Open Access
CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Eur J Dent 2009; 03(03): 200-206
DOI: 10.1055/s-0039-1697432
Original Article
Dental Investigation Society

Effect of Thermo-mechanical Load Cycling on Microleakage in Class II Ormocer Restorations

Autor*innen

  • Dina Erdilek

    a   Dr, Department of Operative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Turkey
  • Can Dörter

    b   Associate Professor, Department of Operative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Turkey
  • Fatma Koray

    c   Professor, Department of Operative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Turkey
  • Karl-Heinz Kunzelmann

    d   Professor, Department of Restorative Dentistry and Periodontology, Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Munich, Germany
  • Begum Guray Efes

    b   Associate Professor, Department of Operative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Turkey
  • Yavuz Gomec

    b   Associate Professor, Department of Operative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Turkey
Weitere Informationen

Publikationsverlauf

Publikationsdatum:
27. September 2019 (online)

ABSTRACT

Objectives: The objective of this in vitro study was to evaluate the marginal sealing ability of an ormocer in comparison with a hybrid composite when using thermocycling and load cycling procedures together in the study design.

Methods: Modified proximal Class II cavities were prepared on the mesial and distal surfaces of twenty-two human premolars. Each tooth was restored with Admira and contralaterally with TPH Spectrum. Half of all of the teeth were subjected to thermo-mechanical load cycling. After dye penetration, longitudinal sections in mesio-distal direction were prepared and examined under a stereomicroscope. Data were analyzed with Mann Whitney U test.

Results: The results showed that the thermo-mechanical load cycling caused a statistically significant increase in gingival microleakage when compared with the non-thermocycled and nonloaded restorations for both the materials Admira (P=0.006) and TPH Spectrum (P=0.023).

Conclusions: Simultaneous load cycling and thermocycling are decisive factors in the in vitro assessment of gingival microleakage, which still remains to be a clinical problem even with the ormocer system Admira. (Eur J Dent 2009;3:200-206)

 
  • REFERENCES

  • 1 Kidd EA. Microleakage: A review. J Dent 1976;4:199-206.
  • 2 Bergenholtz G, Cox CF, Loesche WJ. Bacterial leakage around dental restorations: Its effect on the dental pulp. J Oral Pathol 1982;11:439-450.
  • 3 Brännström M. The cause of postoperative sensitivity and its prevention. J Endod 1986;12:475-481.
  • 4 Brännström M. Infection beneath composite resin restorations: Can be avoided? Oper Dent 1987;12:158-163.
  • 5 Going RE. Microleakage about dental restorations: A summarizing review. J Am Dent 1972;84:1349-1357.
  • 6 Hilton TJ , Ferracane JL. Cavity preparation factors and microleakage of Class II composite restorations filled at intraoral temperatures. Am J Dent 1998;11:123-130.
  • 7 Beznos C. Microleakage at the cervical margin of composite Class II cavities with different restorative techniques. Oper Dent 2001;26:60-69.
  • 8 Demarco FF, Ramos OL, Mota CS, Formola E , Justino LM. Influence of different restorative techniques on microleakage in Class II cavities with gingival wall in cementum. Oper Dent 2001;26:253-259.
  • 9 Derhami K, Coli P, Brännström M. Microleakage in Class II composite resin restorations. Oper Dent 1995;20:100-105.
  • 10 Ferrari M, Cagidiaco MC, Davidson CL. Resistance of cementum in Class II and V cavities to penetration by an adhesive system. Dent Mater 1997;13:157-162.
  • 11 Ferrari M, Mason PN, Fabianelli A, Cagidiaco MC, Kugel G , Davidson CL. Influence of tissue characteristics at margins on leakage of Class II indirect porcelain restorations. Am J Dent 1999; 12:134-142.
  • 12 Hilton TJ, Schwartz RS, Ferracane JL. Microleakage of four Class II resin composite insertion techniques at intraoral temperature. Quintessence Int 1997;28:135-144.
  • 13 Neme AL, Maxson BB, Pink FE, Aksu MN. Microleakage of Class II packable resin composites lined with flowables: An in vitro study. Oper Dent 2002;27:600-605.
  • 14 Abdalla AI , Davidson CL. Effect of mechanical load cycling on the marginal integrity of adhesive Class I resin composite restorations. J Dent 1996;24:87-90.
  • 15 Darbyshire PA, Messer LB, Douglas WH. Microleakage in Class II composite restorations bonded to dentin using thermal and load cycling. J Dent Res 1988;67:585-587.
  • 16 Davidson CL, Abdalla AI. Effect of occlusal load cycling on the marginal integrity of adhesive Class V restorations. Am J Dent 1994;7:111-114.
  • 17 Deveaux E, Hildelbert P, Neut C, Romont C. Bacterial microleakage of Cavit, IRM, TERM and Fermit: A 21 day in vitro study. J Endod 1999;25:653-659.
  • 18 Grossman ES , Sparrius O. Marginal adaptation of composite resin-restored dentinal cavities. J Prosthet Dent 1990;64:519-522.
  • 19 Hakimeh S, Vaidyanathan J, Houpt ML, Vaidyanathan TK, Von Hagen S. Microleakage of compomer Class V restorations: Effect of load cycling, thermal cycling and cavity shape differences. J Prosthet Dent 2000;83:194-203.
  • 20 Jang KT, Chung DH, Shin D, Garcia-Godoy F. Effect of eccentric load cycling on microleakage of Class V flowable and packable composite resin restorations. Oper Dent 2001;26:603-608.
  • 21 Kubo S, Yokota H, Sata Y, Hayashi Y. Microleakage of selfetching primers after thermal and flexural load cycling. Am J Dent 2001;14:163-169.
  • 22 Kubo S, Yokota H, Sata Y, Hayashi Y. The effect of flexural load cycling on the microleakage of cervical resin composites. Oper Dent 2001;25:451-459.
  • 23 Li H, Burrow MF, Tyas MJ. The effect of load cycling on the nanoleakage of dentin bonding systems. Dent Mater 2002;18:111-119.
  • 24 Li H, Burrow MF, Tyas MJ. The effect of thermocycling regimens on the nanoleakage of dentin bonding systems. Dent Mater 2002;18:189-196.
  • 25 Mayer T, Eickholz P. Microleakage of temporary restorations after thermocycling and mechanical loading. J Endod 1997;23:320-322.
  • 26 Yamazaki PCV, Bedran-Russo AKB, Pereira PNR, Swift Jr EJ. Microleakage evaluation of a new low-shrinkage composite restorative material. Oper Dent 2006;31:670- 676.
  • 27 Rigsby DF, Retief DH, Bidez MW, Russell CM. Effect of axial load and temperature cycling on microleakage of resin restorations. Am J Dent 1992;5:155-159.
  • 28 Bagheri M, Ghavamnasiri M. Effect of cavosurface margin configuration of Class V cavity preparations on microleakage of composite resin restorations. J Contemp Dent Pract 2008;9:122-129.
  • 29 Xalabarde A, Garcia-Godoy F, Boj JR, Canalda C. Microleakage of fissur sealants after occlusal enameloplasty and thermocycling. J Clin Pediatr Dent 1998;22:231-235.
  • 30 Fruits TJ, Knapp JA, Khajotia SS. Microleakage in the proximal walls of direct and indirect posterior resin slot restorations. Oper Dent 2006;31:719-727.
  • 31 Ozel E, Korkmaz Y. Attar N. Influence of location of the gingival margin on the microleakage and internal voids of nanocomposites. J Contemp Dent Pract 2008;9:65-72.
  • 32 Heintze S, Forjanic M, Cavaller A. Microleakage of Class II restorations with different tracers � Comparison with SEM quantitative analysis. J Adhes Dent 2008;10:259-267.
  • 33 Opdam NJ, Roeters JJ, Kuijs R, Burgersdijk RC. Necessity of bevels for box only Class II composite restorations. J Prosthet Dent 1998;80:274-279.
  • 34 Drummond JL, Mahendra SB. Static and cyclic loading of fiber-reinforced dental resin. Dent Mater 2003;19:226-231.
  • 35 Manhart J, Schmidt M, Chen HY, Kunzelman KH, Hickel R. Marginal quality of tooth-coloured restorations in Class II cavities after artificial aging. Oper Dent 2001;26:357-366.
  • 36 Haller B, Schuster P. Randqualität eines ormocers (Admira) und eines Feinhybridkomposits (Arabesk Top) in Klasse-II-Kavitäten. Dtsch Zahnärztl Z 2000;55:331-335.
  • 37 Ausiello P, Davidson CL, Cascone P, Dee Gee AJ, Rengo S. Debonding of adhesively restored deep Class II MOD restorations after functional loading. Am J Dent 1999;12:84-88.