Subscribe to RSS
DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1641741
Disruptive Hearing Technologies and Mild Sensorineural Hearing Loss II: Current Research on Affordable Hearing Technologies and Direct-to-Consumer Models
Publication History
Publication Date:
15 June 2018 (online)

Abstract
Recently, President Trump signed into law the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Reauthorization Act of 2017, which included the Over-the-Counter Hearing Aid Act designed to provide greater public accessibility to and affordability of amplification for individuals with self-identified mild and moderate hearing loss through the provision of over-the-counter (OTC) hearing aids (HAs) with a direct-to-consumer (DTC) delivery model. American Speech-Language-Hearing Association and American Academy of Audiology Position Statements on OTC HAs state that these devices should only be used for adults with mild hearing losses. DTC amplification and service delivery has been available to consumers in a variety of forms for a significant period of time. However, FDA-regulated OTC HAs will not be available as described in the new law until the FDA publishes the required guidance related to the technology, safety, and labeling of such devices. With the clear similarities in mind between present and future amplification options, a literature search was conducted to review studies assessing outcomes for low-cost and DTC HAs and service-delivery models to inform what we may expect as OTC HAs enter the market. Nine studies were identified which assessed: (1) electroacoustic capabilities of low-cost and DTC HAs, (2) use of these devices in field trials, or (3) efficacy of DTC models. None of the studies reported outcomes specifically for participants with mild hearing loss. The studies had poor external validity because none included all factors that would exist in realistic uses of OTC HAs within a DTC model. Additional research will be needed as OTC HAs become available and different delivery models are proposed.
-
References
- 1 Mamo SK, Nieman CL, Lin FR. Prevalence of untreated hearing loss by income among older adults in the United States. J Health Care Poor Underserved 2016; 27 (04) 1812-1818
- 2 Food and Drug Administration. Regulatory requirements for hearing aid devices and personal sound amplification products - draft guidance for industry and food and drug administration staff. November 7, 2013. Available at: https://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/DeviceRegulationandGuidance/GuidanceDocuments/ucm373461.htm . Accessed December 25, 2017
- 3 President's Council of Advisors on Science and Technology. Letter to the president. October 2015. Available at: https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/sites/default/files/microsites/ostp/PCAST/pcast_hearing_tech_letterreport_final.pdf . Accessed November 19, 2017
- 4 Blustein J, Weinstein BE. Opening the market for lower cost hearing aids: regulatory change can improve the health of older Americans. Am J Public Health 2016; 106 (06) 1032-1035
- 5 U.S. Congress. H.R. 2430: FDA Reauthorization Act of 2017. August 29, 2017. Available at: https://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/115/hr2430/summary . Accessed November 19, 2017
- 6 National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine (NASEM). Hearing health care for adults: priorities for improving access and affordability. June 2, 2016. Available at: http://nationalacademies.org/hmd/Reports/2016/Hearing-Health-Care-for-Adults.aspx . Accessed November 19, 2017
- 7 American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. ASHA position statement on policy related to over-the-counter hearing aids. February 14, 2017. Available at: https://www.asha.org/News/2017/ASHA-Position-Statement-on-Policy-Related-to-Over-the-Counter-Hearing-Aids/ . Accessed November 8, 2017
- 8 American Academy of Audiology. Over-the-counter (OTC) hearing devices. Issue statement. January 26, 2017. Available at: https://www.audiology.org/publications/over-counter-otc-hearing-devices . Accessed November 8, 2017
- 9 Johnson CE, Danhauer JL, Ellis BB, Jilla AM. Hearing aid benefit in patients with mild sensorineural hearing loss: A systematic review. J Am Acad Audiol 2016; 27 (04) 293-310
- 10 Roup CM, Noe CM. Hearing aid outcomes for listeners with high-frequency hearing loss. Am J Audiol 2009; 18 (01) 45-52
- 11 Parving A, Christensen B. Clinical trial of a low-cost, solar-powered hearing aid. Acta Otolaryngol 2004; 124 (04) 416-420
- 12 World Health Organization (WHO). Guidelines for Hearing Aids and Services for Developing Countries. 2nd ed. September 2004. Available at: www.whqlibdoc.who.int/publications/2004/9241592435_eng.pdf . May 7, 2018
- 13 Byrne D, Dillon H. The National Acoustic Laboratories' (NAL) new procedure for selecting the gain and frequency response of a hearing aid. Ear Hear 1986; 7 (04) 257-265
- 14 Cox RM, Alexander GC. The International Outcome Inventory for Hearing Aids (IOI-HA): psychometric properties of the English version. Int J Audiol 2002; 41 (01) 30-35
- 15 McPherson B, Wong ETL. Effectiveness of an affordable hearing aid with elderly persons. Disabil Rehabil 2005; 27 (11) 601-609
- 16 Dillon H, James A, Ginis J. Client Oriented Scale of Improvement (COSI) and its relationship to several other measures of benefit and satisfaction provided by hearing aids. J Am Acad Audiol 1997; 8 (01) 27-43
- 17 Cox RM, Gilmore C. Development of the Profile of Hearing Aid Performance (PHAP). J Speech Hear Res 1990; 33 (02) 343-357
- 18 Sacco G, Gonfrier S, Teboul B. , et al. Clinical evaluation of an over-the-counter hearing aid (TEO First®) in elderly patients suffering of mild to moderate hearing loss. BMC Geriatr 2016; 16: 136
- 19 Gatehouse S. The Glasgow Hearing Aid Benefit Profile: Derivation and validation of a client-centered outcome measure for hearing aid services. J Am Acad Audiol 1999; 10: 80-103
- 20 Reed NS, Betz J, Kendig N, Korczak M, Lin FR. Personal sound amplification products vs a conventional hearing aid for speech understanding in noise. JAMA 2017; 318 (01) 89-90
- 21 Spahr AJ, Dorman MF, Litvak LM. , et al. Development and validation of the AzBio sentence lists. Ear Hear 2012; 33 (01) 112-117
- 22 Rønne F, Rossing R. Are hearing aids the better rehabilitative choice when compared to PSAPs?. Hear Rev 2016; 23 (11) 26
- 23 Cheng CM, McPherson B. Over-the-counter hearing aids: electroacoustic characteristics and possible target client groups. Audiology 2000; 39 (02) 110-116
- 24 McCandless G, Lyregaard P. Prescription of gain and output (POGO) for hearing aids. Hear Instrum 1983; 3: 16-21
- 25 Libby E. The 1/3–2/3 insertion gain hearing aid selection guide. Hear Instrum 1986; 37: 27-28
- 26 Cornelisse LE, Seewald RC, Jamieson DG. The input/output formula: a theoretical approach to the fitting of personal amplification devices. J Acoust Soc Am 1995; 97 (03) 1854-1864
- 27 Callaway SL, Punch JL. An electroacoustic analysis of over-the-counter hearing aids. Am J Audiol 2008; 17 (01) 14-24
- 28 Chan ZYT, McPherson B. Over-the-counter hearing aids: a lost decade for change. BioMed Res Int 2015; 2015: 827463
- 29 Reed NS, Betz J, Lin FR, Mamo SK. Pilot electroacoustic analyses of a sample of direct-to-consumer amplification products. Otol Neurotol 2017; 38 (06) 804-808
- 30 Keidser G, Dillon H, Flax M, Ching T, Brewer S. The NAL-NL2 prescription procedure. Audiology Res 2011; 1 (01) e24
- 31 Humes LE, Rogers SE, Quigley TM, Main AK, Kinney DL, Herring C. The effects of service-delivery model and purchase price on hearing-aid outcomes in older adults: a randomized double-blind placebo-controlled clinical trial. Am J Audiol 2017; 26 (01) 53-79
- 32 Cox RM, Alexander GC, Gilmore C. Development of the Connected Speech Test (CST). Ear Hear 1987; 8 (5, Suppl): 119S-126S
- 33 Johnson CE, Danhauer JL, Gavin RB, Karns SR, Reith AC, Lopez IP. The “hearing aid effect” 2005: a rigorous test of the visibility of new hearing aid styles. Am J Audiol 2005; 14 (02) 169-175