Subscribe to RSS
DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-109775
Needle-based confocal endomicroscopy for evaluation of malignant lymph nodes – a feasibility study
Publication History
submitted31 July 2015
accepted after revision04 May 2016
Publication Date:
19 July 2016 (online)
Background and aims: Current modalities for lymph node staging in cancer can be limited. We sought to evaluate the feasibility of needle-based confocal laser endomicroscopy (nCLE) at the time of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) and to describe the nCLE features that distinguish between benign, malignant, and inflammatory lymph nodes.
Methods: We collected data on 28 consecutive patients during EUS staging of malignancy or assessment of enlarged lymph nodes. Patients underwent nCLE at the time of EUS followed by fine needle biopsy. nCLE images were correlated with the patients’ final histopathology.
Results: All 28 patients successfully underwent nCLE during EUS without adverse events. There were 17 cases of carcinoma, 4 lymphoid malignancies, and 7 benign lymph nodes. We characterized the various nCLE features of the lymph node capsule and cortex. Features of carcinoma, such as clusters of dark pleomorphic tumor cells, were identified and found to correlate well with the final pathology. Lymphoid malignancies often had enlarged follicles, but this was inconsistent.
Conclusions: nCLE of lymph nodes at the time of EUS is feasible and appears to be safe. Dark pleomorphic cells were readily identified in all of the malignant lymph nodes and correlated with tumor cells seen on histology.
-
References
- 1 Blencowe NS, Whistance RN, Strong S et al. Evaluating the role of fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography-computed tomography in multi-disciplinary team recommendations for oesophago-gastric cancer. Br J Cancer 2013; 109: 1445-1450
- 2 McAndrew MR, Saba AK. Efficacy of routine preoperative computed tomography scans in colon cancer. Am Surg 1999; 65: 205
- 3 Veit P, Ruehm S, Kuehl H et al. Lymph node staging with dual-modality PET/CT: enhancing the diagnostic accuracy in oncology. Eur J Radiol 2006; 58: 383-399
- 4 Hundt W, Braunschweig R, Reiser M. Evaluation of spiral CT in staging of colon and rectum carcinoma. Eur Radiol 1999; 9: 78
- 5 Long NM, Smith CS. Causes and imaging features of false positives and false negatives on F-PET/CT in oncologic imaging. Insights Imaging 2011; 2: 679-698
- 6 Chang JM, Lee HJ, Goo JM et al. False positive and false negative FDG-PET scans in various thoracic diseases. Korean J Radiol 2006; 7: 57-69
- 7 Ha TK, Choi YY, Song SY et al. F18-fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography and computed tomography is not accurate in preoperative staging of gastric cancer. J Korean Surg Soc 2011; 81: 104-110
- 8 Lerut T, Flamen P, Ectors N et al. Histopathologic validation of lymph node staging with FDG-PET scan in cancer of the esophagus and gastroesophageal junction: A prospective study based on primary surgery with extensive lymphadenectomy. Ann Surg 2000; 232: 743-752
- 9 Yoon HH, Lowe VJ, Cassivi SD et al. The role of FDG-PET and staging laparoscopy in the management of patients with cancer of the esophagus or gastroesophageal junction. Gastroenterol Clin North Am 2009; 38: 105-120
- 10 Walker AJ, Spier BJ, Perlman SB et al. Integrated PET/CT fusion imaging and endoscopic ultrasound in the pre-operative staging and evaluation of esophageal cancer. Mol Imaging Biol 2011; 13: 166-171
- 11 Kwee RM, Kwee TC. Imaging in assessing lymph node status in gastric cancer. Gastric Cancer 2009; 12: 6-22
- 12 Hernandez LV, Mishra G, George S et al. A descriptive analysis of EUS-FNA for mediastinal lymphadenopathy: an emphasis on clinical impact and false negative results. Am J Gastroenterol 2004; 99: 249-254
- 13 Becker V, Wallace MB, Fockens P et al. Needle-based confocal endomicroscopy for in vivo histology of intra-abdominal organs: first results in a porcine model (with videos). Gastrointest Endosc 2010; 71: 1260-1266
- 14 Allison RT, Baron S, Peckitt N. Lymph node micro-metastasis: an investigation, including three-dimensional reconstruction. Br J Biomed Sci 1994; 51: 109-113