The Learning Curve of Reaching the Planned Limb Alignment in Robotic-Arm-Assisted Total Knee Arthroplasty

Abstract

Evidence on the learning curve associated with robotic-arm-assisted total knee arthroplasty (ra-TKA) is scarce and mostly based on operative time. Thus, the objective of this study was to assess a surgeon's learning experience based on accuracy to reach planned limb alignment and its impact on surgical-characteristics, limb-alignment, and perioperative-outcomes. A retrospective chart review was conducted on a consecutive series of 204 primary ra-TKAs (patients), performed by a single surgeon in a single institution (3/7/2018-to-6/18/2019). Cumulative summation control sequential analysis was used for the assessment of the learning curve using accuracy of reaching the planned limb alignment establishing that surgeries had an initial-learning-phase, followed by a second-consolidation-phase. Baseline demographics, operative/tourniquet times, prosthesis type, and limb alignment were compared between these two phases. Length of stay, discharge disposition, complications, reoperation/readmission (90 days), and total morphine equivalents (TMEs) prescribed were compared between phases. Independent sample t-tests, and chi-squared analyses were performed. ra-TKA demonstrated a learning curve of 110 cases for reaching planned limb alignment (p = 0.012). Robotic experience resulted in significantly more proportion of knees in neutral-axis postoperatively (p = 0.035) and significant reduction in TMEs prescribed (p = 0.04). The mean operative and tourniquet time were found to be significantly lower in second-phase versus the first-phase (p for both < 0.0001). ra-TKA has a significant learning curve in clinical practice. A surgeon can reach the planned limb alignment with increased accuracy over time (110-cases). Progressive robotic learning and associated operative time efficiency can lead to significantly lower opioid consumption in patients undergoing TKA.

Keywords

robotic-arm-assisted TKA - ra-TKA - learning curve - accuracy - alignment

Publication History

Received: 30 December 2020

Accepted: 16 November 2021

Article published online:
24 December 2021

• References

• 1 Naziri Q, Burekhovich SA, Mixa PJ. et al. The trends in robotic-assisted knee arthroplasty: a statewide database study. J Orthop 2019; 16 (03) 298-301
• 2 Zhang W, Moskowitz RW, Nuki G. et al. OARSI recommendations for the management of hip and knee osteoarthritis, Part II: OARSI evidence-based, expert consensus guidelines. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2008; 16 (02) 137-162
• 3 Bryan S, Goldsmith LJ, Davis JC. et al. Revisiting patient satisfaction following total knee arthroplasty: a longitudinal observational study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2018; 19 (01) 423
• 4 Baker PN, van der Meulen JH, Lewsey J, Gregg PJ. National Joint Registry for England and Wales, Data from the National Joint Registry for England and Wales. The role of pain and function in determining patient satisfaction after total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2007; 89 (07) 893-900
• 5 Ritter MA, Faris PM, Keating EM, Meding JB. Postoperative alignment of total knee replacement. Its effect on survival. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1994; (299) 153-156
• 6 Jeffery RS, Morris RW, Denham RA. Coronal alignment after total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1991; 73 (05) 709-714
• 7 Parratte S, Pagnano MW, Trousdale RT, Berry DJ. Effect of postoperative mechanical axis alignment on the fifteen-year survival of modern, cemented total knee replacements. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2010; 92 (12) 2143-2149
• 8 Song EK, Seon JK, Yim JH, Netravali NA, Bargar WL. Robotic-assisted TKA reduces postoperative alignment outliers and improves gap balance compared to conventional TKA. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2013; 471 (01) 118-126
• 9 Song EK, Seon JK, Park SJ, Jung WB, Park HW, Lee GW. Simultaneous bilateral total knee arthroplasty with robotic and conventional techniques: a prospective, randomized study. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2011; 19 (07) 1069-1076
• 10 Kayani B, Konan S, Pietrzak JRT, Haddad FS. Iatrogenic bone and soft tissue trauma in robotic-arm assisted total knee arthroplasty compared with conventional jig-based total knee arthroplasty: a prospective cohort study and validation of a new classification system. J Arthroplasty 2018; 33 (08) 2496-2501
• 11 Khlopas A, Chughtai M, Hampp EL. et al. Robotic-arm assisted total knee arthroplasty demonstrated soft tissue protection. Surg Technol Int 2017; 30: 441-446
• 12 Sodhi N, Khlopas A, Piuzzi NS. et al. The learning curve associated with robotic total knee arthroplasty. J Knee Surg 2018; 31 (01) 17-21
• 13 Kayani B, Konan S, Huq SS, Tahmassebi J, Haddad FS. Robotic-arm assisted total knee arthroplasty has a learning curve of seven cases for integration into the surgical workflow but no learning curve effect for accuracy of implant positioning. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2019; 27 (04) 1132-1141
• 14 Moon YW, Ha CW, Do KH. et al. Comparison of robot-assisted and conventional total knee arthroplasty: a controlled cadaver study using multiparameter quantitative three-dimensional CT assessment of alignment. Comput Aided Surg 2012; 17 (02) 86-95
• 15 Perillo-Marcone A, Barrett DS, Taylor M. The importance of tibial alignment: finite element analysis of tibial malalignment. J Arthroplasty 2000; 15 (08) 1020-1027
• 16 Bhimani SJ, Bhimani R, Smith A, Eccles C, Smith L, Malkani A. Robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty demonstrates decreased postoperative pain and opioid usage compared to conventional total knee arthroplasty. Bone Jt Open 2020; 1 (02) 8-12