The use of the computed tomography in the diagnostic protocol of the elbow in the dog: 24 joints

Gian Luca Rovesti; Martina Biasibetti; Annette Schumacher; Michelle Fabiani

doi:10.1055/s-0038-1632711

Veterinary and Comparative Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Inhaltsverzeichnis

Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2002; 15(01): 35-43
DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1632711

Original Research

Schattauer GmbH

The use of the computed tomography in the diagnostic protocol of the elbow in the dog: 24 joints

Gian Luca Rovesti

¹Ambulatorio Veterinario Associato “M. E. Miller”, Cavriago (RE), Italy

,

Martina Biasibetti

¹Ambulatorio Veterinario Associato “M. E. Miller”, Cavriago (RE), Italy

,

Annette Schumacher

¹Ambulatorio Veterinario Associato “M. E. Miller”, Cavriago (RE), Italy

,

Michelle Fabiani

²Gulf Coast Veterinary Diagnostic Imaging, Houston, Texas, USA

› Institutsangaben

Abstract

Summary

The evaluation of the elbow joint is difficult based on clinical and radiographic examinations. The anatomical structures of its articular components are superimposed with standard radiography, often leading to presumptive diagnoses. When the radiographic findings become more suggestive, usually the early phase of the disease has passed and chronic disease has developed. Because computer-generated slices are not hindered by this superimposition, the use of computed tomography may be beneficial in investigating the joint. The purpose of this study was to evaluate if computed tomography could change or better define the diagnosis previously made on the basis of a radiographic examination in 12 client- owned dogs presented for elbow lameness. As a positive control, 12 out of the 24 imaged joints were surgically or arthroscopically explored. The diagnosis based on computed tomography was different or more precisely defined, compared to the radiographic examination, in 46% of the examined joints. Earlier and more complete definition of elbow joint disease may change the therapeutic options and, potentially, the clinical outcome.

Keywords

Dog - Elbow Joint - Computed Tomography

Volltext

Referenzen

References
1 Bennett D, Duff SRI, Kene RO, Lee R. Osteochondritis dissecans and fragmentation of the coronoid process in the elbow joint of the dog. Vet Rec 1981; 109: 329-36.
2 Boulav JP. Fragmented medial coronoid process of the ulna in the dog. Vet Clin North Am Small Anirn Pract 1998; 28: 51-74.
3 Braden TD, Stickle RL, Dejardin LM, Mostosky UV. The use of computed tomography in fragmented coronoid disease: a case report. Vet Comp Orthop Traum 1994; 07: 40-4.
4 Carpenter LG, Schwartz PD, Lowry JE, Park RD, Steyn PF. Comparison of radiologic imaging techniques for diagnosis of fragmented medial coronoid process of the cubital joint in dogs. J Am Vet Med Assoc 1993; 203: 78-83.
5 Fox SM, Roberts RE. Linear tomography in diagnosing fragmented coronoid processes in canine elbows. Comp Cont Educ Pract Vet 1987; 09: 60-5.
6 Grondalen J. Arthrosis with special reference to the elbow joint of young rapidly growing dogs. II. Occurrence. clinical and radiographical findings. Nord Vet Med 1979; 31: 69-75.
7 Grondalen J. Arthrosis in the elbow joint of young rapidly growing dogs. III. Ununited medial coronoid process of the ulna and osteochondritis dissecans of the humeral condyle. Surgical procedure for correction and postoperative investigation. Nord Vet Med 1979; 31: 520-7.
8 Grondalen J, Grondalen T. Arthrosis in the elbow joint of young rapidly growing dogs. V. A pathoanatomical investigation. Nord Vet Med 1981; 33: 1-16.
9 Grondalen J. Arthrosis in the elbow joint of young rapidly growing dogs. VI. Interrelation between clinical, radiographical and patho-anatomical findings. Nord Vet Med 1982; 34: 65-75.
10 Grondalen J. Arthrosis in the elbow of young rapidly growing dogs. VII. Occurrence in the Rottweiler breed. Nord Vet Med 1982; 34: 76-82.
11 Henry WB. Radiographic diagnosis and surgical management of fragmented medial coronoid process in dogs. J Am Vet Med Assoc 1984; 184: 799-805.
12 Keller GG, Kreeger JM, Mann FA, Lattimer JC. Correlation of radiographic, necropsy and histologic findings in 8 dogs with elbow dysplasia. Vet Radiol Ultrasound 1997; 38: 272-6.
13 Lewis DD, Parker RB, Hager DA. Fragmented medial coronoid process of the canine elbow. Comp Cont Educ Pract Vet. 1989 11. 703-15,734
14 Marcellin-Little DJ, DeYoung DJ, Ferris KK, Berry CM. Incomplete ossification of the humeral condyle in spaniels. Vet Sura 1994; 23: 475-87.
15 Olsson SE. The early diagnosis of fragmented coronoid process and osteochondritis dissecans of the canine elbow joint. J Am Anim Hosp Assoc 1983; 19: 616-26.
16 Read RA, Armstrong SJ, Black AP, Macpherson GC, Yovich JC, Davev T. Relationship between physical signs of elbow dysplasia and radiographic score in growing Rottweilers. J Am Vet Med Assoc 1996; 209: 1427-30.
17 Reiehle JK, Park RD, Bahr AM. Computed tomographic findings of dogs with cubital joint lameness. Vet Radiol and Ultrasound 2000; 41: 125-30.
18 Rovesti GL, Fluckiger M, Margini A, Marcellin-Little D. Fragmented coronoid process and incomplete ossification of the humeral condyle in a Rottweiler. Vet Surg 1998; 27: 354-7.
19 Snaps FR, Balligand MH, Saunders JH, Park RD, Dondelinger RF. Comparison of radiography, magnetic resonance imaging, and surgical findings in dogs with elbow dysplasia. Am J Vet Res 1997; 58: 1367-70.
20 Tirgari M. Clinical, radiographical and pathological aspects of ununited medial coronoid process of the elbow joint in dogs. J Small Anim Pract 1980; 21: 595-608.
21 Vaananen M, Skutnabb K. Elbow lameness in the young dog caused by a sesamoidal fragment. J Small Anim Pract 1978; 19: 363-71.
22 Van Bree H, van Ryssen B. Imaging the canine elbow: radiography, computed tomography and arthroscopy. Vet Ann 1995; 35: 118-29.
23 Van Ryssen B, van Bree H, Simoens P. Elbow arthroscopy in clinically normal dogs. Am J Vet Res 1993; 54: 191-8.
24 Van Ryssen B, van Bree H. Arthroscopic findings in 100 dogs with elbow lameness. Vet Rec 1997; 140: 360-2.
25 Voorhout G, Hazewinkel HAW. Radiographic evaluation of the canine elbow joint with special reference to the medial humeral condyle and the medial coronoid process. Vet Radiol 1987; 28: 158-65.
26 Wind AP. Elbow incongruity and developmental diseases in the dog: part I. J Am Anim Hosp Assoc 1986; 22: 711-24.
27 Wind AP. Elbow incongruity and developmental diseases in the dog: part II. J Am Anim Hosp Assoc 1986; 22: 725-30.
28 Wood AKW, McCarthy PH, Howlett CR. Anatomic and radiographic appearance of a sesamoid bone in the tendon of origin of the supinator muscle of dogs. Am J Vet Res 1985; 46: 2043-7.
29 Wosar MA, Lewis DD, Neuwirth L, Parker RB, Spencer CP, Kubilis PS, Stubbs WP, Murphy ST, Shiroma JT, Stallings JT, Bertrand SG. Radiographic evaluation of elbow joints before and after surgery in dogs with possible fragmented medial coronoid process. J Am Vet Med Assoc 1999; 214: 52-8.