Two-color Microarray Experiments

Summary

Objectives: Microarray gene expression experiments have a complex technical background. Knowledge about certain technical details is inevitable to judge alternatives for both experimental design and analysis. Here, we introduce the necessary details for the so-called two-color microarray experiments and review major sources of technical variance.

Methods: We follow the sequence of experimental steps during a typical two-color microarray gene expression experiment, stressing decisive points in the choice of technique, experimental handling and biophysical basics. We point out where technical variation is to be expected.

Results: Tissue storage, RNA extraction techniques, as well as the microarray hybridization represent major components of technical variance to be considered. Depending on the possibilities for access to the biomedical material under investigation, choice of amplification and labeling techniques can also be decisive to avoid additional technical variance. The two-color microarray experimental approach seeks to avoid a group of probe-level technical biases making use of the advantages of an incomplete block-design.

Conclusions: It is worth to know the major sources of technical variance during the typical experimental sequence, both for choice of experimental design and techniques of molecular biology, as well as for the understanding of quality control and normalization approaches. Here, early investments pay at the level of reduced technical variance, allowing for enhanced detection levels for the effects under investigation.

Keywords

Agilent - chip - comparative hybridization - gene expression - microarray - technical variance

• References

• 1 Schena M. Microarray analysis. New Jersey: Wiley; 2003
• 2 Tefferi A. et al. Primer on Medical Genomics, Part III: Microarray Experiments and Data Analysis. Mayo Clin Proc 2002; 77: 927-40.
• 3 Van Gelder RN. et al. Amplified RNA synthesized from limited quantities of heterogeneous cDNA. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1990; 87: 1663-7.
• 4 Klur S. et al. Evaluation of procedures of smallsize samples for hybridization on microarrays. Genomics 2004; 83: 508-17.
• 5 Duggan DJ. et al. Expression profiling using cDNA microarrays. Nat Genet 1999; 21: 10-4.
• 6 Alwine J, Kemp D, Stark G. Method for detection of specific RNAs in agarose gels by transfer to diazobenzyloxymethyl-paper and hybridization with DNA probes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1977; 74 (12) 5350-4.
• 7 Southern E. et al. Analyzing and comparing nucleic acid sequences by hybridization to arrays of oligonucleotides: evaluation using experimental models. Genomics 1992; 13 (04) 1008-17.
• 8 Lipshutz RJ. et al. High density synthetic oligonucleotide arrays. Nat Genet 1999; 21 (Suppl. 01) Suppl 20-4.
• 9 DeRisi J. et al. Use of a cDNA microarray to analyse gene expression patterns in human cancer. Nat Genet 1996; 14 (04) 457-60.
• 10 Eisen M, Brown P. DNA arrays for analysis of gene expression. Methods Enzymol 1999; 303: 179-205.
• 11 Katzer M, Kummert F, Sagerer G. Methods for automatic microarray image segmentation. IEEE Trans Nanobioscience 2003; 2 (04) 202-14.
• 12 King HC, Sinha AA. Gene Expression Profile Analysis by DNA Microarrays: Promise and Pitfalls. JAMA 2002; 286 (18) 2280-8.
• 13 Landgrebe J. et al. Efficient Two-Sample Designs for Microarray Experiments with Biological Replications. In Silico Biol 2004; 4: 0038
• 14 Bretz F. et al. Design and Analysis of Two-color Microarray Experiments using Linear Models. Methods Inf Med 2005; 44: 423-30. (this issue)
• 15 http://www.agilent.com
• 16 Rishi AS. et al. DNA Microarrays: Gene Expression Profiling in Plants. In. Goyal A, Mehta SL, Lodha ML. (eds) Reviews in Plant Biochemistry and Biotechnology. 2002. 1 81-100.
• 17 Parmigiani G. et al. The Analysis of Gene Expression Data. Heidelberg: Springer; 2003
• 18 Sültmann H. cDNA microarrays for gene expression studies in complex disease. 2001 http://www.biometrie.uni-heidelberg.de/workshops/bamm2001/talk_Sueltmann.pdf
• 19 Agilent Technologies. Agilent Sure Print Technology – Content centered microarray design enabling speed and flexibility. 2003 http://www.agilent.com
• 20 Simon RM. et al. Design and Analysis of DNA Microarray Investigations. Heidelberg: Springer; 2003
• 21 Repsilber D, Ziegler A. Sample selection for Microarray studies. Methods Inf Med 2005; 44: 461-7. (this issue)
• 22 Kane MD. et al. Assessment of the sensitivity and specificity of oligonucleotide (50mer) microarrays. Nucleic Acids Res 2000; 28 (22) 4552-7.
• 23 Ittrich C. Intensity-dependent Normalization for cDNA-Chips. Methods Inf Med 2005; 44: 418-22. (this issue)
• 24 Rahnenführer J. Image Analysis for cDNA Microarrays. Methods Inf Med 2005; 44: 405-7. (this issue)
• 25 Khomyakova EB. et al. Innovative instrumentation for microarray scanning and analysis: Application for characterization of oligonucleotide duplexes behaviour. Cell Mol Biol (Noisy-legrand) 2004; 50 (03) 217-24.
• 26 Breit S. et al. Impact of pre-analytical handling on bone marrow mRNA gene expression. Br J Haematol 2004; 126: 231-43.
• 27 Watson SJ. et al. The “Chip” as a Specific Genetic Tool. Biol Psychiatry 2000; 48: 1147-56.
• 28 Brazma A. et al. Minimum information about a microarray experiment (MIAME) – towards standards for microarray data. Nat Genet 2001; 29: 365-71.