Download PDF
CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet 2018; 40(06): 360-368
DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1657754
Review Article
Thieme Revinter Publicações Ltda Rio de Janeiro, Brazil

Guidelines for HPV-DNA Testing for Cervical Cancer Screening in Brazil

Recomendações para o uso de testes de DNA-HPV no rastreamento do câncer do colo útero no Brasil
Luiz Carlos Zeferino
1   Faculdade de Ciências Médicas, Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil
,
Joana Bragança Bastos
1   Faculdade de Ciências Médicas, Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil
,
Diama Bhadra Andrade Peixoto do Vale
1   Faculdade de Ciências Médicas, Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil
,
Rita Maria Zanine
2   Universidade Federal do Paraná, Curitiba, Paraná, Brazil
,
Yara Lucia Mendes Furtado de Melo
3   Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
,
Walquíria Quida Salles Pereira Primo
4   Universidade de Brasília, Brasília, Distrito Federal, Brazil
,
Flávia de Miranda Corrêa
5   Instituto Nacional de Câncer José Alencar Gomes da Silva, Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
,
Isabel Cristina Chulvis do Val
6   Universidade Federal Fluminense, Niterói, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
,
Fábio Russomano
7   Instituto Nacional de Saúde da Mulher, da Criança e do Adolescente Fernandes Figueira, da Fundação Oswaldo Cruz, Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

24 July 2017

08 March 2018

Publication Date:
06 June 2018 (online)

   Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Evidence-based clinical guidelines ensure best practice protocols are available in health care. There is a widespread use of human papillomavirus deoxyribonucleic acid (HPV-DNA) tests in Brazil, regardless of the lack of official guidelines. On behalf of the Brazilian Association for the Lower Genital Tract Pathology and Colposcopy (ABPTGIC, in the Portuguese acronym), a team of reviewers searched for published evidence and developed a set of recommendations for the use of HPV-DNA tests in cervical cancer screening in Brazil. The product of this process was debated and consensus was sought by the participants. One concern of the authors was the inclusion of these tests in the assessment of women with cytologic atypia and women treated for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN). Testing for HPV is recommended in an organized screening scenario to identify women with precursor lesions or asymptomatic cervical cancer older than 30 years of age, and it can be performed every 5 years. It also has value after the cytology showing atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance (ASC-US) or low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (LSILs) as a triage test for colposcopy, in the investigation of other cytological alterations when no abnormal findings are observed at colposcopy, seeking to exclude disease, or, further, after treatment of high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia, to rule out residual disease.

Resumo

O uso de diretrizes clínicas baseadas em evidências visa assegurar as melhores práticas na área de cuidado à saúde. O uso de testes de ácido desoxirribonucleico de papilomavírus humano (DNA-HPV) vem crescendo e se disseminando sem que existam recomendações de uso no cenário brasileiro. Em nome da Associação Brasileira de Patologia do Trato Genital Inferior e Colposcopia (ABPTGIC), grupos de revisores pesquisaram evidências e formularam recomendações para o uso dos testes de DNA-HPV no rastreamento do câncer do colo do útero, no seguimento de mulheres com atipias citológicas, e após tratamento de neoplasia intraepitelial cervical (NIC). O produto desse processo foi debatido e foi buscado consenso entre participantes. Os testes de DNA-HPV são recomendados num cenário de rastreamento organizado para identificação de mulheres portadoras de lesões precursoras ou câncer assintomático com mais de 30 anos e podem ser realizados a cada 5 anos. Também têm valor após a citologia mostrando células escamosas atípicas de significado indeterminado (ASC-US) ou lesão intraepitelial escamosa de baixo grau (LSIL) como teste de triagem para colposcopia, na investigação de outras alterações citológicas quando não são observados achados anormais à colposcopia, buscando excluir doença, ou, ainda, no seguimento após tratamento das neoplasias intraepiteliais de alto grau, para exclusão de doença residual.

Keywords

screening - cervical neoplasms - DNA-HPV probes - cervical intraepithelial neoplasia - cytology

Palavras-chave

rastreamento - neoplasias do colo do útero - sondas de DNA de HPV - neoplasia intraepitelial cervical - citologia
 

  • References

  • 1 Ministério da Saúde. Instituto Nacional de Câncer José Alencar Gomes da Silva. Coordenação de Prevenção. Diretrizes Brasileiras para o Rastreamento do Câncer do Colo do Útero. 2ª ed. Rio de Janeiro, RJ: INCA; 2016
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 2 Ministério da Saúde. Instituto Nacional de Câncer José Alencar Gomes da Silva. Diretrizes Brasileiras para o Rastreamento do Câncer do Colo do Útero . Rio de Janeiro, RJ: INCA; 2011
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 3 US Preventive Services Task Force. Grade Definitions . 2013. https://www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/Page/Name/grade-definitions . Accessed Dec 19, 2016
    PubMed
  • 4 Basu P, Mittal S, Bhadra Vale D, Chami Kharaji Y. Secondary prevention of cervical cancer. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 2018; 47: 73-85 . Doi: 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2017.08.012
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 5 Schiffman M, Doorbar J, Wentzensen N. , et al. Carcinogenic human papillomavirus infection. Nat Rev Dis Primers 2016; 2: 16086 . Doi: 10.1038/nrdp.2016.86
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 6 Ronco G, Giorgi-Rossi P, Carozzi F. , et al. New Technologies for Cervical Cancer screening (NTCC) Working Group. Efficacy of human papillomavirus testing for the detection of invasive cervical cancers and cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol 2010; 11 (03) 249-257 . Doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(09)70360-2
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 7 Arbyn M, Verdoodt F, Snijders PJF. , et al. Accuracy of human papillomavirus testing on self-collected versus clinician-collected samples: a meta-analysis. Lancet Oncol 2014; 15 (02) 172-183 . Doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(13)70570-9
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 8 Koliopoulos G, Nyaga VN, Santesso N. , et al. Cytology versus HPV testing for cervical cancer screening in the general population. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2017; 8: CD008587 . Doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008587.pub2
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 9 Muwonge R, Wesley RS, Nene BM. , et al. Evaluation of cytology and visual triage of human papillomavirus-positive women in cervical cancer prevention in India. Int J Cancer 2014; 134 (12) 2902-2909 . Doi: 10.1002/ijc.28627
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 10 Naucler P, Ryd W, Törnberg S. , et al. Human papillomavirus and Papanicolaou tests to screen for cervical cancer. N Engl J Med 2007; 357 (16) 1589-1597 . Doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa073204
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 11 Khan MJ, Castle PE, Lorincz AT. , et al. The elevated 10-year risk of cervical precancer and cancer in women with human papillomavirus (HPV) type 16 or 18 and the possible utility of type-specific HPV testing in clinical practice. J Natl Cancer Inst 2005; 97 (14) 1072-1079 . Doi: 10.1093/jnci/dji187
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 12 Thomsen LT, Frederiksen K, Munk C, Junge J, Iftner T, Kjaer SK. Long-term risk of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3 or worse according to high-risk human papillomavirus genotype and semi-quantitative viral load among 33,288 women with normal cervical cytology. Int J Cancer 2015; 137 (01) 193-203 . Doi: 10.1002/ijc.29374
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 13 Wright TC, Stoler MH, Behrens CM, Sharma A, Zhang G, Wright TL. Primary cervical cancer screening with human papillomavirus: end of study results from the ATHENA study using HPV as the first-line screening test. Gynecol Oncol 2015; 136 (02) 189-197 . Doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2014.11.076
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 14 Management of a Patient with an Abnormal Cervical Smear: 2002 Update. http://www.has-sante.fr/portail/upload/docs/application/pdf/Frottis_anglais.pdf . Accessed Dec 19, 2016
    PubMed
  • 15 Screening C. Programme and Colposcopy Management. 2016. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/cervical-screening-programme-and-colposcopy-management . Accessed Dec 19, 2016
    PubMed
  • 16 Ministry of Health. National Cervical Screening Programme. Guidelines for Cervical Screening in New Zealand: Incorporating the Management of Women with Abnormal Cervical Smears. 2008. https://www.health.govt.nz/system/files/documents/publications/cervical-screening-guidelines-aug08.pdf . Accessed Dec 19, 2016
    PubMed
  • 17 Massad LS, Einstein MH, Huh WK. , et al. 2012 ASCCP Consensus Guidelines Conference. 2012 updated consensus guidelines for the management of abnormal cervical cancer screening tests and cancer precursors. Obstet Gynecol 2013; 121 (04) 829-846 . Doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3182883a34
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 18 Lee JK, Hong JH, Kang S. , et al. Practice guidelines for the early detection of cervical cancer in Korea: Korean Society of Gynecologic Oncology and the Korean Society for Cytopathology 2012 edition. J Gynecol Oncol 2013; 24 (02) 186-203 . Doi: 10.3802/jgo.2013.24.2.186
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 19 Arrossi S, Paul L, Thouyaret L. Prevención del Cáncer Cervicouterino. Buenos Aires: Instituto Nacional del Cáncer; 2015. http://www.msal.gob.ar/images/stories/bes/graficos/0000000017cnt-manual_recomendaciones_tamizaje_2015_baja.pdf . Accessed Dec 19, 2016
    PubMed
  • 20 Bandyopadhyay S, Austin RM, Dabbs D, Zhao C. Adjunctive human papillomavirus DNA testing is a useful option in some clinical settings for disease risk assessment and triage of females with ASC-H Papanicolaou test results. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2008; 132 (12) 1874-1881 . Doi: 10.1043/1543-2165-132.12.1874
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 21 Longatto-Filho A, Erzen M, Branca M. , et al. Human papillomavirus testing as an optional screening tool in low-resource settings of Latin America: experience from the Latin American Screening study. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2006; 16 (03) 955-962 . Doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1438.2006.00582.x
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 22 Zeferino LC, Rabelo-Santos SH, Villa LL. , et al. Value of HPV-DNA test in women with cytological diagnosis of atypical glandular cells (AGC). Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2011; 159 (01) 160-164 . Doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2011.05.023
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 23 Arbyn M, Roelens J, Simoens C. , et al. Human papillomavirus testing versus repeat cytology for triage of minor cytological cervical lesions. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2013; (03) CD008054 . Doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008054.pub2
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 24 Arbyn M, Ronco G, Anttila A. , et al. Evidence regarding human papillomavirus testing in secondary prevention of cervical cancer. Vaccine 2012; 30 (Suppl. 05) F88-F99 . Doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2012.06.095
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 25 Corrêa FM, Russomano FB, Oliveira CA. Colposcopic triage methods for detecting cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3 after cytopathological diagnosis of low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion: a systematic review on diagnostic tests. Sao Paulo Med J 2012; 130 (01) 44-52 . Doi: 10.1590/S1516-31802012000100008
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 26 Cuzick J, Thomas Cox J, Zhang G. , et al. Human papillomavirus testing for triage of women with low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions. Int J Cancer 2013; 132 (04) 959-966 . Doi: 10.1002/ijc.27723
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 27 Guido R, Schiffman M, Solomon D, Burke L. . ASCUS LSIL Triage Study (ALTS) Group. Postcolposcopy management strategies for women referred with low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions or human papillomavirus DNA-positive atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance: a two-year prospective study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2003; 188 (06) 1401-1405 . Doi: 10.1067/mob.2003.456
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 28 Castle PE, Fetterman B, Poitras N, Lorey T, Shaber R, Kinney W. Relationship of atypical glandular cell cytology, age and human papillomavirus detection to cervical and endometrial cancer risks. Obstet Gynecol 2010; 115 (2 Pt 1): 243-248 . Doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181c799a3
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 29 Melnikow J, McGahan C, Sawaya GF, Ehlen T, Coldman A. Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia outcomes after treatment: long-term follow-up from the British Columbia Cohort Study. J Natl Cancer Inst 2009; 101 (10) 721-728 . Doi: 10.1093/jnci/djp089
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 30 Kitchener HC, Walker PG, Nelson L. , et al. HPV testing as an adjunct to cytology in the follow up of women treated for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. BJOG 2008; 115 (08) 1001-1007 . Doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2008.01748.x
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 31 Park JY, Kim DY, Kim JH, Kim YM, Kim YT, Nam JH. Human papillomavirus test after conization in predicting residual disease in subsequent hysterectomy specimens. Obstet Gynecol 2009; 114 (01) 87-92 . Doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181ab6dca
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 32 Kreimer AR, Schiffman M, Herrero R. , et al. Long-term risk of recurrent cervical human papillomavirus infection and precancer and cancer following excisional treatment. Int J Cancer 2012; 131 (01) 211-218 . Doi: 10.1002/ijc.26349
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 33 Roncaglia MT, Tacla M, Vieira da Motta E. , et al. Evaluation of the combination of cytology and hybrid capture to safely predict the high-grade lesion status of patients treated with conization with large loop excision of the transformation zone. Acta Cytol 2011; 55 (05) 421-425 . Doi: 10.1159/000330808
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 34 Lea JS, Shin CH, Sheets EE. , et al. Endocervical curettage at conization to predict residual cervical adenocarcinoma in situ. Gynecol Oncol 2002; 87 (01) 129-132 . Doi: 10.1006/gyno.2002.6791
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar