A Sound Therapy-Based Intervention to Expand the Auditory Dynamic Range for Loudness among Persons with Sensorineural Hearing Losses: A Randomized Placebo-Controlled Clinical Trial

Abstract

The primary aim of this research was to evaluate the validity, efficacy, and generalization of principles underlying a sound therapy–based treatment for promoting expansion of the auditory dynamic range (DR) for loudness. The basic sound therapy principles, originally devised for treatment of hyperacusis among patients with tinnitus, were evaluated in this study in a target sample of unsuccessfully fit and/or problematic prospective hearing aid users with diminished DRs (owing to their elevated audiometric thresholds and reduced sound tolerance). Secondary aims included: (1) delineation of the treatment contributions from the counseling and sound therapy components to the full-treatment protocol and, in turn, the isolated treatment effects from each of these individual components to intervention success; and (2) characterization of the respective dynamics for full, partial, and control treatments. Thirty-six participants with bilateral sensorineural hearing losses and reduced DRs, which affected their actual or perceived ability to use hearing aids, were enrolled in and completed a placebo-controlled (for sound therapy) randomized clinical trial. The 2 × 2 factorial trial design was implemented with or without various assignments of counseling and sound therapy. Specifically, participants were assigned randomly to one of four treatment groups (nine participants per group), including: (1) group 1—full treatment achieved with scripted counseling plus sound therapy implemented with binaural sound generators; (2) group 2—partial treatment achieved with counseling and placebo sound generators (PSGs); (3) group 3—partial treatment achieved with binaural sound generators alone; and (4) group 4—a neutral control treatment implemented with the PSGs alone. Repeated measurements of categorical loudness judgments served as the primary outcome measure. The full-treatment categorical-loudness judgments for group 1, measured at treatment termination, were significantly greater than the corresponding pretreatment judgments measured at baseline at 500, 2,000, and 4,000 Hz. Moreover, increases in their “uncomfortably loud” judgments (∼12 dB over the range from 500 to 4,000 Hz) were superior to those measured for either of the partial-treatment groups 2 and 3 or for control group 4. Efficacy, assessed by treatment-related criterion increases ≥ 10 dB for judgments of uncomfortable loudness, was superior for full treatment (82% efficacy) compared with that for either of the partial treatments (25% and 40% for counseling combined with the placebo sound therapy and sound therapy alone, respectively) or for the control treatment (50%). The majority of the group 1 participants achieved their criterion improvements within 3 months of beginning treatment. The treatment effect from sound therapy was much greater than that for counseling, which was statistically indistinguishable in most of our analyses from the control treatment. The basic principles underlying the full-treatment protocol are valid and have general applicability for expanding the DR among individuals with sensorineural hearing losses, who may often report aided loudness problems. The positive full-treatment effects were superior to those achieved for either counseling or sound therapy in virtual or actual isolation, respectively; however, the delivery of both components in the full-treatment approach was essential for an optimum treatment outcome.

Keywords

Sound tolerance - loudness discomfort level - hyperacusis - sound therapy

• References

• 1 Hazell JWP, Sheldrake JB. Hyperacusis and tinnitus. In: Aran JM, Dauman R, , eds. Tinnitus 91. Proceedings of the Fourth International Tinnitus Seminar. Amsterdam/New York: Kugler Publications; 1992: 245-248
• 2 Jastreboff PJ, Hazell JWP. A neurophysiological approach to tinnitus: clinical implications. Br J Audiol 1993; 27 (1) 7-17
• 3 Jastreboff PJ, Gray WC, Gold SL. Neurophysiological approach to tinnitus patients. Am J Otol 1996; 17 (2) 236-240
• 4 Jastreboff PJ, Hazell J. Tinnitus Retraining Therapy: Implementing the Neurophysiological Model. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press; 2004
• 5 Jastreboff PJ, Jastreboff MM. Tinnitus Retraining Therapy (TRT) as a method for treatment of tinnitus and hyperacusis patients. J Am Acad Audiol 2000; 11 (3) 162-177
• 6 Jastreboff MM, Jastreboff PJ. Decreased sound tolerance and tinnitus retraining therapy (TRT). Aust N Z Audiol 2002; 21: 74-81
• 7 Sammeth CA, Birman M, Hecox KE. Variability of most comfortable and uncomfortable loudness levels to speech stimuli in the hearing impaired. Ear Hear 1989; 10 (2) 94-100
• 8 Davis H, Hudgins CV, Marquis RJ , et al. The selection of hearing aids. Laryngoscope 1946; 56: 85-115 , 135–163
• 9 Silverman SR. Tolerance for pure tones and speech in normal and defective hearing. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1947; 56 (3) 658-677
• 10 Formby C, Gold SL. Modification of loudness discomfort level: evidence for adaptive chronic auditory gain and its clinical relevance. Semin Hear 2002; 23 (1) 21-34
• 11 Schmitz HD. Loudness discomfort level modification. J Speech Hear Res 1969; 12 (4) 807-817
• 12 Byrne D, Dirks D. Effects of acclimatization and deprivation on non-speech auditory abilities. Ear Hear 1996; 17 (3, Suppl): 29S-37S
• 13 Lindley G. Adaptation to loudness: implications for hearing aid fittings. Hear J 1999; 52: 50-57
• 14 Goldstein B, Shulman A. Tinnitus-hyperacusis and the loudness discomfort test—a preliminary report. Int Tinnitus J 1996; 2: 83-89
• 15 Baguley DM, Andersson G. Hyperacusis: Mechanisms, Diagnosis, and Therapies. Oxford, UK: Plural Publishing; 2007
• 16 Formby C, Gold SL, Keaser ML, Block KL, Hawley ML. Secondary benefits from tinnitus retraining therapy (TRT): clinically significant increases in loudness discomfort level and in the auditory dynamic range. Semin Hear 2007; 28 (4) 276-294
• 17 Sheldrake JB, Wood SM, Cooper HR. Practical aspects of the instrumental management of tinnitus. Br J Audiol 1985; 19 (2) 147-150
• 18 Reich G, Vernon J , eds. Proceedings of the Fifth International Tinnitus Seminar. Portland, OR: American Tinnitus Association; 1995
• 19 Hazell JWP , ed. Proceedings of the Sixth International Tinnitus Seminar. London, UK: The Tinnitus and Hyperacusis Centre; 1999
• 20 Patuzzi R , ed. Proceedings of the Seventh International Tinnitus Seminar. Perth, Australia: The University of Western Australia; 2002
• 21 Formby C , ed. Hyperacusis and Related Sound Tolerance Complaints: Differential Diagnosis, Treatment Effects, and Models. Semin Hear 2007;28(4):(Monograph)
• 22 Formby C, Sherlock LP, Gold SL, Hawley ML. Adaptive recalibration of chronic auditory gain. Semin Hear 2007; 28 (4) 295-302
• 23 Formby C, Sherlock LP, Gold SL. Adaptive plasticity of loudness induced by chronic attenuation and enhancement of the acoustic background. J Acoust Soc Am 2003; 114 (1) 55-58
• 24 Jastreboff PJ. Clinical implication of the neurophysiological model of tinnitus. In: Reich GE, Vernon JA, , eds. Proceedings of the 5th International Tinnitus Seminar. Portland, OR: American Tinnitus Association; 1994: 500-507
• 25 Carhart R, Jerger JF. Preferred method for clinical determination of pure-tone thresholds. J Speech Hear Disord 1959; 24: 330-345
• 26 Cox RM, Alexander GC, Taylor IM, Gray GA. The contour test of loudness perception. Ear Hear 1997; 18 (5) 388-400
• 27 Costa Jr PT, McCrae RR. NEO PI-R Professional Manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources, Inc.; 1992
• 28 Munro KJ, Blount J. Adaptive plasticity in brainstem of adult listeners following earplug-induced deprivation. J Acoust Soc Am 2009; 126 (2) 568-571
• 29 Muller KE, Fetterman BA. Regression and ANOVA: An Integrated Approach Using SAS Software. Cary, NC: SAS Institute Inc.; 2002: 330-333
• 30 Piantadosi S. Clinical Trials: A Methodologic Perspective. 2nd ed. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons; 2005
• 31 Gordis L. Epidemiology. 4th ed. Philadelphia, PA: Saunders; 2009
• 32 Dauman R, Bouscau-Faure F. Assessment and amelioration of hyperacusis in tinnitus patients. Acta Otolaryngol 2005; 125 (5) 503-509
• 33 Noreña AJ, Chery-Croze S. Enriched acoustic environment rescales auditory sensitivity. Neuroreport 2007; 18 (12) 1251-1255
• 34 McKinney CJ, Hazell JWP, Graham RL. Changes in loudness discomfort level and sensitivity to environmental sound with habituation based therapy. In: Hazell J, , ed. Proceedings of the Sixth International Tinnitus Seminar. London, UK: The Tinnitus and Hyperacusis Centre; 1999: 499-501
• 35 Jastreboff PJ, Jastreboff MM. Decreased sound tolerance. In: Snow JB, , ed. Tinnitus: Theory and Management. Hamilton, Ontario, Canada: Decker; 2004: 8-15
• 36 Hazell JWP, Sheldrake JB, Graham RL, Decreased sound tolerance: predisposing factors, triggers and outcomes after TRT. In: Patuzzi R. , ed. Proceedings of the Seventh International Tinnitus Seminar. Crawley, Perth, Australia: University of Western Australia; 2002: 255-261
• 37 Gu JW, Halpin CF, Nam EC, Levine RA, Melcher JR. Tinnitus, diminished sound-level tolerance, and elevated auditory activity in humans with clinically normal hearing sensitivity. J Neurophysiol 2010; 104 (6) 3361-3370
• 38 Davis PB, Paki B, Hanley PJ. Neuromonics tinnitus treatment: third clinical trial. Ear Hear 2007; 28 (2) 242-259
• 39 Gold SL, Formby C, Frederick EA, Suter C. Incremental shifts in loudness discomfort level among tinnitus patients with and without hyperacusis. In: Patuzzi R, , ed. Proceedings of the Seventh International Tinnitus Seminar. Crawley, Perth, Australia: University of Western Australia; 2002: 170-172