Yearb Med Inform 2006; 15(01): 136-144
DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1638463
Reviews
Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart

Electronic Health Record Standards

D. Kalra
1   CHIME, University College London, London, United Kingdom
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
07 March 2018 (online)

Summary

Objectives

This paper seeks to provide an overview of the initiatives that are proceeding internationally to develop standards for the exchange of electronic health record (EHR) information between EHR systems.

Methods

The paper reviews the clinical and ethico-legal requirements and research background on the representation and communication of EHR data, which primarily originates from Europe through a series of EU funded Health Telematics projects over the past thirteen years. The major concepts that underpin the information models and knowledge models are summarised. These provide the requirements and the best evidential basis from which HER communications standards should be developed.

Results

The main focus of EHR communications standardisation is presently occurring at a European level, through the Committee for European Normalisation (CEN). The major constructs of the CEN 13606 model are outlined. Complementary activity is taking place in ISO and in HL7, and some of these efforts are also summarised.

Conclusion

There is a strong prospect that a generic EHR interoperability standard can be agreed at a European (and hopefully international) level. Parts of the challenge of EHR interoperability cannot yet be standardised, because good solutions to the preservation of clinical meaning across heterogeneous systems remain to be explored. Further research and empirical projects are therefore also needed.

 
  • References

  • 1 Department of Health UK. Delivering 21st Century IT Support for the NHS National Strategic Programme. The Stationery Office. 2002
  • 2 Alvares R. Integrating Telehealth: Infoway perspective. Proceedings of the 7th Annual Meeting of the Canadian Society for Telehealth; 2004 Oct 3-5. 2004 Quebec City, Canada. Available from: URL: http://www.infoway-inforoute.ca/pdf/CST_TelehealthV8_E.pdf (Last accessed Nov 18, 2004).
  • 3 bAustralian Department of Health and Ageing. HealthConnect an overview; May 2004. Available from: URL: http://www7.health.gov.au/healthconnect/pdf/HealthConnect_overview_May2004.pdf (Last accessed Nov 18, 2004)
  • 4 Harnessing information technology to improve health care. United States Department of Health and Human Services. Fact Sheet 6th May 2004. Available from http://www.hhs.gov/news/press/2004pres/20040427a.html (Last accessed 4 November 2004).
  • 5 Smith R. What clinical information do doctors need?. BMJ 1996; Oct; 313: 1062-8.
  • 6 Waegemann CP. Medical Record Institute’s survey of electronic health record trends and usage. Toward an Electronic Health Record Europe ‘99 Nov 1999; 147-158.
  • 7 Shortliffe EH. The evolution of health-care records in the era of the Internet. Medinfo 9 1998; 1 Suppl: 8-14.
  • 8 Patterson D, Ingram D, Kalra D. Information for clinical governance. In: Clinical governance: making it happen. London: Royal Society of Medicine Press Ltd; 1999
  • 9 Williams JG, Morgan J. The clinician-information interface. In: Greenes RA, et al. editors. Medinfo 8. 1995. 801-5..
  • 10 Tange HJ. Consultation of medical narratives in the electronic medical record. Methods of Information in Medicine Dec 1999; 38 (4-5): 289-93.
  • 11 Ingram D, Southgate L, Kalra D, Griffith S, Heard S. et al. The GEHR Requirements for Clinical Comprehensiveness. European Commission. Brussels: 1992. The Good European Health Record Project: Deliverable 4. (19 chapters, 144 pages).
  • 12 Ingram D, Hap B, Lloyd D, Grubb P. et al. The GEHR Requirements for Portability. European Commission. Brussels: 1992. The Good European Health Record Project: Deliverable 5.
  • 13 Ingram D, Lloyd D, Baille O, Grubb P. et al. The GEHR Requirements for Communication Capacity. European Commission. Brussels: 1992. The Good European Health Record Project: Deliverable 6.
  • 14 Ingram D, Murphy J, Griffith S, Machado H. et al. band others. GEHR Educational Requirements. European Commission. Brussels: 1993. The Good European Health Record Project: Deliverable 9.
  • 15 Heard S, Doyle L. et al. The GEHR Requirements for Ethical and Legal Acceptability. European Commission. Brussels: 1993. The Good European Health Record Project: Deliverable 8. (9 Chapters, 68 pages) Available from http://www.chime.ucl.ac.uk/work-areas/ehrs/GEHR/EUCEN/del8.pdf (Last accessed 22 July 2004).
  • 16 Dixon R, Grubb PA, Lloyd D, Kalra D. Consolidated List of Requirements. EHCR Support Action Deliverable 1.4. European Commission DGXIII. Brussels: May 2001. 59pp. Available from http://www.chime.ucl.ac.uk/HealthI/EHCR-SupA/del1-4v1_3.PDF
  • 17 Hurlen P. editor; Project Team 1-011. ENV 12265: Electronic Healthcare Record Architecture. CEN TC/251. Brussels: 1995
  • 18 Kay S, Marley T. editors; Project Team 1-026. ENV 13606: EHCR Communications: Part 1 Electronic Healthcare Record Architecture. CEN TC/251. Brussels: 1999
  • 19 Schloeffel P. editor. Requirements for an Electronic Health Record Architecture. International Standards Organisation. 2002 ISO TC 215/SC N; ISO/ TS 18308.
  • 20 Kalra D. Clinical Foundations and Information Architecture for the Implementation of a Federated Health Record Service. PhD Thesis; University of London: 2002. Available from http://www.ehr.chime.ucl.ac.uk/docs/Kalra,%20Dipak%20(PhD%202002).pdf (Last accessed September 2005).
  • 21 Iakovidis I. From electronic medical record to personal health records: present situation and trends in European Union in the area of electronic healthcare records. Medinfo 9 1998; 1 Suppl: 18-22.
  • 22 Lloyd D, Kalra D, Beale T, Maskens A, Dixon R, Ellis J, Camplin D, Grubb P, Ingram D. editors. The GEHR Final Architecture Description. European Commission. Brussels: 1995. The Good European Health Record Project: Deliverable 19. 11 chapters; 250 pages. available from http://www.chime.ucl.ac.uk/HealthI/GEHR/EUCEN/del19.pdf
  • 23 Grimson J, Grimson W, Berry D, Stephens G, Felton E, Kalra D, Toussaint P, Weier OW. A CORBA-based integration of distributed electronic healthcare records using the synapses approach. IEEE Trans Inf Technol Biomed Sep 1998; 02 (03) 124-38.
  • 24 Sottile PA, Ferrara FM, Grimson W, Kalra D, Scherrer JR. The holistic healthcare information system. Toward an Electronic Health Record Europe ‘99 Nov 1999; 259-66.
  • 25 Beale T. The GEHR Archetype System. The Good Electronic Health Record Project, Australia; Aug 2000. http://www.gehr.org/technical/archetypes/gehr_archetypes.html
  • 26 Kalra D. editor. Synapses ODP Information Viewpoint. EU Telematics Application Programme. Brussels: 1998. The Synapses Project: Final Deliverable. 10 chapters, 64 pages.
  • 27 Kalra D, Freriks G, Lloyd D, Klein G, Beale T, Heard S. et al. Towards a revised CEN standard for Electronic Health Record Communication. In: Brown P. editor. Proc Mobile-Health Europe 2002. Medical Records Institute; April 2002.
  • 28 Mennerat F, Booth N. Concepts underlying continuity of care the system of concepts described in ENV 13940. Inform Prim Care 2002; 10: 31-8.
  • 29 Health Level Seven. Please see http://www.hl7.org (Last accessed September 2005).
  • 30 Dolin RH, Alschuler L, Boyer S, Beebe C. An update on HL7’s XML-based document representation standards. Procs AMIA Annual Symposium 2000; 190-4.
  • 31 The openEHR Foundation. Please see http://www.openehr.org (Last accessed September 2005)