Download PDF
Yearb Med Inform 2011; 20(01): 8-14
DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1638730
Keynote
Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart

Health informatics 3.0

Dipak Kalra
1   University College London
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
06 March 2018 (online)

Also available at
   Permissions and Reprints

Summary

Web 3.0 promises us smart computer services that will interact with each other and leverage knowledge about us and our immediate context to deliver prioritised and relevant information to support decisions and actions. Healthcare must take advantage of such new knowledge-integrating services, in particular to support better cooperation between professionals of different disciplines working in different locations, and to enable well-informed co-operation between clinicians and patients. To grasp the potential of Web 3.0 we will need well-harmonised semantic resources that can richly connect virtual teams and link their strategies to real-time and tailored evidence. Facts, decision logic, care pathway steps, alerts, education need to be embedded within components that can interact with multiple EHR systems and services consistently. Using Health Informatics 3.0 a patient’s current situation could be compared with the outcomes of very similar patients (from across millions) to deliver personalised care recommendations. The integration of EHRs with biomedical sciences (‘omics) research results and predictive models such as the Virtual Physiological Human could help speed up the translation of new knowledge into clinical practice. The mission, and challenge, for Health Informatics 3.0 is to enable healthy citizens, patients and professionals to collaborate within a knowledge-empowered social network in which patient specific information and personalised real-time evidence are seamlessly interwoven.

Keywords

Semantic web - semantic interoperability - patient engagement - personalised medicine - trusted services
 

  • References

  • 1 Berners-Lee T, Hendler J, Lassila O. The Semantic Web A - new form of Web content that is meaningful to computers will unleash a revolution of new possibilities. Scientific American. May 17, 2001
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 2 Dora CostaL. The economics and demography of aging. In PNAS - Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America (August 14, 2007), Vol. 104 No. 33. 13217-8.
    PubMed
  • 3 The UK Collaborative Group for HIV and STI Surveillance. Testing Times. HIV and other Sexually Transmitted Infections in the United Kingdom: 2007. London: Health Protection Agency, Centre for Infections; November 2007
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 4 The European Society for Immunodeficiencies registry. Please see http://www.esid.org/workingparty.php?party=2&sub=2&id=233 [Last accessed 30 April 2011]
    PubMed
  • 5 Stroetman V, Kalra D, Lewalle P, Rector A, Rodrigues J, Stroetman K, Surjan G, Ustun B, Virtanen M, Zanstra P. 2009 Semantic Interoperability for Better health and Safer Healthcare [34 pages]. The European Commission. ISBN-13: 978-92-79-11139-6. DOI: 10.2759/38514. http://ec.europa.eu/information_society/activities/health/docs/publications/2009/2009semantic-health-report.pdf
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 6 Rogers J, Jain NL, Hayes GM. Evaluation of an implementation of PRODIGY phase two. Proceedings / AMIA Annual Symposium 1999; 604-8.
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 7 Kalra D. Editor. The Synapses Object Model and Object Dictionary. EU Telematics Application Programme. Brussels: 1997. The Synapses Project: Deliverable USER 1.3.2. (Copy available from the author on request)
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 8 Lovis C, Douglas T, Pasche E, Ruch P, Colaert D, Stroetmann K. DebugIT: building a European distributed clinical data mining network to foster the fight against microbial diseases. Stud Health Technol Inform 2009; 148: 50-9.
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 9 Krog R, Markwell D, Dolin R, Gabriel D, Cheetham E, Spackman K. et al. Using SNOMED CT in HL7 Version 3; Implementation Guide, Draft Standard for Trial Use. Health Level Seven; 2007
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 10 Kalra D, Musen M. ARGOS Policy Brief on Semantic Interoperability. ARGOS is a Transatlantic Observatory for Meeting Global Health Policy Challenges through ICT-Enabled Solutions. (To be published summer 2011). Please see http://www.eurorec.org/RD/ARGOS.cfm
    PubMed
  • 11 Qamar R, Rector A. Semantic Issues in Integrating Data from Different Models to Achieve Data Interoperability. Proc Medinfo 2007. Kuhn K, Warren JR, Leong TY. editors. IOS Press; 2007
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 12 Veli StroetmannN, Jean-Pierre Thierry, Karl A. Stroetmann, Alexander Dobrev. eHealth for Safety - Impact of ICT on Patient Safety and Risk Management: European Commission. eHealth for Safety Report, October 2007. Luxembourg: Office for Off icial Publications of the European Communities; 2007
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 13 Study participant Recruitment and Retention in Clinical Trials: Emerging strategies in Europe, the US and Asia. Business Insights; June 2007
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 14 Please see http://www.vph-noe.eu/
    PubMed
  • 15 Jones R, Pearson J, McGregor S, Cawsey AJ, Barrett A, Craig N. et al. Randomised trial of personalised computer based information for cancer patients. BMJ Nov 1999; 319 (7219): 1241-7.
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 16 Please see http://www.patientslikeme.com
    PubMed