Download PDF
Semin Musculoskelet Radiol 2017; 21(05): 518-528
DOI: 10.1055/s-0037-1606141
Review Article
Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

Update on Femoroacetabular Impingement: What Is New, and How Should We Assess It?

Reto Sutter
1   Department of Radiology, Orthopedic University Hospital Balgrist, Zurich, Switzerland
2   Faculty of Medicine, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
,
Christian W. A. Pfirrmann
1   Department of Radiology, Orthopedic University Hospital Balgrist, Zurich, Switzerland
2   Faculty of Medicine, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
12 October 2017 (online)

Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

It is almost 20 years since the concept of femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) was introduced, and by now a large number of orthopaedic surgeons, sports physicians, and radiologists have implemented this concept in clinical practice, as is evident in the steady rise in the number of patients diagnosed and treated for FAI. However, this trend has been accompanied by some criticism and concerns about overdiagnosing FAI. Imaging continues to play a crucial part in the evaluation of patients with suspected FAI. This review looks at the current state of FAI: Which parts of the FAI concept have become widely accepted, which ideas have been abandoned, and how should we assess patients with suspected FAI today? Although cam- and pincer-type morphology remain two central pillars of the FAI concept, the important role of abnormal femoral torsion in the development of FAI has now been recognized. High-level sports activities during skeletal maturation have been proven to increase the risk of developing FAI.

Keywords

femoroacetabular impingement - cam - pincer - femoral torsion
 

  • References

  • 1 Hackenbroch MH. Intertrochanteric osteotomy for the treatment of coxarthrosis. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 1989; 108 (03) 125-131
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 2 Leunig M, Ganz R. The evolution and concepts of joint-preserving surgery of the hip. Bone Joint J 2014; 96-B (01) 5-18
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 3 Ganz R, Gill TJ, Gautier E, Ganz K, Krügel N, Berlemann U. Surgical dislocation of the adult hip a technique with full access to the femoral head and acetabulum without the risk of avascular necrosis. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2001; 83 (08) 1119-1124
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 4 Ganz R, Parvizi J, Beck M, Leunig M, Nötzli H, Siebenrock KA. Femoroacetabular impingement: a cause for osteoarthritis of the hip. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2003; (417) 112-120
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 5 Gautier E, Ganz K, Krügel N, Gill T, Ganz R. Anatomy of the medial femoral circumflex artery and its surgical implications. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2000; 82 (05) 679-683
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 6 Pfirrmann CW, Duc SR, Zanetti M, Dora C, Hodler J. MR arthrography of acetabular cartilage delamination in femoroacetabular cam impingement. Radiology 2008; 249 (01) 236-241
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 7 Kim YT, Azuma H. The nerve endings of the acetabular labrum. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1995; (320) 176-181
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 8 Corten K, Ganz R, Chosa E, Leunig M. Bone apposition of the acetabular rim in deep hips: a distinct finding of global pincer impingement. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2011; 93 (Suppl. 02) 10-16
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 9 Pfirrmann CW, Mengiardi B, Dora C, Kalberer F, Zanetti M, Hodler J. Cam and pincer femoroacetabular impingement: characteristic MR arthrographic findings in 50 patients. Radiology 2006; 240 (03) 778-785
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 10 Clohisy JC, Knaus ER, Hunt DM, Lesher JM, Harris-Hayes M, Prather H. Clinical presentation of patients with symptomatic anterior hip impingement. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2009; 467 (03) 638-644
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 11 Brunner R, Maffiuletti NA, Cavatelli NC. , et al. Prevalence and functional consequences of femoroacetabular impingement in young male ice hockey players. Am J Sports Med 2016; 44 (01) 46-53
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 12 Palmer WE. Femoroacetabular impingement: caution is warranted in making imaging-based assumptions and diagnoses. Radiology 2010; 257 (01) 4-7
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 13 Rubin DA. Femoroacetabular impingement: fact, fiction, or fantasy?. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2013; 201 (03) 526-534
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 14 Reichenbach S, Jüni P, Werlen S. , et al. Prevalence of cam-type deformity on hip magnetic resonance imaging in young males: a cross-sectional study. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 2010; 62 (09) 1319-1327
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 15 Sutter R, Dietrich TJ, Zingg PO, Pfirrmann CW. How useful is the alpha angle for discriminating between symptomatic patients with cam-type femoroacetabular impingement and asymptomatic volunteers?. Radiology 2012; 264 (02) 514-521
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 16 Nötzli HP, Wyss TF, Stoecklin CH, Schmid MR, Treiber K, Hodler J. The contour of the femoral head-neck junction as a predictor for the risk of anterior impingement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2002; 84 (04) 556-560
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 17 Lohan DG, Seeger LL, Motamedi K, Hame S, Sayre J. Cam-type femoral-acetabular impingement: is the alpha angle the best MR arthrography has to offer?. Skeletal Radiol 2009; 38 (09) 855-862
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 18 Omoumi P, Thiery C, Michoux N, Malghem J, Lecouvet FE, Vande Berg BC. Anatomic features associated with femoroacetabular impingement are equally common in hips of old and young asymptomatic individuals without CT signs of osteoarthritis. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2014; 202 (05) 1078-1086
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 19 Bouma H, Slot NJ, Toogood P, Pollard T, van Kampen P, Hogervorst T. Where is the neck? Alpha angle measurement revisited. Acta Orthop 2014; 85 (02) 147-151
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 20 Saito M, Tsukada S, Yoshida K, Okada Y, Tasaki A. Correlation of alpha angle between various radiographic projections and radial magnetic resonance imaging for cam deformity in femoral head-neck junction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2017; 25 (01) 77-83
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 21 Nouh MR, Schweitzer ME, Rybak L, Cohen J. Femoroacetabular impingement: can the alpha angle be estimated?. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2008; 190 (05) 1260-1262
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 22 Mascarenhas VV, Rego P, Dantas P, Gaspar A, Soldado F, Consciência JG. Cam deformity and the omega angle, a novel quantitative measurement of femoral head-neck morphology: a 3D CT gender analysis in asymptomatic subjects. Eur Radiol 2017; 27 (05) 2011-2023
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 23 Agricola R, Waarsing JH, Thomas GE. , et al. Cam impingement: defining the presence of a cam deformity by the alpha angle: data from the CHECK cohort and Chingford cohort. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2014; 22 (02) 218-225
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 24 Ito K, Minka II MA, Leunig M, Werlen S, Ganz R. Femoroacetabular impingement and the cam-effect. A MRI-based quantitative anatomical study of the femoral head-neck offset. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2001; 83 (02) 171-176
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 25 Ehrmann C, Rosskopf AB, Pfirrmann CW, Sutter R. Beyond the alpha angle: alternative measurements for quantifying cam-type deformities in femoroacetabular impingement. J Magn Reson Imaging 2015; 42 (04) 1024-1031
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 26 Kang AC, Gooding AJ, Coates MH, Goh TD, Armour P, Rietveld J. Computed tomography assessment of hip joints in asymptomatic individuals in relation to femoroacetabular impingement. Am J Sports Med 2010; 38 (06) 1160-1165
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 27 Agten CA, Sutter R, Buck FM, Pfirrmann CW. Hip imaging in athletes: sports imaging series. Radiology 2016; 280 (02) 351-369
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 28 Nepple JJ, Riggs CN, Ross JR, Clohisy JC. Clinical presentation and disease characteristics of femoroacetabular impingement are sex-dependent. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2014; 96 (20) 1683-1689
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 29 Siebenrock KA, Kalbermatten DF, Ganz R. Effect of pelvic tilt on acetabular retroversion: a study of pelves from cadavers. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2003; (407) 241-248
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 30 Tannast M, Zheng G, Anderegg C. , et al. Tilt and rotation correction of acetabular version on pelvic radiographs. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2005; 438 (438) 182-190
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 31 Ruelle M, Dubois JL. The protrusive malformation and its arthrosic complication. I. Radiological and clinical symptoms. Etiopathogenesis [in French]. Rev Rhum Mal Osteoartic 1962; 29: 476-489
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 32 Werner CM, Copeland CE, Stromberg J, Ruckstuhl T. Correlation of the cross-over ratio of the cross-over sign on conventional pelvic radiographs with computed tomography retroversion measurements. Skeletal Radiol 2010; 39 (07) 655-660
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 33 Tannast M, Hanke MS, Zheng G, Steppacher SD, Siebenrock KA. What are the radiographic reference values for acetabular under- and overcoverage?. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2015; 473 (04) 1234-1246
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 34 Larson CM, Moreau-Gaudry A, Kelly BT. , et al. Are normal hips being labeled as pathologic? A CT-based method for defining normal acetabular coverage. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2015; 473 (04) 1247-1254
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 35 Sutter R, Dietrich TJ, Zingg PO, Pfirrmann CW. Femoral antetorsion: comparing asymptomatic volunteers and patients with femoroacetabular impingement. Radiology 2012; 263 (02) 475-483
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 36 Tibor LM, Liebert G, Sutter R, Impellizzeri FM, Leunig M. Two or more impingement and/or instability deformities are often present in patients with hip pain. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2013; 471 (12) 3762-3773
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 37 Lerch TD, Todorski IA, Schmaranzer F. , et al. More than half of the patients with hip pain due to FAI present an abnormal femoral torsion [ECR online, B-1165]. Insights Imaging 2017; 8 (Suppl. 01)
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 38 Sutter R, Dietrich TJ, Zingg PO, Pfirrmann CW. Assessment of femoral antetorsion with MRI: comparison of oblique measurements to standard transverse measurements. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2015; 205 (01) 130-135
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 39 Femoral antetorsion converter. Available at: http://www.antetorsion.org . Accessed April 10, 2017
    PubMed
  • 40 Kim HY, Lee SK, Lee NK, Choy WS. An anatomical measurement of medial femoral torsion. J Pediatr Orthop B 2012; 21 (06) 552-557
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 41 Georgiadis AG, Siegal DS, Scher CE, Zaltz I. Can femoral rotation be localized and quantified using standard CT measures?. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2015; 473 (04) 1309-1314
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 42 Vallon F, Reymond A, Fürnstahl P. , et al. Effect of angular deformities of the proximal femur on impingement-free hip range of motion in a three-dimensional rigid body model. Hip Int 2015; 25 (06) 574-580
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 43 Bardakos NV, Villar RN. Predictors of progression of osteoarthritis in femoroacetabular impingement: a radiological study with a minimum of ten years follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2009; 91 (02) 162-169
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 44 Ranawat AS, Schulz B, Baumbach SF, Meftah M, Ganz R, Leunig M. Radiographic predictors of hip pain in femoroacetabular impingement. HSS J 2011; 7 (02) 115-119
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 45 Sutter R, Pfirrmann CWA. Atypical hip impingement. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2013; 201 (03) W437-W442
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 46 Ross JR, Nepple JJ, Philippon MJ, Kelly BT, Larson CM, Bedi A. Effect of changes in pelvic tilt on range of motion to impingement and radiographic parameters of acetabular morphologic characteristics. Am J Sports Med 2014; 42 (10) 2402-2409
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 47 Hunt D, Prather H, Harris Hayes M, Clohisy JC. Clinical outcomes analysis of conservative and surgical treatment of patients with clinical indications of prearthritic, intra-articular hip disorders. PM R 2012; 4 (07) 479-487
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 48 Pollard TC. A perspective on femoroacetabular impingement. Skeletal Radiol 2011; 40 (07) 815-818
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 49 Wright AA, Hegedus EJ, Taylor JB, Dischiavi SL, Stubbs AJ. Non-operative management of femoroacetabular impingement: a prospective, randomized controlled clinical trial pilot study. J Sci Med Sport 2016; 19 (09) 716-721
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 50 Griffin DR, Dickenson EJ, O'Donnell J. , et al. The Warwick Agreement on femoroacetabular impingement syndrome (FAI syndrome): an international consensus statement. Br J Sports Med 2016; 50 (19) 1169-1176
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 51 Köhnlein W, Ganz R, Impellizzeri FM, Leunig M. Acetabular morphology: implications for joint-preserving surgery. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2009; 467 (03) 682-691
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 52 Gebhart JJ, Streit JJ, Bedi A, Bush-Joseph CA, Nho SJ, Salata MJ. Correlation of pelvic incidence with cam and pincer lesions. Am J Sports Med 2014; 42 (11) 2649-2653
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 53 Agten CA, Jonczy M, Ullrich O, Pfirrmann CWA, Sutter R, Buck FM. Measurement of acetabular version based on biplanar radiographs with 3D reconstructions in comparison to CT as reference standard in cadavers. Clin Anat 2017; 30 (05) 591-598
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 54 Audenaert EA, Peeters I, Vigneron L, Baelde N, Pattyn C. Hip morphological characteristics and range of internal rotation in femoroacetabular impingement. Am J Sports Med 2012; 40 (06) 1329-1336
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 55 Bouma HW, Hogervorst T, Audenaert E, Krekel P, van Kampen PM. Can combining femoral and acetabular morphology parameters improve the characterization of femoroacetabular impingement?. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2015; 473 (04) 1396-1403
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 56 Hack K, Di Primio G, Rakhra K, Beaulé PE. Prevalence of cam-type femoroacetabular impingement morphology in asymptomatic volunteers. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2010; 92 (14) 2436-2444
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 57 Hartofilakidis G, Bardakos NV, Babis GC, Georgiades G. An examination of the association between different morphotypes of femoroacetabular impingement in asymptomatic subjects and the development of osteoarthritis of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2011; 93 (05) 580-586
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 58 Nepple JJ, Vigdorchik JM, Clohisy JC. What is the association between sports participation and the development of proximal femoral cam deformity? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Sports Med 2015; 43 (11) 2833-2840
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 59 Agricola R, Heijboer MP, Ginai AZ. , et al. A cam deformity is gradually acquired during skeletal maturation in adolescent and young male soccer players: a prospective study with minimum 2-year follow-up. Am J Sports Med 2014; 42 (04) 798-806
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 60 Duthon VB, Charbonnier C, Kolo FC. , et al. Correlation of clinical and magnetic resonance imaging findings in hips of elite female ballet dancers. Arthroscopy 2013; 29 (03) 411-419
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 61 Kang C, Hwang DS, Cha SM. Acetabular labral tears in patients with sports injury. Clin Orthop Surg 2009; 1 (04) 230-235
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 62 Kolo FC, Charbonnier C, Pfirrmann CW. , et al. Extreme hip motion in professional ballet dancers: dynamic and morphological evaluation based on magnetic resonance imaging. Skeletal Radiol 2013; 42 (05) 689-698
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 63 Ganz R, Leunig M, Leunig-Ganz K, Harris WH. The etiology of osteoarthritis of the hip: an integrated mechanical concept. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2008; 466 (02) 264-272
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 64 Tannast M, Siebenrock KA, Anderson SE. Femoroacetabular impingement: radiographic diagnosis—what the radiologist should know. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2007; 188 (06) 1540-1552
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 65 Reichenbach S, Leunig M, Werlen S. , et al. Association between cam-type deformities and magnetic resonance imaging-detected structural hip damage: a cross-sectional study in young men. Arthritis Rheum 2011; 63 (12) 4023-4030
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 66 Leunig M, Jüni P, Werlen S. , et al. Prevalence of cam and pincer-type deformities on hip MRI in an asymptomatic young Swiss female population: a cross-sectional study. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2013; 21 (04) 544-550
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 67 Matsuda DK. Acute iatrogenic dislocation following hip impingement arthroscopic surgery. Arthroscopy 2009; 25 (04) 400-404
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 68 Suter A, Dietrich TJ, Maier M, Dora C, Pfirrmann CW. MR findings associated with positive distraction of the hip joint achieved by axial traction. Skeletal Radiol 2015; 44 (06) 787-795
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 69 Naal FD, Müller A, Varghese VD, Wellauer V, Impellizzeri FM, Leunig M. Outcome of hip impingement surgery: does generalized joint hypermobility matter?. Am J Sports Med 2017; 45 (06) 1309-1314
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 70 Steppacher SD, Anwander H, Zurmühle CA, Tannast M, Siebenrock KA. Eighty percent of patients with surgical hip dislocation for femoroacetabular impingement have a good clinical result without osteoarthritis progression at 10 years. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2015; 473 (04) 1333-1341
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 71 Investigators F. ; FIRST Investigators. A multi-centre randomized controlled trial comparing arthroscopic osteochondroplasty and lavage with arthroscopic lavage alone on patient important outcomes and quality of life in the treatment of young adult (18-50) femoroacetabular impingement. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2015; 16: 64
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 72 Sutter R, Zubler V, Hoffmann A. , et al. Hip MRI: how useful is intraarticular contrast material for evaluating surgically proven lesions of the labrum and articular cartilage?. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2014; 202 (01) 160-169
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar