Download PDF
J Neurol Surg A Cent Eur Neurosurg 2019; 80(06): 413-422
DOI: 10.1055/s-0039-1692975
Original Article
Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Dual-Use Intraoperative MRI in Glioblastoma Surgery: Results of Resection, Histopathologic Assessment, and Surgical Site Infections

Johannes Wach
1   Department of Neurosurgery, Universitatsklinikum Bonn Zentrum fur Nervenheilkunde, Bonn, North Rhine Westphalia, Germany
,
Claudia Goetz
2   Department of Neurosurgery, Asklepios Kliniken Hamburg GmbH Asklepios Klinik Nord Standort Heidberg, Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany
,
Kasra Shareghi
2   Department of Neurosurgery, Asklepios Kliniken Hamburg GmbH Asklepios Klinik Nord Standort Heidberg, Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany
,
Torben Scholz
2   Department of Neurosurgery, Asklepios Kliniken Hamburg GmbH Asklepios Klinik Nord Standort Heidberg, Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany
3   Department of Neurosurgery, Medical Center University of Aachen, Aachen, NRW, Germany
,
Volker Heßelmann
4   Department of Neuroradiology, Asklepios Kliniken Hamburg GmbH Asklepios Klinik Nord Standort Heidberg, Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany
,
Ann-Kathrin Mager
4   Department of Neuroradiology, Asklepios Kliniken Hamburg GmbH Asklepios Klinik Nord Standort Heidberg, Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany
,
Joachim Gottschalk
5   Department of Neuropathology, Asklepios Kliniken Hamburg GmbH Asklepios Klinik Nord Standort Heidberg, Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany
,
Hartmut Vatter
1   Department of Neurosurgery, Universitatsklinikum Bonn Zentrum fur Nervenheilkunde, Bonn, North Rhine Westphalia, Germany
,
Paul Kremer
2   Department of Neurosurgery, Asklepios Kliniken Hamburg GmbH Asklepios Klinik Nord Standort Heidberg, Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

21 January 2019

04 March 2019

Publication Date:
04 July 2019 (online)

Also available at
   Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Background To achieve maximal resection in glioblastoma (GBM) surgery, intraoperative imaging is important. An intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging (iMRI) suite used for both diagnostic and intraoperative imaging is considered being a reasonable concept for modern hospital management. It is still discussed if the dual use increases the risk of surgical site infections (SSI). This article assesses the rate of gross total resection (GTR), extent of resection (EOR), and histopathology after iMRI-guided resections in patients with GBM. The rate of surgical site infections (SSIs) is evaluated.

Methods In all, 79 patients with GBM were operated on with iMRI. Additional resection was performed if iMRI depicted contrast enhancing tissue suggestive of residual tumor. GTR and EOR were determined by segmentation and volumetric analysis of the MR images. SSIs and the role of intravenous only or intravenous plus intrathecal antibiotics were evaluated. Statistical analysis was performed to detect the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of iMRI-guided extended resections. Pearson's two-tailed chi-square test was performed to evaluate the rates of GTR and variables associated with SSI.

Results GTR was achieved in 59 patients (74.68%). Rate of GTR was 35.44% before iMRI and additional resections (p < 0.0001). Mean EOR was 96.27%. Positive predictive value for tumor cells in the additionally resected tissue was 88.6%, negative predictive value was 100%, sensitivity was 100%, and specificity was 70. 6%. Rate of SSIs was 5.06% (n = 4). Two superficial SSIs, one subdural empyema and one cerebritis, were seen. SSI rates with parenteral only and additional intrathecal antibiotics were 0% and 8%, respectively (p = 0.133).

Conclusion Increase of extent of tumor resection using iMRI is evident. SSI rate is within the normal range of neurosurgical procedures. A dual-use iMRI suite is a safe concept.

Keywords

antibiotic prophylaxis - extent of resection - intraoperative MRI - surgical site infections - glioblastoma - histopathology

Ethical Approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.


Informed Consent

For this type of study, formal consent is not required. Institutional review board approval for the review of notes was obtained from Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust.


 

  • References

  • 1 Kuhnt D, Becker A, Ganslandt O, Bauer M, Buchfelder M, Nimsky C. Correlation of the extent of tumor volume resection and patient survival in surgery of glioblastoma multiforme with high-field intraoperative MRI guidance. Neuro Oncol 2011; 13 (12) 1339-1348
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 2 Lacroix M, Abi-Said D, Fourney DR. , et al. A multivariate analysis of 416 patients with glioblastoma multiforme: prognosis, extent of resection, and survival. J Neurosurg 2001; 95 (02) 190-198
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 3 Soffietti R, Baumert BG, Bello L. , et al; European Federation of Neurological Societies. Guidelines on management of low-grade gliomas: report of an EFNS-EANO Task Force. Eur J Neurol 2010; 17 (09) 1124-1133
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 4 Paterno' V, Fahlbusch R. High-field iMRI in transsphenoidal pituitary adenoma surgery with special respect to typical localization of residual tumor. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2014; 156 (03) 463-474 ; discussion 474
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 5 Nimsky C, Ganslandt O, Cerny S, Hastreiter P, Greiner G, Fahlbusch R. Quantification of, visualization of, and compensation for brain shift using intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging. Neurosurgery 2000; 47 (05) 1070-1079 ; discussion 1079–1080
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 6 Ohue S, Kumon Y, Nagato S. , et al. Evaluation of intraoperative brain shift using an ultrasound-linked navigation system for brain tumor surgery. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo) 2010; 50 (04) 291-300
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 7 O'Keeffe AB, Lawrence T, Bojanic S. Oxford craniotomy infections database: a cost analysis of craniotomy infection. Br J Neurosurg 2012; 26 (02) 265-269
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 8 López Pereira P, Díaz-Agero Pérez C, López Fresneña N. , et al. Epidemiology of surgical site infection in a neurosurgery department. Br J Neurosurg 2017; 31 (01) 10-15
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 9 Karhade AV, Cote DJ, Larsen AM, Smith TR. Neurosurgical infection rates and risk factors: a national surgical quality improvement program analysis of 132,000 patients, 2006-2014. World Neurosurg 2017; 97: 205-212
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 10 Dashti SR, Baharvahdat H, Spetzler RF. , et al. Operative intracranial infection following craniotomy. Neurosurg Focus 2008; 24 (06) E10
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 11 Erman T, Demirhindi H, Göçer AI, Tuna M, Ildan F, Boyar B. Risk factors for surgical site infections in neurosurgery patients with antibiotic prophylaxis. Surg Neurol 2005; 63 (02) 107-112 ; discussion 112–113
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 12 Barker II FG. Efficacy of prophylactic antibiotics for craniotomy: a meta-analysis. Neurosurgery 1994; 35 (03) 484-490 ; discussion 491–492
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 13 Barker II FG. Efficacy of prophylactic antibiotics against meningitis after craniotomy: a meta-analysis. Neurosurgery 2007; 60 (05) 887-894 ; discussion 887–894
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 14 McClelland III S, Hall WA. Postoperative central nervous system infection: incidence and associated factors in 2111 neurosurgical procedures. Clin Infect Dis 2007; 45 (01) 55-59
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 15 Abraham P, Lamba N, Acosta M. , et al. Antibacterial prophylaxis for gram-positive and gram-negative infections in cranial surgery: a meta-analysis. J Clin Neurosci 2017; 45: 24-32
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 16 Liu W, Ni M, Zhang Y, Groen RJ. Antibiotic prophylaxis in craniotomy: a review. Neurosurg Rev 2014; 37 (03) 407-414 ; discussion 414
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 17 Abdullah KG, Attiah MA, Olsen AS, Richardson A, Lucas TH. Reducing surgical site infections following craniotomy: examination of the use of topical vancomycin. J Neurosurg 2015; 123 (06) 1600-1604
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 18 Ragel BT, Browd SR, Schmidt RH. Surgical shunt infection: significant reduction when using intraventricular and systemic antibiotic agents. J Neurosurg 2006; 105 (02) 242-247
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 19 Louis DN, Ohgaki H, Wiestler OD. , et al. The 2007 WHO classification of tumours of the central nervous system. Acta Neuropathol 2007; 114 (02) 97-109
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 20 Mangram AJ, Horan TC, Pearson ML, Silver LC, Jarvis WR. ; Hospital Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee. Guideline for prevention of surgical site infection, 1999. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 1999; 20 (04) 250-278; quiz 279–280
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 21 Ma R, Watts C. Selective 5-aminolevulinic acid-induced protoporphyrin IX fluorescence in gliomas. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2016; 158 (10) 1935-1941
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 22 Roder C, Bisdas S, Ebner FH. , et al. Maximizing the extent of resection and survival benefit of patients in glioblastoma surgery: high-field iMRI versus conventional and 5-ALA-assisted surgery. Eur J Surg Oncol 2014; 40 (03) 297-304
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 23 Senft C, Bink A, Franz K, Vatter H, Gasser T, Seifert V. Intraoperative MRI guidance and extent of resection in glioma surgery: a randomised, controlled trial. Lancet Oncol 2011; 12 (11) 997-1003
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 24 Stummer W, Pichlmeier U, Meinel T, Wiestler OD, Zanella F, Reulen HJ. ; ALA-Glioma Study Group. Fluorescence-guided surgery with 5-aminolevulinic acid for resection of malignant glioma: a randomised controlled multicentre phase III trial. Lancet Oncol 2006; 7 (05) 392-401
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 25 Keles GE, Anderson B, Berger MS. The effect of extent of resection on time to tumor progression and survival in patients with glioblastoma multiforme of the cerebral hemisphere. Surg Neurol 1999; 52 (04) 371-379
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 26 Hauser SB, Kockro RA, Actor B, Sarnthein J, Bernays RL. Combining 5-aminolevulinic acid fluorescence and intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging in glioblastoma surgery: a histology-based evaluation. Neurosurgery 2016; 78 (04) 475-483
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 27 Coburger J, Engelke J, Scheuerle A. , et al. Tumor detection with 5-aminolevulinic acid fluorescence and Gd-DTPA-enhanced intraoperative MRI at the border of contrast-enhancing lesions: a prospective study based on histopathological assessment. Neurosurg Focus 2014; 36 (02) E3
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 28 Valentini LG, Casali C, Chatenoud L, Chiaffarino F, Uberti-Foppa C, Broggi G. Surgical site infections after elective neurosurgery: a survey of 1747 patients. Neurosurgery 2008; 62 (01) 88-95 ; discussion 95–96
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 29 Korinek AM, Baugnon T, Golmard JL, van Effenterre R, Coriat P, Puybasset L. Risk factors for adult nosocomial meningitis after craniotomy: role of antibiotic prophylaxis. Neurosurgery 2006; 59: 126-133
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 30 Korinek AM. ; Service Epidémiologie Hygiène et Prévention. Risk factors for neurosurgical site infections after craniotomy: a prospective multicenter study of 2944 patients. The French Study Group of Neurosurgical Infections, the SEHP, and the C-CLIN Paris-Nord. Neurosurgery 1997; 41 (05) 1073-1079 ; discussion 1079–1081
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar