Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2003; 16(01): 01-05
DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1632755
Clinical Communication
Schattauer GmbH

Frequency of post-traumatic osteoarthritis in dogs after repair of a humeral condylar fracture

W. J. Gordon
1   Department of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, Iowa State University College of Veterinary Medicine, Ames, IA, USA
,
M. F. Besancon
1   Department of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, Iowa State University College of Veterinary Medicine, Ames, IA, USA
,
M. G. Conzemius
1   Department of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, Iowa State University College of Veterinary Medicine, Ames, IA, USA
,
K. G. Miles
1   Department of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, Iowa State University College of Veterinary Medicine, Ames, IA, USA
,
A. S. Kapatkin
2   Department of Clinical Sciences, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
,
W. T. N. Culp
2   Department of Clinical Sciences, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
› Institutsangaben
Weitere Informationen

Publikationsverlauf

Received 25. April 2002

Accepted 11. September 2002

Publikationsdatum:
08. Februar 2018 (online)

Preview

Summary

The frequency of post-traumatic osteoarthritis (PTO) in the dog after repair of a humeral condylar fracture (HCF) and the relationship of fracture reduction to outcome is unknown. The objectives of this study were to determine the frequency of PTO in dogs after HCF repair and to determine the relationship between fracture reduction, limb function and follow-up osteoarthrosis (OA) score. All dogs were evaluated by physical and radiographic examinations and dogs with unilateral fracture repair were also examined by force platform gait analysis. Initial and follow-up radiographs were scored for reduction and evidence of osteoarthrosis using previously published grading scales. This study evaluated 15 fractures in 13 dogs with a mean follow-up time of 43 months. Osteoarthrosis developed or progressed radiographically in all elbows. Peak vertical force (PVF) was significantly reduced (p <0.01) in the affected limb, however vertical impulse (VI) did not differ (p = 0.12) when compared to the opposite normal limb. Pain-free range of motion was reduced in flexion (p <0.01), but not in extension (p = 0.98) when compared to the normal limb. Fracture reduction score did not correlate with follow-up OA score (p = 0.07), PVF (p = 0.40), VI (p = 0.72), flexion (p =0.50), or extension (p = 0.62). Due to the high incidence of PTO, owners should be warned of the possibility of declining limb function over time despite near anatomic reduction.