Int J Angiol 2023; 32(02): 146-152
DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1730448
Letter to the Editor

Venous Thromboembolism Risk Assessment and Thromboprophylaxis Practice in General Medical Patients Requiring Admissions to General Wards: A Singapore's Perspective, Part 2

1   Department of General Medicine, Woodlands Health Campus, Singapore, Singapore
,
Navin Kuthiah
1   Department of General Medicine, Woodlands Health Campus, Singapore, Singapore
,
Thofique Adamjee
2   Department of General Medicine, Khoo Teck Puat Hospital, Singapore, Singapore
,
Jam Chin Tay
3   Department of General Medicine, Tan Tock Seng Hospital, Singapore, Singapore
› Author Affiliations

We have previously conducted a survey[1] on specialist physicians (associate consultants, consultants, and senior consultants) who are in charge of general medical admissions in general wards of three public hospitals in Singapore in September 2020. It showed only 47 and 23% of the respondents perform venous thromboembolism (VTE) risk assessment and prescribe VTE prophylaxis, respectively, in general medical patients admitted to general wards despite VTE prophylaxis is recommended by major international guidelines.[2] [3] [4]

As the incidence of VTE is on the rise in Singapore,[5] we wonder if the nonspecialist physicians, who are generally younger, have different perception about VTE risk assessment and thromboprophylaxis in comparison to the more senior specialist physicians. We therefore conducted a similar survey on nonspecialist physicians of the same three public hospitals.



Publication History

Article published online:
31 August 2021

© 2021. International College of Angiology. This article is published by Thieme.

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA