Sports Med 2003; 31 (1) 83-86
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 14 Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Prevalence of disabilities and associated health conditions among adults—United States, 1999. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2001; 50 (7) 120-125
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 15 Ritter MA, Faris PM, Thong AE, Davis KE, Meding JB, Berend ME. Intra-operative findings in varus osteoarthritis of the knee. An analysis of pre-operative alignment in potential candidates for unicompartmental arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2004; 86 (1) 43-47
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 16 Thomas RH, Resnick D, Alazraki NP, Daniel D, Greenfield R. Compartmental evaluation of osteoarthritis of the knee. A comparative study of available diagnostic modalities. Radiology 1975; 116 (3) 585-594
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 17 Rodrigez-Merchan EC, Gomez-Cordero P. The Outerbridge Classification predicts the need for patellar resurfacing in TKA. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2010; 468: 1254-1257
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 18 Noble PC, Conditt MA, Cook KF, Mathis KB. The John Insall Award: Patient expectations affect satisfaction with total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2006; 452: 35-43
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 19 Bourne RB, Chesworth BM, Davis AM, Mahomed NN, Charron KDJ. Patient satisfaction after total knee arthroplasty: who is satisfied and who is not?. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2010; 468 (1) 57-63
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 20 Suda AJ, Seeger JB, Bitsch RG, Krueger M, Clarius M. Are patients' expectations of hip and knee arthroplasty fulfilled? A prospective study of 130 patients. Orthopedics 2010; 33 (2) 76-80
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 21 Dalury DF, Fisher DA, Adams MJ, Gonzales RA. Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty compares favorably to total knee arthroplasty in the same patient. Orthopedics 2009; 32 (4) pii
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 22 Leffler J, Scheys L, Planté-Bordeneuve T , et al. Joint kinematics following bi-compartmental knee replacement during daily life motor tasks. Gait Posture 2012; 36 (3) 454-460
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 23 Wang H, Frame J, Rolston L. Influence of bicompartmental knee replacement on stand-to-sit movement. Res Q Exerc Sport 2012; 83 (2) 136-142
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 24 Palumbo BT, Henderson ER, Edwards PK, Burris RB, Gutiérrez S, Raterman SJ. Initial experience of the Journey-Deuce bicompartmental knee prosthesis: a review of 36 cases. J Arthroplasty 2011; 26 (6) (Suppl): 40-45
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 25 Morrison TA, Nyce JD, Macaulay WB, Geller JA. Early adverse results with bicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a prospective cohort comparison to total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2011; 26 (6)) (Suppl): 35-39
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 26 Thienpont E, Price A. Bicompartmental knee arthroplasty of the patellofemoral and medial compartments. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2012;
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 27 Müller M, Matziolis G, Falk R, Hommel H. The bicompartmental knee joint prosthesis Journey Deuce: failure analysis and optimization strategies. Orthopade 2012; 41 (11) 894-904
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 28 Naziri Q, Pivec R, Johnson AJ , et al. New technologies in knee arthroplasty. Surg Technol Int 2012; XXII (1) xxii
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar