Thromb Haemost 1981; 46(04): 752-756
DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1653469
Original Article
Schattauer GmbH Stuttgart

Comparison of Thrombelastography with Common Coagulation Tests

L Zuckerman
The Evanston Hospital, Department of Surgery and Medicine, Northwestern University, Vogelback Computing Center, Evanston, III., U.S.A
,
E Cohen
The Evanston Hospital, Department of Surgery and Medicine, Northwestern University, Vogelback Computing Center, Evanston, III., U.S.A
,
J P Vagher
The Evanston Hospital, Department of Surgery and Medicine, Northwestern University, Vogelback Computing Center, Evanston, III., U.S.A
,
E Woodward
The Evanston Hospital, Department of Surgery and Medicine, Northwestern University, Vogelback Computing Center, Evanston, III., U.S.A
,
J A Caprini
The Evanston Hospital, Department of Surgery and Medicine, Northwestern University, Vogelback Computing Center, Evanston, III., U.S.A
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Received 09 October 1981

Accepted 30 October 1981

Publication Date:
05 July 2018 (online)

Summary

Thrombelastography, although proven as a useful research tool has not been evaluated for its clinical utility against common coagulation laboratory tests. In this study we compare the thrombelastographic measurements with six common tests (the hematocrit, platelet count, fibrinogen, prothrombin time, activated thromboplastin time and fibrin split products). For such comparisons, two samples of subjects were selected, 141 normal volunteers and 121 patients with cancer. The data was subjected to various statistical techniques such as correlation, ANOVA, canonical and discriminant analysis to measure the extent of the correlations between the two sets of variables and their relative strength to detect blood clotting abnormalities. The results indicate that, although there is a strong relationship between the thrombelastographic variables and these common laboratory tests, the thrombelastographic variables contain additional information on the hemostatic process.