Gesundheitsforschung – Versorgungsforschung zur Verbesserung der Qualität

Neben der biomedizinischen Grundlagenforschung, der krankheitsorientierten Forschung im Labor und der klassischen klinischen Forschung („klinische Studie“) gewinnt die Versorgungsforschung als 4. Pfeiler der Gesundheitsforschung auch in der Chirurgie zunehmend an Bedeutung.

• Literatur

• 1 Sahm M, Koch A, Schmidt U et al. Acute appendicitis – clinical health-service research on the current surgical therapy. Zbl Chir 2013; 138: 270-277
• 2 Christoffersen MW, Helgstrand F, Rosenberg J et al. Lower reoperation rate for recurrence after mesh versus sutured elective repair in small umbilical and epigastric hernias. A nationwide register study. World J Surg 2013; 37: 2548-2552
• 3 Kostuj T, Smektala R, Schulze-Raestrup U et al. The influence of timing of surgery on mortality and early complications in femoral neck fractures, by surgical procedure: an analysis of 22, 566 cases from the German External Quality Assurance Program. Unfallchirurg 2013; 116: 131-137
• 4 Smektala R, Schleiz W, Fischer B et al. Medial femoral neck fractures: possible reasons for delayed surgery : Part 2: Results of data from external inpatient quality assurance within the framework of secondary data evaluation. Unfallchirurg 2014; 117: 128-137
• 5 Müller-Mai CM, Schulze Raestrup US, Kostuj T et al. One-year outcomes for proximal femoral fractures: Posthospital analysis of mortality and care levels based on health insurance data. Unfallchirurg 20.12.2013; [Epub ahead of print]
• 6 Judge A, Batra RN, Thomas GE et al. Body mass index is not a clinically meaningful predictor of patient reported outcomes of Knappschaftskrankenhausprimary hip replacement surgery: prospective cohort study. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2014; 22: 431-439
• 7 Mota RE. Cost-effectiveness analysis of early versus late total hip replacement in Italy. Value Health 2013; 16: 267-279
• 8 Søgaard R, Fischer BM, Mortensen J et al. Preoperative staging of lung cancer with PET / CT: cost-effectiveness evaluation alongside a randomized controlled trial. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2011; 38: 802-809
• 9 Mayer EK, Purkayastha S, Athanasiou T et al. Assessing the quality of the volume-outcome relationship in uro-oncology. BJU Int 2009; 103: 341-349
• 10 Wong SL, McCahill LE, Edge SB et al. Getting to better cancer care: results of a society of surgical oncology survey. Ann Surg Oncol 2008; 15: 2363-2371
• 11 Young GJ, Charns MP, Barbour GL. Quality improvement in the US Veterans Health Administration. Int J Qual Health Care 1997; 9: 183-188
• 12 Zöller B, Ji J, Sundquist J et al. Shared and nonshared familial susceptibility to surgically treated inguinal hernia, femoral hernia, incisional hernia, epigastric hernia, and umbilical hernia. J Am Coll Surg 2013; 217: 289-299
• 13 O’Brien K, Craven R. Pitfalls in orthodontic health service research. Br J Orthod 1995; 22: 353-356
• 14 Eikermann M, Pieper D, Neugebauer EA. Patient safety in health service research. Unfallchirurg 2013; 116: 872-876
• 15 Talsnes O, Vinje T, Gjertsen JE et al. Perioperative mortality in hip fracture patients treated with cemented and uncemented hemiprosthesis: a register study of 11, 210 patients. Int Orthop 2013; 37: 1135-1140
• 16 Wesselmann S, Winter A, Ferencz J et al. Documented quality of care in certified colorectal cancer centers in Germany: German Cancer Society benchmarking report for 2013. Int J Colorectal Dis 04.03.2014; [Epub ahead of print]