Download PDF
Semin Hear 2014; 35(03): 193-205
DOI: 10.1055/s-0034-1383504
Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

Use of Wireless Technology for Children with Auditory Processing Disorders, Attention-Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder, and Language Disorders

Erin C. Schafer
1   Department of Speech and Hearing Sciences, University of North Texas, Denton, Texas
,
Jordan Traber
1   Department of Speech and Hearing Sciences, University of North Texas, Denton, Texas
,
Paige Layden
1   Department of Speech and Hearing Sciences, University of North Texas, Denton, Texas
,
Aneeqa Amin
1   Department of Speech and Hearing Sciences, University of North Texas, Denton, Texas
,
Katie Sanders
1   Department of Speech and Hearing Sciences, University of North Texas, Denton, Texas
,
Danielle Bryant
1   Department of Speech and Hearing Sciences, University of North Texas, Denton, Texas
,
Nicole Baldus
1   Department of Speech and Hearing Sciences, University of North Texas, Denton, Texas
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
25 July 2014 (online)

Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

There are several populations of children who have normal hearing but exhibit auditory listening difficulties in the classroom. Recent publications will be reviewed to support the use of wireless, remote microphone technology for improving speech-recognition performance in noise and classroom-listening abilities in children diagnosed with auditory processing disorders (APDs), attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), and autism spectrum disorders (ASDs). In addition, a series of case studies on children diagnosed with APDs, ADHD, ASDs, and/or language disorders will be presented to (1) support specific remote microphone-fitting procedures and (2) to report speech-recognition performance in noise; listening comprehension; and participant-, parent-, and teacher-rated listening behaviors following a trial period with the technology. The results of these case studies will validate fitting procedures for these populations with auditory listening difficulties and will provide additional, evidence-based support for the use of remote microphone technology for children diagnosed with APDs, ADHD, ASDs, and/or language disorders.

Keywords

Remote microphone technology - normal hearing - autism - auditory processing - attention deficit
 

  • References

  • 1 ASHA Practice Policy. Acoustics in Educational Settings: Position Statement. Washington, DC: American Speech-Language-Hearing Association; 2005
    CrossrefSearch in Google Scholar
  • 2 American National Standards Institute. Acoustical Performance Criteria, Design Requirements, and Guidelines for Schools, Part 1: Permanent Schools. Melville; NY: 2010. . ANSI S12.60–2010
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 3 Knecht HA, Nelson PB, Whitelaw GM, Feth LL. Background noise levels and reverberation times in unoccupied classrooms: predictions and measurements. Am J Audiol 2002; 11 (2) 65-71
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 4 Nelson EL, Smaldino J, Erler S, Garstecki D. Background noise levels and reverberation times in old and new elementary school classrooms. J Educ Audiol 2007; /2008 14: 16-22
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 5 Pugh KC, Miura CA, Asahara LLY. Noise levels among first, second, and third grade elementary school classrooms in Hawaii. J Educ Audiol 2006; 13: 32-38
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 6 Jamieson DG, Kranjc G, Yu K, Hodgetts WE. Speech intelligibility of young school-aged children in the presence of real-life classroom noise. J Am Acad Audiol 2004; 15 (7) 508-517
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 7 Neuman AC, Wroblewski M, Hajicek J, Rubinstein A. Combined effects of noise and reverberation on speech recognition performance of normal-hearing children and adults. Ear Hear 2010; 31 (3) 336-344
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 8 Schafer EC, Beeler S, Ramos H, Morais M, Monzingo J, Algier K. Developmental effects and spatial hearing in young children with normal-hearing sensitivity. Ear Hear 2012; 33 (6) e32-e43
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 9 Wróblewski M, Lewis DE, Valente DL, Stelmachowicz PG. Effects of reverberation on speech recognition in stationary and modulated noise by school-aged children and young adults. Ear Hear 2012; 33 (6) 731-744
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 10 Sanders DA. Noise conditions in normal school classrooms. Except Child 1965; 31: 344-353
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 11 Valente DL, Plevinsky HM, Franco JM, Heinrichs-Graham EC, Lewis DE. Experimental investigation of the effects of the acoustical conditions in a simulated classroom on speech recognition and learning in children. J Acoust Soc Am 2012; 131 (1) 232-246
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 12 Lagacé J, Jutras B, Giguère C, Gagné JP. Speech perception in noise: exploring the effect of linguistic context in children with and without auditory processing disorder. Int J Audiol 2011; 50 (6) 385-395
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 13 Rance G, Corben L, Delatycki M. Auditory processing deficits in children with Friedreich ataxia. J Child Neurol 2012; 27 (9) 1197-1203
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 14 Schafer EC, Mathews L, Mehta S , et al. Personal FM systems for children with autism spectrum disorders (ASD) and/or attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD): an initial investigation. J Commun Disord 2013; 46 (1) 30-52
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 15 Johnston KN, John AB, Kreisman NV, Hall III JW, Crandell CC. Multiple benefits of personal FM system use by children with auditory processing disorder (APD). Int J Audiol 2009; 48 (6) 371-383
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 16 Rance G, Corben LA, Du Bourg E, King A, Delatycki MB. Successful treatment of auditory perceptual disorder in individuals with Friedreich ataxia. Neuroscience 2010; 171 (2) 552-555
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 17 Sharma M, Purdy SC, Kelly AS. A randomized control trial of interventions in school-aged children with auditory processing disorders. Int J Audiol 2012; 51 (7) 506-518
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 18 Schafer EC, Bryant D, Sanders K , et al. Fitting and verification of frequency modulation (FM) systems on children with normal hearing. J Am Acad Audiol , In press
    PubMed
  • 19 American Academy of Audiology Clinical Practice Guidelines. Remote Microphone Hearing Assistance Technologies for Children and Youth from Birth to 21 Years. Reston, VA: American Academy of Audiology; 2008
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 20 Schafer EC, Bryant D, Sanders K , et al. Listening comprehension in background noise in children with normal hearing. Journal of Educational Audiology 2013; 19: 58-64
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 21 BKB-SIN: Bamford-Kowal-Bench Speech in Noise Test. Elk Grove, IL: Etymotic Research; 2005
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 22 Shield B, Dockrell JE. External and internal noise surveys of London primary schools. J Acoust Soc Am 2004; 115 (2) 730-738
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 23 Bowers L, Huisingh R, LoGiudice C. The Listening Comprehension Test 2. East Moline, IL: LinguiSystems Inc.; 2006
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 24 Schafer EC, Thibodeau LM. Speech recognition in noise in children with cochlear implants while listening in bilateral, bimodal, and FM-system arrangements. Am J Audiol 2006; 15 (2) 114-126
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 25 Anderson KL, Smaldino J. Children's Home Inventory of Listening Difficulties. Available at: http://successforkidswithhearingloss.com/tests . June 18, 2014
    PubMed
  • 26 Anderson K, Smaldino J, Spangler C. Listening Inventory for Education—Revised (L.I.F.E.-R.)—Student Appraisal of Listening Difficulty. Available at: http://successforkidswithhearingloss.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/LIFE-R_Photo_and_Question_Gallery_RE.pdf . June 18, 2014
    PubMed
  • 27 Anderson K, Smaldino J, Spangler C. Listening Inventory for Education—Revised (L.I.F.E.-R). Teacher Appraisal of Listening Difficulty. Available at: http://successforkidswithhearingloss.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/revised-Teacher-LIFE-R.pdf . June 18, 2014
    PubMed
  • 28 Smoski WJ, Brunt MA, Tannahill JC. Children's Auditory Performance Scale. Tampa, FL: Educational Audiology Association; 1998
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 29 Scollie S, Seewald R, Cornelisse L , et al. The Desired Sensation Level multistage input/output algorithm. Trends Amplif 2005; 9 (4) 159-197
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar