Methods Inf Med 2006; 45(03): 283-287
DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1634076
Original Article
Schattauer GmbH

Where to in the Next Ten Years of Health Informatics Education?

J. R. Moehr
1   School of Health Information Science, University of Victoria, Victoria, BC, Canada
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
06 February 2018 (online)

Summary

Objectives: To explore whether education in health/ medical informaticsa should continue to evolve along the lines pursued since the early seventies, or whether a change is advisable.

Methods: Roots and key resulting characteristics for European and US American approaches HI education are identified. In Europe holistic approaches based on a synthesis of medicine and informatics (= computer science) with programs ranging from vocational training through university programs to doctoral and postdoctoral programs were characteristic. The US American approaches emphasized the higher levels of education and a diverse selection of specialized subjects. Changes in health and health informatics are summarized.

Results: Two types of changes are identified: high-tech applications arising at the interface of imaging, robotics, and the -omics (genomics, proteomics, metabolomics), and invasive applications centering on consumer health informatics and a move from curative to prospective health care.

Conclusions: It is proposed that curative medicine is adequately served by current educational approaches, but that the move towards prospective health care requires a move towards education and change management for health professionals and health informatics professionals.

 
  • References

  • 1 Shortliffe EHS. et al Medical Informatics: Computer Applications in Health Care and Biomedicine. Heidelberg. New York: Springer; 2000
  • 2 Blois MS, Wasserman AI. A Graduate Academic Program for Medical Information Science. Medinfo 1974; 74 Stockholm, Sweden: IFIP
  • 3 Anderson J, Grémy F, Pagès JC. (eds.) Education in Informatics of Health Personnel. IFIP Medical Informatics Monograph Series 1. Amsterdam New York, Oxford: North Holland; 1974
  • 4 Moehr JR. The Quest for Identity of Health Informatics and for Guidance to Education in it – The German Reisensburg Conference of 1973 Revisited. In Haux R, McCray A, Lun KC. (eds.) Yearbook of Medical Informatics 2004 Stuttgart: Schattauer 2004; 200-9.
  • 5 Moehr JR. English Translation of the Minutes of the Invitational Workshop Goals, Methods and Contents for Education in Medical Informatics. In Haux R, McCray AT, Kulikowsky C. (eds.) Yearbook of Medical Informatics 2004 Stuttgart: Schattauer 2004; 210-9.
  • 6 van Bemmel JH, Sollet PCGM, Grashuis JL. Education in Medical Informatics in the Netherlands – a Nationwide Policy and the Erasmus Curriculum. Methods Inf Med 1989; 28 (04) 227-33.
  • 7 van Bemmel JH. A Comprehensive Model for Medical Information Processing. Methods Inf Med 1983; 22 (03) 124-30.
  • 8 Hasman A, Albert A. Education and Training in Health Informatics: Guidelines for European Curricula. Int J Med Inf 1997; 45: 91-110.
  • 9 Hasman A. et al (eds.) Education and Training in Health Informatics in Europe. State of the Art – Guidelines – Applications. Amsterdam: IOS Press; 1995
  • 10 Moehr JR. Training and Education in Medical Informatics. In: Medinfo ’83. North Holland 1983
  • 11 Moehr JR. Education of Specialists in Medical Informatics: The Heidelberg/Heilbronn Experience in the Federal Republic of Germany. Med Inform 1984; 9: 299-300.
  • 12 Duncan KA. Health Computing: Curriculum for an Emerging Profession. Procs. ACM ’78 1978; 277-85.
  • 13 Duncan KA. A Model Curriculum for a Doctoral Level Program in Health Computing. New York: ACM; 1981
  • 14 Haux R. (ed.) Recommendations of the International Medical Informatics Association (IMIA) on Education in Health and Medical Informatics. Methods Inf Med 2000; 39: 267-77.
  • 15 Murphy J. et al Health Infromatics Education for Clinicians and Managers – What’s Holding up Progress?. Int J Med Inf 2004; 73: 205-13.
  • 16 Wingert F. Medical Informatics. Lecture Notes in Medical Informatics. Lindberg DAB, Reichertz PL. (eds.) Berlin, Heidelberg. New York: Springer; 1981: 247
  • 17 Hasman A. Description of a Block Course in Medical Informatics. Methods Inf Med 1989; 28 (04) 239-42.
  • 18 Moehr JR, Sawinski R. On Priming Medical Students in Medical Informatics. Methods Inf Med 1985; 24: 149-54.
  • 19 AAMC P. Physicians for the 21st Century (The GPEP Report). Washington: Association of the American Medical Colleges 1984
  • 20 AAMC P. Report II: Contemporary Issues in Medicine: Medical Informatics and Population Health. Washington, DC: Association of American Medical Colleges; 1998: 25
  • 21 Espino JU, Levine MG. An Overview of the Medical Informatics Curriculum in Medical Schools. In: AMIA Annual Symposium. Orlando, FL: Hanley & Belfus; 1998
  • 22 Snyderman R, Williams SR. Prospective Medicine: The next Health Care Transformation. Acad Medicine 2003; 78: 1079-84.
  • 23 Mohan J, Jacoob RRR. The Malaysian Telehealth Flagship Application: a national approach to health data protection and utilisation and consumer rights. Int Journ Medical Informatics 2004; 73 (03) 217-27.
  • 24 Noorani HZ, Picot J. Assessment of Video Conferencing in Telehealth in Canada. Canadian Coordinating Office for Health Technology Assessment CCOHTA: Ottawa. 2001; 100
  • 25 Moehr JR. Final Evaluation Report. BC Telehealth Program. University of Victoria: Victoria 2003; p 306
  • 26 Pinciroli F. et al Security Concept in “My Angel Web”, a Web Site for the Individual Patient at Risk of Emergency. Int J Med Inf 2000; 60 (02) 203-11.