Subscribe to RSS
DOI: 10.1055/s-0034-1377211
Advanced rectal carcinoma caused by tumor cell implantation after curative endoscopic submucosal dissection of an intramucosal rectal carcinoma
Publication History
Publication Date:
10 June 2015 (online)
A 62-year-old man was referred for treatment of a large granular-type laterally spreading tumor in the distal rectum ([Fig. 1 a]). We diagnosed the tumor as being an intramucosal carcinoma using magnifying endoscopy. En bloc resection was performed by endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) ([Fig. 1 b] and [Fig. 2]).
Histopathologic examination of the resected specimen showed an intramucosal adenocarcinoma with adenomatous components and tumor-free resection margins around the entire circumference of the tumor with no evidence of lymphovascular invasion ([Fig. 3 a, b]). The adenocarcinoma was limited to the mucosal layer reaching to the muscularis mucosa but not invading it. The vertical resection margin was also free of cancer around the entire lesion with the thinnest and thickest tumor-free submucosal depths being 360 μm and 1280 μm, respectively ([Fig. 3 c, d]). The procedure was considered to have been a curative resection (R0), and the patient was discharged without complications.
A follow-up colonoscopy performed 1 year later revealed a local recurrence at the ESD scar ([Fig. 4]). Surgical resection of the tumor was performed. Histopathologically, the carcinoma had invaded to the muscularis propria; however, the resected lymph nodes showed no evidence of metastasis.
Incomplete resection with residual tumor and tumor cell implantation have both been reported to be recognized causes of local recurrence after surgical resection of rectal carcinoma. Exfoliated free viable tumor cells in the remaining rectal lumen can implant at the anastomosis and on the raw surface [1] [2] [3]. In this case residual tumor was not seen near the ESD ulcer on video review. A post-ESD ulcer may, however, serve as a raw surface on which free viable tumor cells can implant. Therefore, local recurrence of the rectal carcinoma may have been caused by tumor cell implantation.
To the best of our knowledge, this is the first description of a local recurrence of early rectal carcinoma after curative ESD in the absence of the usual risk factors for local recurrence of intramucosal carcinoma after endoscopic treatment, which include positive surgical margins and piecemeal resection.
Tajika et al. [4] reported a case of tumor cell implantation from a rectosigmoid colonic cancer at the endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) site of a synchronous rectal carcinoid. This report supports the concept of tumor cell implantation in an ESD ulcer. Endoscopists should be aware of this potential risk when performing ESD for large colorectal tumors.
Endoscopy_UCTN_Code_TTT_1AQ_2AD
-
References
- 1 Matsuda A, Kishi T, Musso G et al. The effect of intraoperative rectal washout on local recurrence after rectal cancer surgery: a meta-analysis. Ann Surg Oncol 2013; 20: 856-863
- 2 Morgan CN. Cancer of the rectum. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 1951; 9: 13-24
- 3 Umpleby HC, Fermor B, Symes MO et al. Viability of exfoliated colorectal carcinoma cells. Br J Surg 1984; 71: 659-663
- 4 Tajika M, Niwa Y, Bhatia V et al. A first report of tumor cell implantation after EMR in a patient with rectosigmoid cancer. Gastrointest Endosc 2012; 75: 1117-1118