Subscribe to RSS
DOI: 10.1055/s-0034-1377450
A new device for simultaneous manipulation of an endoscope and a treatment device during procedures: an ex vivo animal study
Publication History
submitted 09 September 2013
accepted after revision 12 June 2014
Publication Date:
01 August 2014 (online)
Background and study aims: Endoscopists must maneuver both endoscope and treatment device during procedures, requiring them to release their hand from the scope to manipulate the treatment device. Aiming to improve this situation, we developed a new device called the Thumb Drive.
Patients and methods: The Thumb Drive comprises a controller and catheter. After attaching the controller to the endoscope’s grip, the catheter is inserted into the forceps channel. The treatment device is then inserted into the Thumb Drive and fixed with its tip protruding from the endoscope tip. A single endoscopist resected 10 lesions in a porcine stomach by endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) using the Thumb Drive.
Results: All lesions were resected en bloc using this new device without any perforations. The mean incision, dissection, and operative times were 97.2 ± 48.7 seconds, 121.6 ± 53.6 seconds, and 218.8 ± 67.8 seconds, respectively.
Conclusions: The Thumb Drive enables the endoscopist to manipulate the treatment device with the thumb while handling the endoscope with the right hand during ESD. Its utility should be examined in in vivo studies as a next step.
-
References
- 1 Hoteya S, Iizuka T, Kikuchi D et al. Benefits of endoscopic submucosal dissection according to size and location of gastric neoplasm, compared with conventional mucosal resection. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2009; 24: 1102-1106
- 2 Takahashi H, Arimura Y, Masao H et al. Endoscopic submucosal dissection is superior to conventional endoscopic resection as a curative treatment for early squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus (with video). Gastrointest Endosc 2010; 72: 255-264
- 3 Saito Y, Uraoka T, Yamaguchi Y et al. A prospective, multicenter study of 1111 colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissections (with video). Gastrointest Endosc 2010; 72: 1217-1225
- 4 Iizuka T, Kikuchi D, Hoteya S et al. Endoscopic submucosal dissection for treatment of mesopharyngeal and hypopharyngeal carcinomas. Endoscopy 2009; 41: 113-117
- 5 Honda T, Yamamoto H, Osawa H et al. Endoscopic submucosal dissection for superficial duodenal neoplasms. Dig Endosc 2009; 21: 270-274
- 6 Kikuchi D, Iizuka T, Hoteya S et al. Usefulness of endoscopic ultrasound for the prediction of intraoperative bleeding of endoscopic submucosal dissection for gastric neoplasms. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2011; 26: 68-72
- 7 Jeong JY, Oh YH, Yu YH et al. Does submucosal fibrosis affect the results of endoscopic submucosal dissection of early gastric tumors?. Gastrointest Endosc 2012; 76: 59-66
- 8 Iizuka T, Kikuchi D, Hoteya S et al. A new technique for pharyngeal endoscopic submucosal dissection: peroral countertraction (with video). Gastrointest Endosc 2012; 76: 1034-1038
- 9 Sakamoto N, Osada T, Shibuya T et al. Endoscopic submucosal dissection of large colorectal tumors by using a novel spring-action S-O clip for traction (with video). Gastrointest Endosc 2009; 69: 1370-1374