Limited Added Value of the Posterolateral Approach

Abstract

Background Posterolateral tibial plateau fractures (AO/OTA 41-B or 41-C) represent a minority of proximal tibia fractures. Numerous surgical approaches have been described, each with unique variations and limitations. The purpose of this study is to quantitatively and qualitatively compare the surface area and structures exposed by four surgical approaches to the posterolateral proximal tibia.

Methods Four published surgical approaches—direct posterolateral (DPL), transfibular (TF), posteromedial (PM), and anterolateral (AL)—were performed on 10 fresh-frozen cadavers. Once each exposure was obtained, a ruler was placed in the surgical field and calibrated digital images obtained. Overall, 10 bony and soft tissue landmarks were identified and the surgeon's ability to see or touch each landmark was recorded sequentially for each exposure.

Results An average of 3.9 ± 2.7 cm² of posterolateral proximal tibial cortex was exposed by the DPL approach with significantly more surface area exposed by the TF, PM, and AL approaches (p < 0.01). The AL and PM approaches revealed a significantly larger area of tibial metaphysis and, when used together, consistently exposed posterior metaphyseal and intra-articular structures.

Conclusion A combination of the AL and PM approaches allows comparable surgical exposure to the proximal tibial when compared with two posterolateral approaches. These approaches can be employed together for reduction and fixation of injuries to the posterolateral tibial plateau and allow direct evaluation of the articular surface. Dedicated posterolateral approaches should be reserved for certain clinical situations, including proximal tibiofibular joint fracture or dislocation.

Keywords

tibial plateau fracture - posterolateral - transfibular - cadaver study

• References

• 1 Hsieh C-H. Treatment of the posterolateral tibial plateau fractures using the anterior surgical approach. Int J Biomed Sci 2010; 6 (4) 316-320
• 2 Luo C-F, Sun H, Zhang B, Zeng B-F. Three-column fixation for complex tibial plateau fractures. J Orthop Trauma 2010; 24 (11) 683-692
• 3 Bhattacharyya T, McCarty III LP, Harris MB , et al. The posterior shearing tibial plateau fracture: treatment and results via a posterior approach. J Orthop Trauma 2005; 19 (5) 305-310
• 4 Chen H-W, Liu G-D, Ou S, Zhao G-S, Pan J, Wu L-J. Open reduction and internal fixation of posterolateral tibial plateau fractures through fibula osteotomy-free posterolateral approach. J Orthop Trauma 2014; 28 (9) 513-517
• 5 Carlson DA. Posterior bicondylar tibial plateau fractures. J Orthop Trauma 2005; 19 (2) 73-78
• 6 Waldrop JI, Macey TI, Trettin JC, Bourgeois WR, Hughston JC. Fractures of the posterolateral tibial plateau. Am J Sports Med 1988; 16 (5) 492-498
• 7 Yu G-R, Xia J, Zhou J-Q, Yang Y-F. Low-energy fracture of posterolateral tibial plateau: treatment by a posterolateral prone approach. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 2012; 72 (5) 1416-1423
• 8 Frosch K-H, Balcarek P, Walde T, Stürmer KM. A new posterolateral approach without fibula osteotomy for the treatment of tibial plateau fractures. J Orthop Trauma 2010; 24 (8) 515-520
• 9 Chang S-M, Zheng H-P, Li H-F , et al. Treatment of isolated posterior coronal fracture of the lateral tibial plateau through posterolateral approach for direct exposure and buttress plate fixation. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2009; 129 (7) 955-962
• 10 Tao J, Hang D-H, Wang Q-G , et al. The posterolateral shearing tibial plateau fracture: treatment and results via a modified posterolateral approach. Knee 2008; 15 (6) 473-479
• 11 Carlson DA. Bicondylar fracture of the posterior aspect of the tibial plateau. A case report and a modified operative approach. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1998; 80 (7) 1049-1052
• 12 Solomon LB, Stevenson AW, Baird RPV, Pohl AP. Posterolateral transfibular approach to tibial plateau fractures: technique, results, and rationale. J Orthop Trauma 2010; 24 (8) 505-514
• 13 Yu B, Han K, Zhan C, Zhang C, Ma H, Su J. Fibular head osteotomy: a new approach for the treatment of lateral or posterolateral tibial plateau fractures. Knee 2010; 17 (5) 313-318
• 14 Solomon LB, Stevenson AW, Lee YC, Baird RPV, Howie DW. Posterolateral and anterolateral approaches to unicondylar posterolateral tibial plateau fractures: a comparative study. Injury 2013; 44 (11) 1561-1568
• 15 Tscherne H, Lobenhoffer P. Tibial plateau fractures. Management and expected results. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1993; (292) 87-100
• 16 Berber R, Lewis CP, Copas D, Forward DP, Moran CG. Postero-medial approach for complex tibial plateau injuries with a postero-medial or postero-lateral shear fragment. Injury 2014; 45 (4) 757-765
• 17 Cass JR, Wolff L, Torchia M. Tibia and fibula. In: Morrey BF, Morrey MC. Master techniques in orthopaedic surgery: Relevant surgical exposures. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams and Williams; 2002: 215-232
• 18 Beltran MJ, Blair JA, Huh J, Kirby JM, Hsu JR ; Skeletal Trauma Research Consortium(STReC). Articular exposure with the swashbuckler versus a “Mini-swashbuckler” approach. Injury 2013; 44 (2) 189-193
• 19 Huh J, Krueger CA, Medvecky MJ, Hsu JR ; Skeletal Trauma Research Consortium. Medial elbow exposure for coronoid fractures: FCU-split versus over-the-top. J Orthop Trauma 2013; 27 (12) 730-734
• 20 Blair JA, Stinner DJ, Kirby JM, Gerlinger TL, Hsu JR ; Skeletal Trauma Research Consortium (STReC). Quantification of femoral neck exposure through a minimally invasive Smith-Petersen approach. J Orthop Trauma 2010; 24 (6) 355-358