Download PDF
Thromb Haemost 1999; 81(03): 353-357
DOI: 10.1055/s-0037-1614476
Review Article
Schattauer GmbH

Clinical Prediction of Deep Vein Thrombosis in Patients with Leg Symptoms

Susan R. Kahn
1   From the Center for Clinical Epidemiology and Community Studies and Department of Medicine, Sir Mortimer B. Davis-Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, Canada
,
Lawrence Joseph
2   Division of Clinical Epidemiology, Montreal General Hospital, Montreal, Canada
,
Lucien Abenhaim
1   From the Center for Clinical Epidemiology and Community Studies and Department of Medicine, Sir Mortimer B. Davis-Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, Canada
,
Jacques R. Leclerc
3   Division of Hematology, Montreal General Hospital, McGill University, Montreal, Canada
› Author AffiliationsThis work was supported by grants from the Fonds de la Recherche en Santé du Québec (training bursary, Dr. S. R. Kahn) and the National Health Research and Development Program, Canada.
Further Information

Publication History

Received04 June 1998

Accepted after revision18 November 1998

Publication Date:
09 December 2017 (online)

Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints

Summary

Symptoms and clinical signs individually are inaccurate for the diagnosis of DVT. However, when assessing patients with leg symptoms, clinicians have access to additional information, such as whether or not DVT risk factors are present that could improve the accuracy of clinical judgment. The purpose of this study was to identify which clinical variables best predict DVT, and to use these variables to create a clinical prediction index for DVT. We studied 271 university hospital patients with a first episode of symptomatic, clinically suspected DVT. The prevalence of DVT was 27%, of which 71% were proximal. At baseline, information was collected on demographic features, comorbidity, and symptoms and signs. A Bayesian model selection strategy was used to estimate the logistic regression model that best predicted DVT. Male sex [OR = 2.8 (1.5, 5.1)], orthopedic surgery [OR = 5.4 (2.2, 13.6)], warmth [OR = 2.1 (1.2, 3.9)] and superficial venous dilation on exam [OR = 2.9 (1.4, 5.7)] were independent predictors of DVT. Using the model, a clinical prediction index that categorized patients into different levels of DVT risk was created, and was useful in a theoretical strategy aimed to limit the need for contrast venography in patients with suspected DVT, such that 96% of study patients could have avoided contrast venography. This index should be evaluated prospectively in other patient populations.

 

  • References

  • 1 Haeger K. Problems of acute deep venous thrombosis. I. The interpretation of signs and symptoms. Angiology 1969; 20: 219-3.
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 2 Cranley JJ, Canos AJ, Sull WJ. The diagnosis of deep venous thrombosis. Fallibility of clinical symptoms and signs. Arch Surg 1976; 111: 34-6.
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 3 Hull R, Hirsh J, Sackett DL, Stoddart G. Cost effectiveness of clinical diagnosis, venography, and noninvasive testing in patients with symptomatic deep-vein thrombosis. N Engl J Med 1981; 304: 1561-7.
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 4 Heijboer H, Buller HR, Lensing AWA, Turpie AGG, Colly LP, ten Cate JW. A comparison of real-time compression ultrasonography with impedance plethysmography for the diagnosis of deep-vein thrombosis in symptomatic outpatients. N Engl J Med 1993; 329: 1365-9.
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 5 Ginsberg JS, Wells PS, Hirsh J, Panju AA, Patel MA, Malone DE, McGinnis J, Stevens P, Brill-Edwards P. Reevaluation of the sensitivity of impedance plethysmography for the detection of proximal deep vein thrombosis. Arch Intern Med 1994; 154: 1930-3.
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 6 Wasson JH, Sox HC, Neff RK, Goldman L. Clinical prediction rules. Applications and methodological standards. N Engl J Med 1985; 313: 793-9.
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 7 Laupacis A, Sekar N, Stiell IG. Clinical prediction rules. A review and suggested modifications of methodological standards. JAMA 1997; 277: 488-494.
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 8 Tversky A, Kahneman D. Judgment under uncertainty: heuristics and biases. Science 1974; 185: 1124-31.
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 9 Kahn SR, Leclerc J, Grover S, Joseph L, Coupal L, Wang S, Paltiel O, Baranyai St. M, Jacques B, Finkenbine S, Illescas F. A randomized management study of impedance plethysmography compared to contrast venography in patients with a first episode of clinically suspected deep vein thrombosis. Blood 1998; 92 (Supplement): Abstract #186.
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 10 Rabinov K, Paulin S. Roentgen diagnosis of venous thrombosis in the leg. Arch Surg 1972; 104: 134-44.
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 11 Hull R, van Aken WG, Hirsh J, Gallus AS, Hoicka G, Turpie AGG, Walker I, Gent M. Impedance plethysmography using the occlusive cuff technique in the diagnosis of venous thrombosis. Circulation 1976; 53: 696-700.
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 12 Kass RE, Raftery AE. Bayes Factors. J Am Stat Assoc 1995; 90 (430) 773-95.
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 13 S-plus version 3.3, Statsci, Seattle Washington.
    PubMed
  • 14 Wheeler HB, Hirsh J, Wells P, Anderson Jr. FA. Diagnostic tests for deep vein thrombosis. Clinical usefulness depends on probability of disease. Arch Intern Med 1994; 154: 1921-8.
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 15 Wells PS, Anderson DR, Bormanis J, Guy F, Mitchell M, Gray L, Clement C, Robinson KS, Lewandowski B. Value of assessment of pretest probability of deep-vein thrombosis in clinical management. Lancet 1997; 350: 1795-8.
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 16 Wells PS, Hirsh J, Anderson DR, Lensing AWA, Foster G, Kearon C, Weitz J, d’Ovidio R, Cogo A, Prandoni P, Girolami A, Ginsberg J. Accuracy of clinical assessment of deep-vein thrombosis. Lancet 1995; 345: 1326-30.
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 17 Clagett GP, Anderson Jr. FA, Heit J, Levine M, Wheeler HB. Prevention of venous thromboembolism. Chest 1995; 108: 312S-34S.
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 18 Anderson FA, Wheeler HB, Goldberg RJ, Hosmer DW, Patwardhan NA, Jovanovic B, Forcier A, Dalen JE. A population-based perspective of the hospital incidence and case-fatality rates of deep-vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism. The Worcester DVT study. Arch Intern Med 1991; 151: 933-8.
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 19 Nordstrom M, Lindblad B, Bergqvist D, Kjellstrom T. A prospective study of the incidence of deep-vein thrombosis within a defined urban population. J Intern Med 1992; 232: 155-60.
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 20 Coon WW, Willis PW, Keller JB. Venous thromboembolism and other venous diseases in the Tecumseh Community Health Study. Circulation 1973; 48: 839-46.
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 21 van der Waals FW. Differences in leading causes of death, hospitalization and general practice visits among Dutch women and men. Women & Health 1991; 17 (03) 101-23.
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 22 Briscoe ME. Why do people go to the doctor? Sex differences in the correlates of GP consultation. Soc Sci & Med 1987; 25 (05) 507-13.
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 23 Landefeld CS, McGuire E, Cohen AM. Clinical findings associated with acute proximal deep vein thrombosis: a basis for quantifying clinical judgment. Am J Med 1990; 88: 382-8.
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar