CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · J Neurol Surg Rep 2017; 78(03): e109-e112
DOI: 10.1055/s-0037-1606315
Case Report
Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Delayed Brain Edema and Swelling following Craniectomy for Evacuation of an Epidural Abscess that Improved by Cranioplasty: Case Report

Narushi Sugii
1   Department of Neurosurgery, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan
,
Masahide Matsuda
1   Department of Neurosurgery, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan
,
Tomokazu Sekine
1   Department of Neurosurgery, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan
,
Hideaki Matsumura
1   Department of Neurosurgery, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan
,
Tetsuya Yamamoto
1   Department of Neurosurgery, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan
,
Akira Matsumura
1   Department of Neurosurgery, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

10 January 2017

05 June 2017

Publication Date:
28 August 2017 (online)

Abstract

We report a unique case of delayed brain swelling following craniectomy that improved rapidly after cranioplasty, and discuss the potential mechanism underlying this delayed and reversible brain swelling. A 22-year-old woman developed surgical site infection after removal of a convexity meningioma. Magnetic resonance imaging revealed an epidural abscess around the surgical site. Subsequently, the abscess was evacuated, and the bone flap was removed. Later, brain edema around the skull defect emerged and progressed gradually, despite resolution of the infection. The edematous brain developed focal swelling outward through the bone defect without ventricle dilatation. Because we suspected that the edema and swelling were caused by the state of the bone defect, we performed a cranioplasty 10 weeks after the bone flap removal, and brain edema improved rapidly. We hypothesized that the brain edema was initially caused by surgical stress and inflammation, followed by compression of cortical veins between the dural edge and brain tissue, leading to disruption of venous return and exacerbation of brain edema. When delayed focal brain edema and external swelling progress gradually after bone flap removal, after excluding other pathological conditions, cranioplasty should be considered to improve cortical venous congestion caused by postsurgical adhesion.

 
  • References

  • 1 Kurland DB, Khaladj-Ghom A, Stokum JA. , et al. Complications associated with decompressive craniectomy: a systematic review. Neurocrit Care 2015; 23 (02) 292-304 . Doi: 10.1007/s12028-015-0144-7
  • 2 Sakamoto S, Eguchi K, Kiura Y, Arita K, Kurisu K. CT perfusion imaging in the syndrome of the sinking skin flap before and after cranioplasty. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 2006; 108 (06) 583-585 . Doi: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2005.03.012
  • 3 Ding J, Guo Y, Tian H. The influence of decompressive craniectomy on the development of hydrocephalus: a review. Arq Neuropsiquiatr 2014; 72 (09) 715-720
  • 4 Takeuchi S, Takasato Y, Masaoka H. , et al. Hydrocephalus after decompressive craniectomy for hemispheric cerebral infarction. J Clin Neurosci 2013; 20 (03) 377-382
  • 5 Honeybul S, Ho KM. Decompressive craniectomy--a narrative review and discussion. Aust Crit Care 2014; 27 (02) 85-91 . Doi: 10.1016/j.aucc.2013.06.001
  • 6 Yang XF, Wen L, Shen F. , et al. Surgical complications secondary to decompressive craniectomy in patients with a head injury: a series of 108 consecutive cases. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2008; 150 (12) 1241-1247, discussion 1248 . Doi: 10.1007/s00701-008-0145-9
  • 7 Michinaga S, Koyama Y. Pathogenesis of brain edema and investigation into anti-edema drugs. Int J Mol Sci 2015; 16 (05) 9949-9975 . Doi: 10.3390/ijms16059949
  • 8 Sherchan P, Kim CH, Zhang JH. Surgical brain injury and edema prevention. Acta Neurochir Suppl (Wien) 2013; 118: 129-133 . Doi: 10.1007/978-3-7091-1434-6_23
  • 9 Cooper PR, Hagler H, Clark WK, Barnett P. Enhancement of experimental cerebral edema after decompressive craniectomy: implications for the management of severe head injuries. Neurosurgery 1979; 4 (04) 296-300
  • 10 Fung C, Murek M, Klinger-Gratz PP. , et al. Effect of decompressive craniectomy on perihematomal edema in patients with intracerebral hemorrhage. PLoS One 2016; 11 (02) e0149169 . Doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0149169
  • 11 Csókay A, Pataki G, Nagy L, Belán K. Vascular tunnel construction in the treatment of severe brain swelling caused by trauma and SAH. (evidence based on intra-operative blood flow measure). Neurol Res 2002; 24 (02) 157-160 . Doi: 10.1179/016164102101199701
  • 12 Gonzalez-Lopez P, Harput MV, Türe H, Atalay B, Türe U. Efficacy of placing a thin layer of gelatin sponge over the subdural space during dural closure in preventing meningo-cerebral adhesion. World Neurosurg 2015; 83 (01) 93-101 . Doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2014.02.032
  • 13 Vakis A, Koutentakis D, Karabetsos D, Kalostos G. Use of polytetrafluoroethylene dural substitute as adhesion preventive material during craniectomies. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 2006; 108 (08) 798-802 . Doi: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2005.11.026
  • 14 Kshettry VR, Hardy S, Weil RJ, Angelov L, Barnett GH. Immediate titanium cranioplasty after debridement and craniectomy for postcraniotomy surgical site infection. Neurosurgery 2012; 70 (1, Suppl Operative): 8-14, discussion 14–15 . Doi: 10.1227/NEU.0b013e31822fef2c
  • 15 Pierson M, Birinyi PV, Bhimireddy S, Coppens JR. Analysis of decompressive craniectomies with subsequent cranioplasties in the presence of collagen matrix dural substitute and polytetrafluoroethylene as an adhesion preventative material. World Neurosurg 2016; 86: 153-160 . Doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2015.09.078
  • 16 Wind JJ, Ohaegbulam C, Iwamoto FM, Black PM, Park JK. Immediate titanium mesh cranioplasty for treatment of postcraniotomy infections. World Neurosurg 2013; 79 (01) 207.e11-207.e13