Cortical Pressure Injury: A Hypothesis to Explain the Incongruity of Clinical and Radiologic Improvement in Decompressive Craniectomy

Abstract

It has astonished neuroscientists since the advent of decompressive craniectomy as to why a seemingly successfully achieved goal of reduction in intracranial pressure (ICP), by removing a portion of the cranial vault and the resultant intracranial volume augmentation, fails to give the desired beneficial clinical outcome in every case and in fact, at times, proves to be deleterious in some conditions with a shared problem of refractory raised ICP. The authors propose a hypothesis based on the understanding of the anatomy and physiology of the brain that can explain the fallacy.

Keywords

decompressive craniectomy - cortical pressure injury - hypothesis

• References

• 1 Vahedi K, Hofmeijer J, Juettler E. et al. DECIMAL, DESTINY, and HAMLET investigators. Early decompressive surgery in malignant infarction of the middle cerebral artery: a pooled analysis of three randomised controlled trials. Lancet Neurol 2007; 6 (03) 215-222
• 2 Aarabi B, Hesdorffer DC, Ahn ES, Aresco C, Scalea TM, Eisenberg HM. Outcome following decompressive craniectomy for malignant swelling due to severe head injury. J Neurosurg 2006; 104 (04) 469-479
• 3 Perin A, Nascimben E, Longatti P. Decompressive craniectomy in a case of intractable intracranial hypertension due to pneumococcal meningitis. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2008; 150 (08) 837-842
• 4 Zuurbier SM, Coutinho JM, Majoie CBLM. Coert BA, van den Munckhof P, Stam J. Decompressive hemicraniectomy in severe cerebral venous thrombosis: a prospective case series. J Neurol 2012; 259 (06) 1099-1105
• 5 Schneider GH, Bardt T, Lanksch WR, Unterberg A. Decompressive craniectomy following traumatic brain injury: ICP, CPP and neurological outcome. Acta Neurochir Suppl (Wien) 2002; 81: 77-79
• 6 Olivecrona M, Rodling-Wahlström M, Naredi S, Koskinen LO. Effective ICP reduction by decompressive craniectomy in patients with severe traumatic brain injury treated by an ICP-targeted therapy. J Neurotrauma 2007; 24 (06) 927-935
• 7 Cooper DJ, Rosenfeld JV, Murray L. et al. DECRA Trial Investigators; Australian and New Zealand Intensive Care Society Clinical Trials Group. Decompressive craniectomy in diffuse traumatic brain injury. N Engl J Med 2011; 364 (16) 1493-1502
• 8 Zlokovic BV. The blood-brain barrier in health and chronic neurodegenerative disorders. Neuron 2008; 57 (02) 178-201
• 9 Zlokovic BV. Neurovascular mechanisms of Alzheimer’s neurodegeneration. Trends Neurosci 2005; 28 (04) 202-208
• 10 Lee RM. Morphology of cerebral arteries. Pharmacol Ther 1995; 66 (01) 149-173
• 11 Duvernoy HM, Delon S, Vannson JL. Cortical blood vessels of the human brain. Brain Res Bull 1981; 7 (05) 519-579
• 12 Nonaka H, Akima M, Hatori T, Nagayama T, Zhang Z, Ihara F. Microvasculature of the human cerebral white matter: arteries of the deep white matter. Neuropathology 2003; 23 (02) 111-118
• 13 Skoglund TS, Eriksson-Ritzén C, Jensen C, Rydenhag B. Aspects on decompressive craniectomy in patients with traumatic head injuries. J Neurotrauma 2006; 23 (10) 1502-1509
• 14 Bhat AR, Kirmani AR. “Sunken brain and scalp flap” syndrome following decompressive “extra-craniectomy”. Indian J Neurotrauma 2011; 8: 105-108
• 15 Segal DH, Oppenheim JS, Murovic JA. Neurological recovery after cranioplasty. Neurosurgery 1994; 34 (04) 729-731, discussion 731