Download PDF
Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 1995; 08(01): 6-13
DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1631875
Review Article
Schattauer GmbH

Enhancing External Skeletal Fixation Pin Performance: Consideration of the Pin-Bone Interface

E. M. Clary
1   From the Department of Companion Animals and Special Species, College of Veterinary Medicine, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, USA
,
S. C. Roe
1   From the Department of Companion Animals and Special Species, College of Veterinary Medicine, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, USA
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Received for publication 17 August 1994

Publication Date:
09 February 2018 (online)

Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints

Summary

The integrity of an external skeletal fixator relies heavily on the pin-bone interface (PBI). Investigation of this interface have focused on histological, mechanical, thermal and clinical assessments. In this review the factors which are important for optimizing the strength and longevity of the PBI are presented. Pin design, pin insertion technique, bone quality and tissue response are considered.

External skeletal fixation is used increasingly in human and veterinary orthopaedics. Pin loosening and infection are the primary causes of device failure and patient morbidity. Using several different techniques, researchers have identified a number of factors which affect the integrity of the pin-bone interface. These include pin design, pin insertion technique, initial bone quality and the osseous response to pin implantation and loading.

Keywords

Pin-bone interface - external skeletal fixation - fixation pin performance
 

  • REFERENCES

  • 1 Aron DN, Toombs JP, Hollingsworth SC. Primary treatment of severe fractures by external skeletal fixation: Threaded pins compared with smooth pins. J Am Anim Hosp Assoc 1986; 22: 659-70.
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 2 Egger EL, Histand MB, Powers BE. Effect of fixation pin insertion on the bonepin interface. Vet Surg 1986; 15 (03) 246-52.
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 3 Billouris TL, Schneider E, Rahn BA, Gasser B, Perren SM. The effect of radial preload on the implantbone interface: A cadaveric study. J Orthop Trauma 1989; 3 (04) 323-32.
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 4 Halsey D, Fleming B, Pope MH, Krag M, Kristiansen T. External fixator pin design. Clin Orthop 1992; 278: 305-12.
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 5 Ng A, Finlay JB. The pinbone interface under a polarized light microscope. In: Proc Comp Orthop Res Soc USA, Japan, and Canada. 1991: 215
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 6 Anderson MA, Mann FA, Wagner-Mann C. et al A comparison of nonthreaded enhanced threaded, and Ellis fixation pins used in type 1 external skeletal fixators in dogs. Vet Surg 1993; 22 (06) 482-9.
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 7 Palmer RH, Hulse DA, Hyman WA, Palmer DR. Principles of bone healing and biomechanics of external skeletal fixation. Vet Clin North Am (Small Anim Pract) 1992; 22 (01) 45-68.
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 8 Toombs JP. Principles of external skeletal fixation using the Kirschner-Ehmer splint. Sem Vet Clin North Am 1991; 6 (01) 68-74.
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 9 Egger EL. Instrumentation for external fixation. Vet Clin North Am (Small Anim Pract) 1992; 22 (01) 19-13.
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 10 Roe SC. Classification and nomenclature of external fixators. Vet Clin North Am (Small Anim Pract) 1992; 22 (01) 11-8.
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 11 Van Ee RT, Geasling JW. The principles of external skeletal fixation. Vet Med 1992; 87 (04) 334-3.
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 12 Burr DB, Stafford T. Validity of the bulkstaining technique to separate artifactual from in vivobone microdamage. Clin Orthop 1990; 260: 305-8.
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 13 Holshaw SJ, Schaffler MB, Fyhrie DP. Effect of thread design on microdamage creation in cortical bone. In: Proc of the 40th Orthop Res Soc. 1994: 537
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 14 Andrianne Y, Wagenknecht M, Donderwolcke M. et al External fixation pin: An in vitrogeneral investigation. Orthopedics 1987; 10 (11) 1507-16.
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 15 Wikenheiser MA, Lewallen DG, Markel MD. In vitromechanical, thermal, and microstructural performance of five external fixation pins. In: Proc of the 38th Orthop Res Soc. 1992: 409
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 16 Hurtig M, Rorabeck CH, Ng A, Finlay JB. Pilot hole size and radial compression affect pin-bone interface quality in dynamicallyloaded external fixator pins. In: Proc of the 39th Orthop Res Soc. 1993: 110
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 17 Hyldahl C, Pearson S, Tepic S, Perren SM. Induction and prevention of pin loosening in external fixation: An in vivo study on sheep tibiae. J Orthop Trauma 1991; 5 (04) 485-92.
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 18 Pettine KA, Chao EYS, Kelly PJ. Analysis of the external fixator pinbone interface. Clin Orthop 1993; 293: 18-27.
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 19 Evans M, Spencer M, Wang Q. et al Design and testing of external fixator bone screws. J Biomed Eng 1990; 12: 457-62.
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 20 Manley MT, Hurst L, Hindes R. et al Effects of lowmodulus coatings on pinbone contact stresses in external fixation. J Orthop Res 1984; 2 (04) 385-92.
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 21 Dernell WS, Harari J, Blackketter DM. A comparison of acute pullout strength between twoway and one-way transfixation pin insertion for external skeletal fixation in canine bone. Vet Surg 1993; 22 (02) 110-4.
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 22 Schatzker J, Sanderson R, Murnaghan JP. The holding power of orthopedic screws in vivo. Clin Orthop 1975; 108: 115-26.
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 23 Bennet RA, Egger EL, Histand M, Ellis AB. Comparison of the strength and holding power of 4-pin designs for use with half pin (type 1) external skeletal fixation. Vet Surg 1987; 16 (03) 207-11.
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 24 Seitz WH, Froimson AI, Brooks DB. et al External fixator pin insertion techniques: Biomechanical analysis and clinical relevance. J Hand Surg 1991; 16 A (03) 560-3.
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 25 Gumbs JM, Brinker WO, DeCamp CE. et al Comparison of acute and chronic pullout resistance of pins used with the external fixator (Kirschner splint). J Am Anim Hosp Assoc 1988; 24: 231-4.
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 26 Namba RS, Kabo JM, Meals RA. Biomechanical effects of point configuration in Kirschnerwire fixation. Clin Orthop 1987; 214: 19-22.
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 27 Polio FE, Hyman WA, Hulse DA. The role of the external bar in a 6-pin Type 1 external skeletal fixation device. V. C. O.T 1993; 6: 75-9.
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 28 Matthews LS, Hirsch C. Temperatures measured in human cortical bone when drilling. J Bone Joint Surg 1972; 54 A (02) 297-308.
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 29 Matthew LS, Green CA, Goldstein SA. The thermal effects of skeletal fixationpin insertion in bone. J Bone Joint Surg 1984; 66 A (07) 1077-83.
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 30 Mahan J, Seligson D, Henry SL. et al Factors in pin tract infections. Orthopedics 1991; 14 (03) 305-8.
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 31 Green SA. Complications of external skeletal fixation. Clin Orthop 1983; 180: 109-16.
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 32 Bynum DJ, Ledbetter WB, Boyd CL, Ray DR. Holding characteristics of fasteners in bone. Exp Mech 1971; 11: 363-9.
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 33 Kasman RA, Chao EYS. Fatigue performance of external fixator pins. J Orthop Res 1984; 2 (04) 377-84.
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 34 Krag MH, Beynnon BD, Pope MH. et al An internal fixator for posterior application to short segments of the thoracic, lumbar, or lumbosacral spine. Clin Orthop 1986; 203: 75-98.
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 35 Koranyi E, Bowman CE, Knecht CD, Janssen M. Holding power of orthopaedic screws in bone. Clin Orthop 1970; 72: 283
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 36 Markel MD, Sielman E. Radiographic study of homotypic variation of long bones in dogs. Am J Vet Res 1993; 54 (12) 2000-3.
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 37 Uhthoff HK, Germain JP. The reversal of tissue differentiation around screws. Clin Orthop 1976; 123: 248-52.
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 38 Schatzker J, Home JG, Sumner-Smith G. The effect of movement on the holding power of screws in bone. Clin Orthop 1975; 111: 257-62.
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 39 Ling RSM. Observations on the fixation of implants to the bony skeleton. Clin Orthop 1986; 210: 80-96.
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar